J.W. Kramer, G.W. Coates / Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 6973–6978
6977
week over CaH2 and degassed by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles;
solid lactones were dried under vacuum following sublimation.
recovered as a white solid (1.6 g, 88%). 1H NMR (
d
, CDCl3, 300 MHz)
2.44–2.67 (m,1H), 2.70–2.93 (m,1H), 3.34 (dd, 3J¼4.3 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz,
1H), 3.77 (dd, 3J¼5.8 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (dddd, 3J¼3.9 Hz,
4.2. General procedure for the carbonylation
of fluorinated epoxides
3J¼4.1 Hz, 3J¼5.6 Hz, 3J¼6.1 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (
d, CDCl3, 125 MHz)
36.1 (t, JCF¼21.6 Hz), 44.6, 63.8, 166.2 (The fluorine-substituted
2
carbons could not be definitively identified.); 19F NMR (
d, CDCl3,
This procedure is analogous to the previously published low
pressure carbonylation of epoxides.9f In a drybox, 1 (110 mg,
0.20 mmol) was dissolved in DME (3.0 mL). The solution was
transferred to an oven-dried Fisher–Porter bottle with a magnetic
stir bar and the reactor was sealed. Epoxide (6.0 mmol) and DME
(3.0 mL) were drawn into a GastightÒ syringe, the needle of which
was inserted into a septum to avoid air contamination upon
removal from the glove box. The reactor and syringe were removed
from the glove box and the reactor was immediately pressured
with CO (20 psi) and cooled to 0 ꢁC. After 3 min, the epoxide
solution was added to the stirring catalyst solution under a light
flow of CO. The reactor was then pressured with CO (100 psi) and
warmed to room temperature. After 6 h, the reactor was carefully
vented in a fume hood and the lactone was isolated as described
below.
470 MHz) ꢀ128.9, ꢀ127.3, ꢀ116.3, ꢀ83.9. IR: nCO¼1831 cmꢀ1
.
25
Mp¼33–34 ꢁC. [
a]
D
ꢀ10.8 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2). HRMS (EI) calculated
(C8H5F9O2ꢀCO2) 260.0247; measured 260.0237, fit ꢀ3.9 ppm.
4.2.5. 4-(2,2,3,3,4,5,5,5-Octafluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl)pentyl)-2-
propiolactone (3e)
The general procedure was followed with epoxide 2e (2.0 g,
6.0 mmol). The product was purified by distillation at 60 ꢁC under
vacuum and 3e was recovered as a slightly pink oil (1.9 g, 91%). 1H
NMR (d, CDCl3, 300 MHz) 2.45–2.67 (m, 1H), 2.71–2.94 (m, 1H), 3.34
(dd, 3J¼4.3 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (dd, 3J¼5.9 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz, 1H),
4.88 (dddd, 3J¼4.0 Hz, 3J¼4.2 Hz, 3J¼5.6 Hz, 3J¼6.1 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR
2
(d
, CDCl3, 125 MHz) 36.1 (t, JCF¼21.9 Hz), 44.5, 64.0, 90.1 (dsept,
2JCF¼34.4 Hz, 1JCF¼223.5 Hz), 112.3 (tdt, JCF¼26.6 Hz, JCF¼36.0 Hz,
2
2
1JCF¼266.4 Hz), 117.3 (tt, JCF¼34.5 Hz, JCF¼258.1 Hz), 119.0 (qd,
2
1
2JCF¼27.1 Hz, JCF¼289.9 Hz), 166.5; 19F NMR (
d, CDCl3, 470 MHz)
1
4.2.1. 4-(2,3,3,3-Tetrafluoro-2-(trifluoromethyl)-
propyl)-2-propiolactone (3a)
The general procedure was followed with epoxide 2a (1.4 g,
6.0 mmol). The product was purified by distillation at 60 ꢁC under
vacuum and 3a was recovered as a colorless oil (1.3 g, 86%). 1H NMR
ꢀ189.2, ꢀ119.5, ꢀ116.3, ꢀ75.3. IR: nCO¼1842 cmꢀ1. HRMS (EI) calcu-
lated (C9H5F11O2ꢀCO2) 310.0215; measured 310.0203, fit ꢀ4.0 ppm.
4.2.6. 4-(2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,9,9,9-Heptadecafluorononyl)-2-
propiolactone (3f)
(
d
, CDCl3, 300 MHz) 2.45–2.63 (m, 1H), 2.72–2.90 (m, 1H), 3.29 (dd,
The general procedure was followed with epoxide 2f (0.95 g,
2.0 mmol). The product was purified by column chromatography
(silica gel eluted with CH2Cl2) and 3f was recovered as a white solid
3J¼4.2 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (dd, 3J¼5.8 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz,1H), 4.83
(m, 1H); 13C NMR (
d
, CDCl3, 125 MHz) 33.8 (d, JCF¼19.7 Hz), 44.7,
2
2
1
64.3, 90.4 (dsept, JCF¼32.4 Hz, JCF¼204.4 Hz), 120.5 (qd,
(0.72 g, 71%). 1H NMR (
d, CDCl3, 300 MHz) 2.45–2.67 (m, 1H),
2JCF¼26.8 Hz, JCF¼284.7 Hz), 166.2; 19F NMR (
d, CDCl3, 470 MHz)
2.72–2.94 (m, 1H), 3.35 (dd, 3J¼4.3 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (dd,
1
ꢀ188.3, ꢀ79.9, ꢀ79.5. IR: nCO¼1842 cmꢀ1. HRMS (EI) calculated
(C7H5F7O2ꢀCO2) 210.0279; measured 210.0271, fit ꢀ3.9 ppm.
3J¼5.9 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (dddd, 3J¼4.0 Hz, 3J¼4.2 Hz,
3J¼5.6 Hz, 3J¼6.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (
d, CDCl3, 125 MHz) 36.3 (t,
2JCF¼21.5 Hz), 44.7, 63.8, 166.1 (The fluorine-substituted carbons
4.2.2. 4-(1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethoxymethyl)-2-propiolactone (3b)
The general procedure was followed with epoxide 2b (1.0 g,
6.0 mmol). The product was purified by distillation at 70 ꢁC under
vacuum and 3b was recovered as a colorless oil (0.96 g, 79%). 1H
could not be definitively identified.); 19F NMR (
d, CDCl3, 470 MHz)
ꢀ129.0, ꢀ126.2, ꢀ125.6, ꢀ124.8, ꢀ124.8, ꢀ124.5, ꢀ116.0, ꢀ83.6.
IR: nCO¼1815 cmꢀ1
.
Mp¼84–85 ꢁC. HRMS (EI) calculated
(C12H5F17O2ꢀCO2) 460.0120; measured 460.0119, fit ꢀ0.3 ppm.
NMR (
d
, CDCl3, 300 MHz) 3.42 (dd, 3J¼4.2 Hz, 2J¼16.5 Hz, 1H), 3.61
(dd, 3J¼6.3 Hz, 2J¼16.5 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (dd, 3J¼4.5 Hz, 2J¼11.7 Hz, 1H),
4.2.7. 4-(Pentafluorophenylmethyl)-2-propiolactone (3g)
4.37 (dd, 3J¼3.3 Hz, 2J¼11.7 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (dddd, 3J¼4.2 Hz,
The general procedure was followed with epoxide 2g (1.3 g,
6.0 mmol). The product was purified by concentration of the crude
reaction mixture followed by sublimation (60 ꢁC; cold finger cooled
3J¼4.5 Hz, 3J¼6.0 Hz, 3J¼7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.78 (tt, JHF¼2.6 Hz,
3
2JHF¼54.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (
d, CDCl3, 125 MHz) 39.8, 63.5, 67.3,
2
1
2
107.6 (tt, JCF¼41.1 Hz, JCF¼249.8 Hz), 117.3 (tt, JCF¼28.4 Hz,
to ꢀ78 ꢁC) and 3g was recovered as a white solid (1.2 g, 82%). (
d,
1JCF¼268.4 Hz), 166.7; 19F NMR (
d
, CDCl3, 470 MHz) ꢀ139.9, ꢀ139.7,
CDCl3, 300 MHz) 3.16–3.32 (m, 3H), 3.60 (dd, 3J¼5.8 Hz, 2J¼16.6 Hz,
ꢀ94.7. IR: nCO¼1839 cmꢀ1. HRMS (EI) calculated (C6H6F4O3ꢀCO2)
1H), 4.71 (dddd, 3J¼4.1 Hz, 3J¼4.3 Hz, 3J¼5.8 Hz, 3J¼6.0 Hz, 1H); 13
C
2
158.0355; measured 158.0350, fit ꢀ3.0 ppm.
NMR (
d
, CDCl3, 125 MHz) 27.7, 43.2, 68.4, 108.7 (t, JCF¼18.6 Hz),
137.7, 140.7, 145.5, 166.6; 19F NMR (
d
, CDCl3, 470 MHz) ꢀ164.3,
4.2.3. 4-(2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,5-Nonafluoropentyl)-2-propiolactone (3c)
The general procedure was followed with epoxide 2c (1.7 g,
6.0 mmol). The product was purified by concentration of the crude
reaction mixture followed by sublimation (35 ꢁC; cold finger cooled
to 0 ꢁC) and 3c was recovered as a white solid (1.6 g, 85%). 1H NMR
ꢀ157.4, ꢀ145.3. IR: nCO¼1819 cmꢀ1. Mp¼72–74 ꢁC. HRMS (EI)
calculated (C10H5F5O2) 252.0210; measured 252.0219, fit 3.7 ppm.
4.3. General procedure for the polymerization
of fluorinated lactones
(d, CDCl3, 300 MHz) 2.44–2.67 (m, 1H), 2.71–2.94 (m, 1H), 3.34 (dd,
3J¼4.3 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz,1H), 3.78 (dd, 3J¼5.8 Hz, 2J¼16.7 Hz, 1H), 4.88
(dddd, 3J¼3.9 Hz, 3J¼4.1 Hz, 3J¼5.6 Hz, 3J¼6.1 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (
d
,
In a drybox, catalyst 4 (4.9 mg, 0.01 mmol) and lactone
2
CDCl3, 125 MHz) 36.1 (t, JCF¼21.6 Hz), 44.6, 63.8, 166.3 (The
(1.0 mmol) were weighed into separate dry, 4 mL vials. A stir bar
was added to the vial with 4. Dry toluene (0.5 mL) was added to
each of the vials, and the catalyst solution was transferred to the
vial with lactone. The vial was then capped with a Teflon-lined cap,
removed from the drybox, and immediately submerged into an oil
bath preheated to 50 ꢁC. After the reaction mixture was stirred for
6 h, the vial was cooled to room temperature and the polymeriza-
tion was quenched with the addition of five drops MeOH. The
polymers were isolated as described below.
fluorine-substituted carbons could not be definitively identified.); 19
F
NMR
(
d
,
CDCl3, 470 MHz) ꢀ129.1, ꢀ127.5, ꢀ116.5, ꢀ84.1. IR:
nCO¼1844 cmꢀ1. Mp¼41–42 ꢁC. HRMS (EI) calculated (C8H5F9O2ꢀCO2)
260.0247; measured 260.0250, fit 1.1 ppm.
4.2.4. (R)-4-(2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,5-Nonafluoropentyl)-2-propiolactone (3d)
The general procedure was followed with epoxide 2d (1.7 g,
6.0 mmol). The product was purified as in 3c and lactone 3d was