Organic Letters
Letter
a
Scheme 2. Synthetic Approaches toward DIMs
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for 3a
entry
2a (equiv)
CF3SO2Na (equiv)
time (h)
yield (%)
b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
46
46
46
46
46
1
2
3
4
5
0.1
0.5
0.7
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
24
24
24
24
24
19
19
19
19
19
24
24
24
24
24
36
44
61
57
63
36
60
60
b
b
b
b
b
9
59
77
81
10
11
12
13
14
15
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
c
NR
NR
e
d
34
f
5
2
NR
a
Reaction conditions: indole 1a (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv), acetone 2a
(1.5 mmol, 5.0 equiv), CF3SO2Na (0.6 mmol, 2.0 equiv), toluene (1.0
mL, 0.3 M), O2 (1.0 atm), UV irradiation (350−380 nm, 26 W lamp),
b
c
d
e
rt, 24 h; isolated yield. GC yield. No light. N2 atmosphere. Air
f
atmosphere. No CF3SO2Na.
a
Scheme 3. Substrates Scope with Alkyl Ketone
commercially available neutral salt CF3SO2Na as a mediator.
The reaction is conducted at room temperature under UV
irradiation and 1 atm pressure. The method does not involve
any use of a transition metal, photocatalyst, base, or acid. It
shows a broad substrate scope and gram-scalable ability. It is
noted that most of the obtained DIMs show anticancer
activities in human bladder cancer cell lines EJ and T24.
Finally, a possible mechanism is proposed for the synthesis.
We first attempt to synthesize 3,3′-(propane-2,2-diyl)bis-
(1H-indole) 3a by treating a mixture of indole 1a with acetone
2a (1.0 mL, also as a solvent) and 1.0 equiv of CF3SO2Na
under UV irradiation in an oxygen atmosphere, and the yield of
3a is 57% (Table 1, entries 1−4). Next, we optimize the
amount of CF3SO2Na, and 2.0 equiv of the salt is the best
(63%, entry 5). Afterward, the reaction is carried out at room
temperature by adding 5.0 equiv of acetone 2a, and the 3a
yield is 77% at 19 h (entry 10) and 81% at 24 h (entry 11).
The reaction does not take place without light or oxygen
(entries 12 and 13). When the reaction is conducted in air (1
atm), the yield is low (34%, entry 14). In addition, in the
absence of CF3SO2Na, there is no reaction (entry 15). The X-
ray structure of 3a is shown in Scheme 3.
Adopting the optimized conditions, we explored the scope of
the substrates (Scheme 3). With the attachment of the
electron-deficient fluorine atom on the indole, there is an
apparent decrease in reactivity (3b, 17%), plausibly due to the
lowering of the electron density of aromatic rings. In the case
of introducing a 5-methoxy group on the indole, the product
yield increases to 49% (3c). The insertion of a cyano group
results in a good product yield (3d, 84%). With 5-NO2 and 6-
NO2 groups on the rings, the yields of products 3e and 3f are
significantly different, 70 and 38%, respectively. In the case of
having a 7-methoxy group on the rings, the yield of 3g is 55%.
As for alkyl ketones, cyclopentanone and cyclohexanone give
3h and 3i in 40 and 30% yield, respectively. Compared with
a
Reaction conditions: indole 1 (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv), ketone 2 (1.5
mmol, 5.0 equiv), CF3SO2Na (0.6 mmol, 2.0 equiv), toluene (1.0 mL,
0.3 M), O2 (1.0 atm), UV irradiation (350−380 nm, 26 W lamp), rt,
24 h; isolated yield.
the previous protocol,14a our approach gives a better yield of
3a (81%). (The yield of using Bi(NO3)3·5H2O as the catalyst
is 67%.)
Aromatic ketones are also well adopted in this reaction
(Scheme 4). Acetophenones with bromine and iodine show
similar reactivities (4a−c, 58−62%). Acetonaphthones with
methyl sulfide and naphthyl groups give 4d and 4e in much
lower yield (31 and 26%, respectively). With the thiophene
derivative, the yield of 4f is 36%, but in the cases of furan and
pyrrole, there is no yield of any product. However, our system
provides excellent selectivity for 4a,b. Nonetheless, when HCl
was used, the yields of 4a and 4b become 37 and 53%,
respectively, with two side products.13
Compared with the ketones that are less reactive, the
aldehydes show much higher efficiency. No matter whether an
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX