580
P. Velez-Herrera, H. Ishida / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 130 (2009) 573–580
azine synthesis [26]. Once this gel is formed, it is not possible to
break the triaza ring and the formation of the oxazine ring does not
proceed. On the other hand, if the concentration is lower than 10%,
only a small amount of solids are observed and the reaction is
almost complete after 48 h.
of asymmetric trisubstituted benzene. The bands between 1200
and 1100 are assigned to the CF2 stretching [30]. The absence of
hydroxyl groups is confirmed by the lack of intermolecular
hydrogen bonded group, which appears between 3600 cmꢀ1 and
3200 cmꢀ1 [31]. This further confirms that the purification has
successfully eliminated any unreacted phenol and oligomers.
Compound 9 shows a strong band at 1615 cmꢀ1 which is related to
the –C C– ‘‘quadrant stretching’’ of the para-substitued benzene
ring.
The synthesis of ARF12M was carried out in chloroform. During
this step the concentration was again an important factor. After 2 h
of reaction a swollen-insoluble compound was formed and a 1H
NMR resonance at 4.91 ppm was found. This resonance value
corresponds to the 1,3,5-triaza structure that is an intermediate on
the benzoxazine synthesis [26]. Unlike the triaza compound
formed with the aliphatic amine (6), this can be broken by
decreasing the pH of the solution to 1 or 2 or by increasing the
concentration of the solution [14]. If the concentration is 30% (w/
w) or higher, the resonance at 4.91 ppm decreases while, at the
same time, two new resonances at 5.3 ppm and 4.6 ppm start to
appear. After 48 h of reaction, most of the resonance at 4.91 ppm
has despaired.
The difference in the stability of the 1,3,5-triazas formed from
compound 6 and compound 8 is because 1,3,5-triaza compound
from aliphatic amines are extremely weak base and only very small
quantities of monoprotonated cations are sufficient to inhibit
further base hydrolysis. They are, therefore, exceptionally stable
and can be hydrolyzed only after several days under very acidic
conditions using an aqueous solution of HCl. On the other hand
1,3,5-triaza compound from aromatic amines can be hydrolyzed
due to the fact that the aromatic ring allows the stabilization of the
amino-carbonium ion with its resonance structure the iminium
ion [26,27].
The 1H NMR spectra, Fig. 5, suggest that the hydrogenated
group next to the amine, either methylene or phenyl, has a greater
influence in the chemical shift than the fluorinated portion of the
amine. The typical characteristic chemical shift for the oxazine
methylene groups in ALF8M are 4.09 ppm and 4.81 ppm that are
very close to the aliphatic-diamine based benzoxazine, whose two
peaks appear at approximately 4.0 ppm and 4.9 ppm [28]. For
compound ARF12M, the typical peaks are located at 4.65 ppm and
5.34 ppm and are similar to BA-a benzoxazine, which is
characterized for the peaks at 4.6 ppm and 5.3 ppm [26]. The
absence of any proton resonances between the two frequencies
indicates the absence of a 1,3,5-triaza type compound. This fact
indicates that the purification was successful at separating any
intermediate compounds. Furthermore the absence of any
Mannich bridge protons of open oxazine ring around 3.7 ppm
indicates the absence of oligomeric species. The integration
analysis of the proton resonances shows the closed-ring content
of each compound better than 99%.
4. Conclusions
Two novel, highly fluorinated benzoxazine monomers have
been successfully synthesized and characterized. A new synthetic
method that leads to high yield with shorter reaction time and
allows synthesis of large quantity of highly fluorinated diamines
has been proposed. These diamines were used as the precursors for
the newly developed benzoxazine compounds. The structure of
these diamine-based benzoxazine monomers has been verified by
1H, 13C and 19F NMR and infrared spectroscopy.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of
Sekisui Integrated Research.
References
[1] L.A. Wall, Fluoropolymers, Wiley-Intersciene, New York, USA, 1972.
[2] M. Bruma, F. Mercer, J. Fitch, P.E. Cassidy, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 56 (1995) 527.
[3] D.A. Scola, M. Wai, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 52 (1994) 421.
[4] F.A. Rasoul, D.J.T. Hill, J.S. Forsythe, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 58 (1995) 1857–1864.
[5] G. Hougham, G. Tesoro, J. Shaw, Macromolecules 27 (1994) 3642–3649.
[6] T. Omote, K. Koseki, T. Yamaoka, Polym. Eng. Sci. 29 (1989) 945–949.
[7] T. Matsura, S. Ando, S. Sasai, F. Yamamoto, Macromolecules 27 (1994) 6665–6670.
[8] F.W. Mercer, M.T. McKenzie, High Perform. Polym. 5 (1993) 97–106.
[9] H. Treichel, G. Ruhl, P. Ansmann, C. Muller, Microelectron. Eng. 40 (1998) 1–19.
[10] G. Maier, Prog. Polym. Sci. 26 (2001) 3–65.
[11] F.W. Holly, A.C. Cope, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 66 (1944) 1875.
[12] X. Ning, H. Ishida, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 32 (1994) 1121–1129.
[13] H. Ishida, H.Y. Low, Macromolecules 30 (1997) 1099–1106.
[14] J. Liu, H. Ishida, Polym. Polym. Compos. 10 (2002) 191–203.
[15] Y.-C. Su, F.-C. Chang, Polymer 44 (2003) 7989–7996.
[16] M. Kanchanasopa, N. Yanument, K. Hemivichian, H. Ishida, Polym. Polym. Com-
pos. 6 (2001) 367–375.
[17] C.H. Lin, S.L. Chang, H.H. Lee, H.C. Chang, K.Y. Hwang, A.P. Tu, W.C. Su, J. Polym.
Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 46 (2008) 4970–4983.
[18] O. Mitsunobu, Synthesis (1981) 1–28.
[19] E. Fabiano, B.T. Golding, M.M. Sadeghi, Synthesis 2 (1987) 190–192.
[20] R.B. Greenwald, J. Org. Chem. 41 (1976) 1469–1470.
[21] T. Ball, R. Henrie, J. Fluorine Chem. 21 (1989) 245.
[22] V.C.R. McLoughlin, J. Thrower, Tetrahedron 25 (1969) 5921–5940.
[23] P. Velez-Herrera, K. Doyama, H. Abe, H. Ishida, Mascromolecules 41 (2008) 9704–
9714.
[24] A.L. Vogel, A.R. Tatchell, B.S. Furnis, A.J. Hannaford, P.W.G. Smith, Vogel’s Textbook
of Practical Organic Chemistry, Longman, New York, 1989.
[25] T.W. Greene, P.G.M. Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, John Wiley &
Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 1999.
[26] Z. Brunovaska, J.P. Liu, H. Ishida, Macromol. Chem. Phys 200 (1999) 1745–1752.
[27] R. Andreu, M.A. Espinosa, M. Galia, J. Cadiz, J. Ronda, J.A. Reina, J. Polym. Sci., Part
A: Polym. Chem. 44 (2006) 1529–1540.
[28] D.J. Allen, H. Ishida, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 101 (2006) 2798–2809.
[29] J. Dunkers, H. Ishida, Spectrochim. Acta 51A (1995) 1061–1074.
[30] N.B. Colthup, L.H. Daly, S.E. Wiberley, Introduction to Infrared and Raman
Spectroscopy, Academic Press, California, USA, 1990.
3.2.2. Infrared spectroscopy
The infrared spectra of the benzoxazine monomers are
presented in Fig. 10. There are a number of infrared bands that
are common to both spectra. The presence of the benzoxazine ring
aromatic ether is confirmed by the absorbance peak at 1223 cmꢀ1
and 1038 cmꢀ1, due to the C–O–C antisymmetric and symmetric
stretching modes, respectively [29]. The absorbance at 932 cmꢀ1
and 926 cmꢀ1 are characteristic modes of benzene with an
attached oxazine ring. The band at 1501 cmꢀ1 is characteristic
[31] H.D. Kim, H. Ishida, J. Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 3271–3280.