In addition, most of them lack the desired selectivity for the
HIF-1 signaling pathway or toxicity profiles required for a
useful therapeutic agent.
achieve the 2,3-cis-3,4-trans-4,5-cis-tetrahydrofuran moiety
of the natural products and preliminary structure-activity
relationships.
Figure 1 describes our approach to the synthesis of
manassantins A (1) and B (2). Previously, we reported a
stereoselective synthesis of 2,3-cis-3,4-trans-4,5-trans- and
2,3-trans-3,4-trans-4,5-trans-tetrahydrofurans via BF3·OEt2-
promoted reductive deoxygenation of cyclic hemiketals.8 The
stereochemical outcome was rationalized on the basis of
Woerpel’s “inside attack” model.9 Based on the same
rationale, we envisioned that the organozinc reagent 4 would
be added to the sterically more favorable conformation (B)
of the 2-benzenesulfonyl cyclic ether 5 from the inside face
of the envelope conformer to stereoselectively provide the
2,3-cis-3,4-trans-4,5-cis-tetrahydrofuran (3a). This core tet-
rahydrofuran unit 3a could be coupled to the appropriate side
arms via SN2 reactions to complete the synthesis of 1 and 2.
As shown in Scheme 1, reduction of 68 with DIBALH
Interestingly, the dineolignans manassantins A (1) and B
(2) (Figure 1), isolated from the aquatic plant Saururus
Scheme 1. Nucleophilic Addition of
(4-Benzyloxy-3-methoxyphenyl)zinc(II) Bromide to
2-Benzenesulfonyl Cyclic Ether
Figure 1. Retrosynthetic plan for manassantins A (1) and B (2).
cernuus L., have been shown to be potent inhibitors of HIF-
1.6 However, their molecular mechanisms of action have yet
to be established. Hanessian and co-workers recently reported
the first total synthesis of 1 and 2 as well as confirmed the
absolute configuration of the natural products.7 In broad
connection with our interest in the stereoselective synthesis
of tetrasubstituted tetrahydrofurans,8 we undertook the
synthesis of 1 and 2 to develop a synthetic route to the natural
products that would be easily amenable to the development
of analogues for biological studies. Herein, we report a
synthesis of 1 and 2 through nucleophilic addition of an
organozinc reagent to a 2-benzenesulfonyl cyclic ether to
followed by treatment with PhSO2H and camphorsulfonic
acid provided the 2-benzenesulfonyl cyclic ether 5.10 Un-
fortunately, the key nucleophilic substitution reaction of 5
with (4-benzyloxy-3-methoxyphenyl)zinc(II) bromide 4,
derived in situ from (4-benzyloxy-3-methoxyphenyl)mag-
nesium bromide and ZnBr2,10 provided a 2:1 diastereomeric
mixture of 2,5-diaryl-3,4-dimethyl tetrahydrofurans. Careful
1
analysis of H NMR spectral data revealed that the major
diastereomer had the desired 2,3-cis-3,4-trans-4,5-cis-con-
figuration (3a) and the minor diastereomer had the 2,3-cis-
3,4-trans-4,5-trans-configuration (3b). We reasoned that the
(6) (a) Rao, K. V.; Alvarez, F. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4947–
4950. (b) Hodges, T. W.; Hossain, C. F.; Kim, Y.-P.; Zhou, Y.-D.; Nagle,
D. G. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 767–771. (c) Hossain, C. F.; Kim, Y.-P.;
Baerson, S. R.; Zhang, L.; Bruick, R. K.; Mohammed, K. A.; Agarwal,
A. K.; Nagle, D. G.; Zhou, Y.-D. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005,
333, 1026–1033.
(9) (a) Shaw, J. T.; Woerpel, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6706–
6707. (b) Larsen, C. H.; Riggway, B. H.; Shaw, J. T.; Woerpel, K. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12208–12209. (c) Shaw, J. T.; Woerpel, K. A.
Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 8747–8756. (d) Bear, T. J.; Shaw, J. T.; Woerpel,
K. A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2056–2064. (e) Smith, D. M.; Woerpel,
K. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2063–2066.
(7) Hanessian, S.; Reddy, G. J.; Chahal, N. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5477–
5480.
(10) (a) Brown, D. S.; Ley, S. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4869–
4872. (b) Brown, D. S.; Bruno, M.; Davenport, R. J.; Ley, S. V. Tetrahedron
1989, 45, 4293–4308.
(8) Kim, H.; Wooten, C. M.; Park, Y.; Hong, J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3965–
3968.
90
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 1, 2009