spectroscopic data were entirely consistent with the natural
product, in 56% overall yield from 10.
This straightforward procedure for the selective sequential C-
6 NH2 and C-1 CO2H amide formation should be applicable to
the rapid generation of libraries of analogues of sperabillins D
4 and B 2 and hence allow construction of detailed structure–
activity relationships, as evidenced by its application to the first
asymmetric synthesis of sperabillin B 214 (Scheme 3), whose
spectroscopic data were entirely consistent with those of the
natural product.
In conclusion, a concise route to the core b,e-diamino-g-
hydroxy fragment 10 has been developed (in 19.3% yield from
methyl acrylate) and a novel protection strategy utilised to
complete the syntheses of the highly functionalised antibiotics
sperabillins B 2 and D 4. The first asymmetric total synthesis of
sperabillin B 2 was achieved in 5.8% overall yield from methyl
acrylate (30% from 10). An efficient total synthesis of
sperabillin D 4 has been achieved in 10.8% overall yield (56%
from 10).
Rhoˆne-Poulenc Roˆrer (R. J. K.) and EPSRC (A. J. P. M.) are
gratefully acknowledged for funding.
Notes and references
1 (a) S. Harada and H. Ono, Eur. Pat. Appl., 1986, EP 206068; (b) N.
Katayama, Y. Nozaki, S. Tsubotani, M. Kondo, S. Harada and H. Ono,
J. Antibiot., 1992, 45, 10.
2 N. Katayama, Y. Nozaki, S. Tsubotani, M. Kondo, S. Harada and H.
Ono, J. Antibiot., 1992, 45, 10.
3 T. Hida, S. Tsubotani, A. Hori, M. Murakami, H. Natsugari, Y. Kozai
and S. Harada, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1993, 41, 889.
4 T. Hida, S. Tsubotani, Y. Funabashi, H. Ono and S. Harada, Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn., 1993, 66, 863.
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: (i) acetone (15 mL), 3 Å molecular
sieves, Hunig’s base (1.52 mmol, 2 eq), reflux, 1 h then sorbyl chloride
(0.863 mmol), Hunig’s base (0.863 mmol), 0 °C to room temperature, 18 h;
(ii) Boc2O (0.74 mmol, 1.5 eq), NaHCO3 (1.47 mmol), MeOH (15 mL), 72
h; (iii) NaOH (aq) (1.65 mmol, 4 eq), THF/MeOH (2 : 1, 15 mL), 18 h; (iv)
DCC (0.08 mmol, 1.35 eq), HOBt (0.071 mmol), THF (2 mL), 3 Å
molecular sieves, 3 h, then 3-aminopropionamidine dihydrobromide (0.059
mmol), NaHCO3 (0.12 mmol), THF/H2O (10 : 1, 20 mL), 48 h; (v) TFA (1
mL, excess), DCM (1 mL), 30 min then Amberlite IRA-402 (Cl2 form).
5 S. Hashiguchi, A. Kawada and H. Natsugari, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 1991, 2435.
6 M. Hamada, T. Takeuchi, S. Kondo, Y. Ikeda, H. Naganawa, K. Maeda,
Y. Okami and H. Umezawa, J. Antibiot., 1970, 23, 171.
7 S. G. Davies and O. Ichihara, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 9313.
8 P. Grenouillet, D. Neibecker and I. Tkatchenko, Fr. Demande, 1987, FR
86-4644 19860327.
HOBt. The purity of the highly polar amidine product was
ensured by work-up with MP-carbonate scavenger resin.12
Acidic global deprotection afforded sperabillin D 4,13 whose
9 S. G. Davies and D. R. Fenwick, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995,
1109.
10 S. G. Davies, K. Iwamoto, C. A. P. Smethurst, A. D. Smith and H.
Rodriguez-Solla, Synlett, 2002, 7, 1146.
11 G. Hilgetag, H. Paul, J. Günther and M. Witt, Chem. Ber., 1964, 704.
12 J. J. Weidner, J. J. Parlow and D. L. Flynn, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
239.
13 Sperabillin D 4: [a]D25 +27.4 (c 0.22, H2O), lit.4 [a]2D5 +30.4 (c 0.50,
H2O); nmax/cm21 (KBr disc) 3387 (s), 1686 (m), 1654 (s), 1627 (m),
1612 (m), 1550 (m); dH (500 MHz, D2O) 0.96 (3H, d, J 7.0, CH3CHN),
1.47–1.62 (2H, m, CHCH2CH), 1.61 (3H, d, J 6.0, CH3CHNCH), 2.43
(2H, t, J 6.9, CH2CNN), 2.49 (2H, d, J 6.6, CH2CNO), 3.27–3.37 (2H, m,
NCH2), 3.60–3.65 (2H, m, CHOH and CH2CHCH2), 3.77 (1H, dq, J 7.0,
3.5, CH3CHN), 5.75 (1H, d, J 15.2, CHNCHCNO), 5.99–6.10 (2H, m,
CH3CHNCH), 6.90 (1H, dd, J 15.2, 9.9, CHNCHCNO); dC (125 MHz,
D2O) 18.4 (CH3CHN), 20.3 (CH3CHNCH), 34.9 (CH2CNN), 37.0
(CHCH2CH), 38.8 (CH2N), 39.5 (CH2CNO), 48.8 (CHNH2), 51.8
(CHNH), 72.0 (CHOH), 122.6 (CHNCHCNO), 131.6 (CH3CHNCH),
142.7 (CH3CHNCH), 144.9 (CHNCHCNO), 171.1, 171.3 (CNN and
CHNCHCNO), 174.2 (CH2CNO).
14 Sperabillin B 2: [a]2D2 +48.3 (c 0.24, H2O), lit.4 [a]D +56.0 (c 1.0, H2O);
nmax/cm21 (KBr disc) 3269 (m), 3068 (m), 1692 (s), 1654 (s), 1618 (s),
1609 (s), 1546 (s); dH (500 MHz, D2O) 1.10 (3H, d, J 6.7, CH3CHN),
1.61–1.74 (2H, m, CHCH2CH), 1.77 (3H, d, J 7.3, CH3CHNCH),
2.53–2.60 (2H, m, CH2CNN), 2.62 (2H, d, J 6.7, CH2CNO) 3.41–3.49
(2H, m, CH2N) 3.72–3.78 (2H, m, CH2CHCH2 and CHO), 3.92 (1H, qd,
J 6.7, 3.8, CH3CHNH), 5.91 (1H, dq, J 10.7, 7.3, CH3CHNCH), 5.97
(1H, d, J 15.2, CHNCHCNO), 6.12 (1H, app t, J 11.2, CH3CHNCH), 7.45
(1H, dd, J 15.2, 11.7, CHNCHCNO); dC (125 MHz, D2O) 13.6
(CH3CHNCH), 16.4 (CH3CHN), 35.0 (CH2CNN), 36.6 (CH2N and
CHCH2CH), 37.5 (CH2CNO), 46.7 (CH2CHCH2), 49.8 (CH3CHN),
70.0 (CHO), 122.8 (CHNCHCNO), 127.1 (CH3CHNCH), 136.9
(CH3CHNCH), 137.0 (C HNCHCNO), 169.2, 172.2 (CNNH, CH2CNO
and CHNCHCNO).
Scheme 3 Reagents and conditions: (i) acetone (15 mL), 3 Å molecular
sieves, Hunig’s base (1.70 mmol, 2 eq), reflux, 1 h then (2E,4Z)-
hexadienoyl chloride15 (0.933 mmol), Hunig’s base (0.933 mmol), 0 °C to
room temperature, 18 h; (ii) Boc2O (0.681 mmol, 1.5 eq), NaHCO3 (1.36
mmol), MeOH (15 mL), 72 h; (iii) NaOH (aq) (0.509 mmol, 4 eq), THF/
MeOH (2 : 1, 4.5 mL), 5 h; (iv) DCC (0.115 mmol, 1.35 eq), HOBt (0.102
mmol), THF (2 mL), 3 Å molecular sieves, 3 h then 3-aminopropionamidine
dihydrobromide (0.085 mmol), NaHCO3 (0.170 mmol), THF/H2O (10 : 1,
20 mL), 48 h; (v) TFA (1 mL, excess), DCM (3 mL), 30 min then
preparative reverse-phase HPLC then Amberlite IRA-402 (Cl2 form).
15 (2E,4Z)-Hexadienyl chloride was synthesised as > 95 : 5 (2E,4Z) :
(2E,4E) via Heck type coupling of tert-butyl acrylate and (Z)-1-bromo-
1-propene.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2132–2133
2133