Scheme 1
.
Structures of Resolvins and EPA and Retrosynthesis
of Resolvin E2
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Both Enantiomers of 6
Both enantiomers of 6 were prepared from methyl ester
(+)-10 (Scheme 2).9 The critical desymmetrization of meso-7
into (+)-10 was realized using a catalytic amount of the
quinine derivative 9, according to the conditions developed
by Song.10,11 Namely, 1 mol % of 9 and 10 equiv of
methanol were applied to 7 in Et2O to generate (+)-10 in
highly enantioselective fashion (95% yield, 87% ee).12,13
Interestingly, methanolysis of the same 7 using the quinidine
derivative 8, the pseudo-enantiomer of 9, indeed gave the
enantiomeric (-)-10, albeit in lower enantioselectivity (64%
ee). Due to this, we decided to synthesize (-)- and (+)-6
from the same (+)-10 using chemoselective reduction of
either the carboxylic acid or the ester. Lactone (-)-6 was
prepared in three steps: conversion of the carboxylic acid of
(+)-10 into the acid chloride, followed by chemoselective
NaBH4 reduction,14 and subsequent acid-mediated cyclization
of methyl ester 11. The enantiomer (+)-6 was in turn
synthesized by LiEt3BH reduction15 of the methyl ester of
(+)-10 and subsequent cyclization of carboxylic acid 12
under acidic conditions.
strategy. Specifically, the stereocenters at C5 of 4 and C18
of 5 would be generated by substrate-controlled stereose-
lective addition of the corresponding carbon nucleophiles,
while the E,Z-olefins at C6 of 2 and C17 of 3 would be
constructed using a torquoselective thermal electrocyclic ring-
opening reaction5 of cyclobutene aldehydes 4 and 5, respec-
tively.6 Hence, the stereochemistries of the cyclobutane of
(-)- or (+)-6 were envisioned to be transferred to the
stereochemistries of the hydroxy group at C5 or C18 and
the diene at C6 or C17. A pair of optically active six-carbon
units 67 would be obtained from the known achiral meso-
anhydride 78 by enantioselective desymmetrization.
(5) For rationalization of torquoselectivity, see: (a) Rudolf, K.; Spell-
meyer, D. C.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 3708–3710. (b)
Niwayama, S.; Kallel, E. A.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Sheu, C.; Houk, K. N. J.
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2813–2825. (c) Dolvier, W. R., Jr.; Koroniak, H.;
Houk, K. N.; Sheu, C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 471–477.
Synthesis of the C1-10 fragment 2 started with reduction
of (-)-6 by DIBAL-H, followed by addition of Grignard
(6) Wallace demonstrated selective ring opening of cyclobutene alde-
hydes and substrate-controlled stereoselective introductions of various carbon
nucleophiles to disubstituted cyclobutenes: (a) Binns, F.; Hayes, R.; Ingham,
S.; Saengchantara, S. T.; Turner, R. W.; Wallace, T. W. Tetrahedron 1992,
48, 515–530. (b) Hodgetts, K. J.; Wallis, C. J.; Wallace, T. W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1994, 35, 4645–4648. (c) Hodgetts, K. J.; Wallis, C. J.; Wallace, T. W.
Synlett 1995, 1235. (d) Binns, F.; Hayes, R.; Hodgetts, K. J.; Saengchantara,
S. T.; Wallace, T. W.; Wallis, C. J. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 3631–3658.
(7) Enantioselective syntheses of (+)- and (-)-6 by enzymatic resolution
were reported: Gourdel-Martin, M.-E.; Comoy, C.; Huet, F. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1999, 10, 403–404. See also ref 6b and 6c.
(9) For a review of synthetic applications of lactone 6 and derivatives,
see: Gauvry, N.; Lescop, C.; Huet, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 520, 7–
5218.
(10) Oh, S. H.; Rho, H. S.; Lee, J. W.; Lee, J. E.; Youk, S. H.; Chin, J.;
Song, C. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7872–7875
.
(11) For a review of asymmetric alcoholysis of cyclic anhydrides, see:
Chen, Y.; McDaid, P.; Deng, L. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2965–2983
.
(12) Enantiomeric excess was determined from 1H NMR spectra of the
MTPA ester of alcohol 11.
(13) Absolute configuration of lactone 6 was deduced from the report
of Wallace and co-workers, see ref 6d.
(14) Fujisawa, T.; Mori, T.; Sato, T. Chem. Lett. 1983, 835–838.
(15) Brown, H. C.; Kim, S. C.; Krishnamurthy, S. J. Org. Chem. 1980,
45, 1–12.
(8) (a) Koltzenburg, G.; Fuss, P. G.; Leitich, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966,
29, 3409–3414. (b) Brauman, J. I.; Archie, W. C., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1972, 94, 4262–4265. (c) Gauvry, N.; Comoy, C.; Lescop, C.; Huet, F.
Synthesis 1999, 574–576.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 16, 2009
3603