C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Ni-Catalyzed Arylation of Quinoline with Various
are notoriously poor substrates in catalytic direct arylation reactions.
Additional scope and mechanistic studies are ongoing.
Arylzincsa
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge valuable sugges-
tions by the reviewers. This work was conducted by the Program of
Promotion of Environmental Improvement to Enhance Young Re-
searchers’ Independence, the Special Coordination Funds for Promoting
Science and Technology from MEXT, Japan. We also thank the
Instrumental Analysis Center, Faculty of Engineering, Osaka Univer-
sity, for assistance with the 2H NMR and HRMS analyses. I.H. thanks
the GCOE Program of Osaka University.
entry
Ar
yield (%)b
entry
Ar
yield (%)b
1
2
3
phenyl
3,5-Me2C6H3
2-naphthyl
73
71
56
4
5
6
4-(MeO)C6H4
4-(Me2N)C6H4
3-Cl-5-(MeO)C6H3
97
93
51
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental proce-
dures and characterization of products. This material is available free
a Reaction conditions: ArB(OH)2 (0.75 mmol) and ZnEt2 (1.05 mmol)
in dioxane (0.5 mL) at 60 °C for 12 h; quinoline (0.25 mmol), Ni(cod)2
(0.0125 mmol), and PCy3 (0.025 mmol) in toluene (1.0 mL) at 130 °C
for 20 h. b Isolated yield based on quinoline.
References
(1) Reviews published after 2008: (a) Li, B.-J.; Yang, S.-D.; Shi, Z.-J. Synlett
2008, 949. (b) Kakiuchi, F.; Kochi, T. Synthesis 2008, 3013. (c) Chen, X.;
Engle, K. M.; Wang, D.-H.; Yu, J.-Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5094.
(d) Colby, D. A.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. Chem. ReV., in press.
(2) A notable exception: (a) Berman, A. M.; Lewis, J. C.; Bergman, R. G.;
Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14926. Intramolecular
coupling: (b) Basolo, L.; Beccali, E. M.; Borsini, E.; Broggini, G.
Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 3486.
(3) Several transformations other than arylation via catalytic C-H bond
activation of pyridines have been reported. Carbonylation: (a) Moore, E. J.;
Pretzer, W. R.; O’Connell, T. J.; Harris, J.; LaBounty, L.; Chou, L.;
Grimmer, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5888. Alkenylation: (b)
Murakami, M.; Hori, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4720. (c) Nakao,
Y.; Kanyiva, K. S.; Hiyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2448.
Alkylation: (d) Lewis, J. C.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 5332. Borylation: (e) Takagi, J.; Sato, K.; Hartwig, J. F.;
Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 5649. Dimerization: (f)
Kawashima, T.; Takao, T.; Suzuki, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11006.
(4) The use of N-activated pyridines, such as N-oxides, provides a partial
solution to this issue. For leading references, see: (a) Larivee, A.; Mousseau,
J. J.; Charette, A. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 52. (b) Cho, S. H.;
Hwang, S. J.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9254. (c) Campeau,
L.-C.; Stuart, D. R.; Leclerc, J.-P.; Bertrand-Laperle, M.; Villemure, E.;
Sun, H.-Y.; Lasserre, S.; Guimond, N.; Lecavallier, M.; Fagnou, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3291.
We next turned our attention to the scope of arylzinc reagents.
After extensive studies,10 arylzinc reagents prepared by treatment
of readily available arylboronic acids with diethylzinc proved to
be effective aryl donors in this Ni-catalyzed reaction (Table 2).11
Although the reactions required higher temperatures than those using
5, an array of aryl groups could be introduced through this
procedure. Functional groups such as ethers (entry 4), amines (entry
5), and chlorides (entry 6) were tolerated under these conditions.
Moreover, heteroarylzinc reagents prepared by Nakamura’s pro-
cedure12 could also be employed, further demonstrating the utility
of this catalytic arylation (eq 1).
(5) An approach based on the radical process has also been reported, although
it is still in its infancy from the synthetic point of view. For leading
examples, see: (a) Yanagisawa, S.; Ueda, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Itami, K. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 4673. (b) Li, M.; Hua, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1478.
(c) Kobayashi, O.; Uraguchi, D.; Yamakawa, T. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2679.
(6) For a comprehensive discussion of these two mechanisms, see: (a) Lie´gault,
B.; Lapointe, D.; Caron, L.; Vlassova, A.; Fagnou, K. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 1826.
(7) (a) Boulton, A. J.; McKillop, A. In ComprehensiVe Heterocyclic Chemistry;
Katrizky, A. R., Rees, C. W., Eds.; Pergamon: New York, 1984; Vol. 2,
pp 262-270. (b) Geissman, T. A.; Schlatter, M. J.; Webb, I. D.; Roberts,
J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1946, 11, 741. (c) Pijper, P. J.; van der Goot, H.;
Timmerman, H.; Nauta, W. T. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 19, 399. (d)
Goldstein, S. W.; Dambek, P. Synthesis 1989, 221.
Although a complete picture of the catalytic cycle remains
elusive, several observations are worth noting. First, treatment of
dihydroquinoline 13 with 5 afforded 6, presumably via zinc amide
14,13 eVen in the absence of a nickel catalyst at room temperature
(eq 2):
(8) For example, see: (a) ArB(OH)2: Yamamoto, Y. Synlett 2007, 1913. (b)
ArZnX: Hossain, K. M.; Kameyama, T.; Shibata, T.; Takagi, K. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 2001, 74, 2415.
(9) Yields with other metal complexes in place of Ni(cod)2 in the reaction of
quinoline with 5: Pd(OAc)2, 15%; Cu(OTf)2, 16%; [RhCl(cod)]2, 38%; none,
0%. See the Supporting Information for complete data from the screening
of arylating agents, oxidants, catalysts, and ligands.
(10) The reaction is sensitive to the contaminated metal salts, as is often encountered
in the reaction using organozinc reagents (see the Supporting Information).
(11) Among several protocols, the following one afforded the highest yields: Smith,
S. W.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12645.
(12) (a) Nakamura, M.; Ilies, L.; Otsubo, S.; Nakamura, E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 944. (b) Nakamura, M.; Ilies, L.; Otsubo, S.; Nakamura, E.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2803.
(13) Zinc amides formed by the reaction of diorganozinc and chelating diamines
have been characterized: Hlavinka, M. L.; Hagadorn, J. R. Organometallics
2005, 24, 4116.
This finding suggests that the arylation is initiated by the nickel-
catalyzed dearomatizing 1,2-addition of an arylnickel species,14 as
proposed in Scheme 1b. However, the subsequent aromatization
event is more likely to occur via a zinc amide species similar to
14, which can be formed under the catalytic conditions via
transmetalation between nickel amide 3 (m ) Ni) and 5 rather than
ꢀ-hydrogen elimination of 3 (m ) Ni). Alternatively, zinc amide
14 could also be generated by the reaction of 5 with an azanick-
elacyclopropane intermediate, which can be formed via coordination
of the CdN bond in quinoline to a nickel center.15 Second, a
deuterium substituted at the 2-position of quinoline is finally
incorporated into one of the phenyl groups in 5 to form deuteri-
(14) Although the exact structure of the arylnickel species remains to be clarified,
one possibility is a nickelate complex. For a proposal of a similar nickelate
complex, see: Terao, J.; Nii, S.; Chowdhury, F. A.; Nakamura, A.; Kambe,
N. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 905.
(15) For a proposal of azanickelacyclopropanes from imines, see: Ohashi, M.;
Kishizaki, O.; Ikeda, H.; Ogoshi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9161.
(16) In the catalytic arylation reactions and the reaction shown in eq 2, metallic
precipitates were observed upon completion of the reactions. The metallic
precipitates dissolved with gas evolution upon addition of aqueous HCl.
On the basis of these observations, we currently believe that 5 is finally
reduced to metallic Zn(0).
2
obenzene, as was confirmed by H NMR measurements of the
arylation reaction of deuterated quinoline (see eq S1 in the
Supporting Information). This observation indicates that 5 functions
as both an aryl donor and an oxidant.16
In conclusion, we have developed a catalytic 1,2-addition-based
approach to the arylation of electron-deficient heteroaryls, which
JA9053509
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 34, 2009 12071