The photoactivated 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction was
first reported by Huisgen and co-workers between 2,5-
diphenyltetrazole and methyl crotonate in benzene.5a The
presence of the short-lived nitrile imine intermediate was
Table 1. Photoactivated 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of 1a and
2a in Various Solventsa
established by the 15N-labeled fragmentation study.7
A
remarkable rate acceleration was observed when the reaction
was performed in aqueous medium,8 consistent with a
concerted reaction mechanism. However, in all the photo-
activation approaches, an intense 450-W Hanovia immersion
lamp with broad emission spectrum was used, severely
limiting the range of applications suitable for the reaction.
As a result, there were only a few reports in the literature in
the past 40 years that utilized this photoactivation approach
for the synthesis of pyrazoline compounds.5b,c Herein, we
report an extremely mild photoactivation procedure that
allows for rapid synthesis of highly functionalized pyrazo-
lines from easily accessible diaryl-tetrazole building blocks.9
Because of high quantum yield of the photolysis (0.5-
0.9) in generating the reactive nitrile imine intermediate,10
we found that a hand-held benchtop UV lamp (UVP, 302
nm, 0.16 AMPS, typically used in the lab for TLC monitor-
ing) was sufficiently robust to initiate the reactions. In our
initial study, a reaction mixture containing 1 equiv of
tetrazole (1a) and 20 equiv of methyl methacrylate (2a) in
common organic solvents, as well as an EtOH/H2O solvent
mixture, was irradiated for 2 h at room temperature. In almost
all cases, pure product (3aa) was obtained in quantative
yields after evaporation of solvents and excess reagents
(Table 1), based on the 1H NMR and mass spectrometry data.
The cycloaddition was found to be insensitive to solvent
polarity (entries 1-10) and tolerant of protic solvents
including H2O (entries 2-4, 11). The reaction was highly
regioselective as the opposite regioisomer 3aa′ was not
observed in all conditions we tested. Further experiments
indicated that the amount of dipolarophile 2a can be reduced
to 1 equiv without detectable decrease in yield and regio-
selectivity.
yield (%)b
entry
solvent
3aa
3aa′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PhH
iPrOH
EtOH
MeOH
EtOAc
CH2Cl2
THF
hexane
MeCN
DMF
99.2
96.3
97.7
85.0
100
100
100
100
9
10
11
92.1
100
7:3 EtOH/H2O
100
a Reactions were conducted by irradiating 5.5 mg of 1a and 20 equiv of
2a in 2 mL of solvent in quartz test tubes. b Crude yields after evaporation
of solvent and excess 2a.
activation procedure, and the results are summarized in Table
2. The regiochemistry was determined by NMR signals of
the pyrazoline ring protons. All electron-deficient alkenes
gave excellent yields and exclusive regioselectivity with the
electron-withdrawing group residing at the C5-position, for
example, monosubstituted ethylenes (entries 2, 3) and gem-
disubstituted ethylenes (entries 7-9). It is noteworthy that
the in situ generated reactive nitrile imine reacted selectively
with alkenes over the nitrile and aldehyde groups (entries 2,
9). Simple alkenes such as 1-decene afforded the pyrazoline
product with a moderate yield after 2 h irradiation (entry
10). Conjugate alkenes such as styrene derivatives were also
efficient dipolarophiles (entries 11-19). Yields were gener-
ally higher when styrene rings carry electron-withdrawing
groups such as halogens and the cyano group (entries 14-
18). Interestingly, a cyclic styrene analog, indene, also
participated in this photoactivated cycloaddition, giving the
fused ring product with 87% isolated yield (entry 19). A
small amount of oxidized pyrazole products was isolated for
methyl acrylate and styrene dipolarophiles (entries 1, 11);
however, it appears the occurrence is structure-dependent
because it was not observed for other dipolarophiles we
tested. For electron-rich alkenes such as n-butyl vinyl ether,
tetrazine (dimer of nitrile imine) was isolated instead of the
pyrazoline adduct, presumably due to MO mismatch between
the nitrile imine dipole and the electron-rich dipolarophiles.11
Next, we examined the reactivity of a range of 1,3-
dipolarophiles toward tetrazole 1a using this mild photo-
(3) (a) Wang, Y. G.; Zhang, J.; Lin, X. F. Syn. Lett. 2003, 10, 1467-
1468. (b) Sibi, M. P.; Stanley, L. M.; Jasperse, C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 8276-8277. (c) Manyem, S.; Sibi, M. P.; Lushington, G. H.;
Neuenswander, B.; Schoenen, F.; Aube, J. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9, 20-
28.
(4) (a) Huisgen, R.; Seidel, M.; Sauer, J.; McFarland, J. W.; Wallbillich,
G. J. Org. Chem. 1959, 24, 892-893. (b) Huisgen, M.; Seidel, M.;
Wallbillich, G.; Knupfer, H. Tetrahedron 1962, 17, 3-29. (c) Atir, R.;
Mallouk, S.; Bougrin, K.; Soufiaoui, M. Synth. Commun. 2006, 36, 111-
120.
(5) (a) Clovis, J. S.; Eckell, A.; Huisgen, R.; Sustmann, R. Chem. Ber.
1967, 100, 60-70. (b) Angadiyavar, C. S.; George, M. V. J. Org. Chem.
1971, 36, 1589-1594. (c) Padwa, A.; Nahm, S.; Sato, E. J. Org. Chem.
1978, 43, 1664-1671.
(6) For a recent example, see: Manetsch, R.; Krasinski, A.; Radic, Z.;
Raushel, J.; Taylor, P.; Sharpless, K. B.; Kolb, H. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 12809-12818.
(7) Toubro, N. H.; Holm, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 2093-2094.
(8) (a) Molteni, G.; Orlandi, M.; Broggini, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2000, 3742-3745. (b) Molteni, G.; Ponti, A.; Orlandi, M. New J.
Chem. 2002, 26, 1340-1345.
(9) (a) Ito, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Kakehi, A.; Kondo, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1976, 49, 1920-1923. (b) Ito, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Kakehi, A. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1976, 49, 762-766.
(10) Lohse, V.; Leihkauf, P.; Csongar, C.; Tomaschewski, G. J. Prakt.
Chem. 1988, 330, 406-414.
(11) (a) Houk, K. N.; Sims, J.; Watts, C. R.; Luskus, L. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1973, 95, 7301-7315. (b) Houk, K. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8, 361-
369.
4156
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 21, 2007