Enantiopure Dendritic Polyoxometalates
COMMUNICATION
C108H156 N3PW4O30: C 47.29, H 5.73, W 26.81; found: C 47.18, H 5.99, W
27.48; (R)-(+)-6: [a]D20 =67.3 (c=10À2 gmLÀ1, CHCl3); CD (c=2.3.10À5 m,
CH3CN): 222 (De=5.3) and 297 nm (De=À0.6); (S)-(À)-6: [a]2D0 =À67.6
(c=10À2 gmLÀ1, CHCl3); CD (c=2.3.10À5 m, CH3CN): 219 (De=À5.6)
and 297 nm (De=+0.2).
the CD and VCD reported data, clearly demonstrate and
confirm a chirality extention from the enantiopure dendritic
wedges to the POM cluster and their close interaction in so-
lution.
Compound 7: Yield 70%; 1H NMR (250.13 MHz, DMSO, TMS): d=
In conclusion, we have built enantiopure dendritic POM
frameworks by assembling chiral dendritic amines and
acidic POM moieties. Compounds 6 and 7 represent the first
examples of enantiopure dendritic POM hybrids. The solu-
tion CD, UV/Vis and VCD data of 6 indicate a significant
induced optical activity in the POM cluster. In addition,
compound 6 selectively oxidizes thioanisole to the corre-
sponding chiral sulfoxide with 14% ee. Despite the modest
ee, the present reaction demonstrates chirality transfer to
the POM unit in an asymmetric transformation. We believe
that the appropriate elaboration of optimized dendritic
structures will enable the use of a range of POM species,
and represents a promising approach to efficient, recovera-
ble, and highly enantioselective dendritic POM future cata-
lysts. Further work in this area is in progress.
À
7.66–7.29 (m, 39H; Ar), 4.49 (q, 3H; CH), 4.43 (dd, 12H; CH2 N), 3.71–
À
À
4.15 (br, 18H; CH2 O, CH O, and CH2), 1.86 ppm (d, 24H; CH2);
13C NMR (62.91 MHz, DMSO, TMS): d=145.0 (Cq, Ar), 137.7 (Cq, Ar),
134.6 (CH, Ar), 127.6 (CH, Ar), 125.3 (CH, Ar), 117.0 (CH, Ar), 114.4
À
À
(Cq, Ar), 79.1 (CHO), 74.6 (Cq OH), 64.8 (CH2 O), 56.6 (CH), 52.6
À
À
(CH2 N), 46.4 (CH2 CHO), 41.1 (CH), 30.2 (CH2), 15.1 ppm (CH3);
31P NMR (81.02 MHz, DMSO, 858 H3PO4): d=À10.51 ppm (PO4); IR
(KBr pellet): n=3413 (brs), 2955 (s), 2932 (s), 2859 (s), 1722 (m), 1679
À
À
(w), 1632 (m), 1087 (s, P O), 968 (s, W=O), 845 (s, O O), 574 (m),
548 cmÀ1 (w); elemental analysis calcd (%) for C108H132 N3PW4O42: C
44.57, H 4.57, W 25.27; found: C 45.36, H 4.76, W 25.98. (R)-(+)-7:
[a]2D0 =64.3 (c=10À2 gmLÀ1
,
DMSO); (S)-(À)-7: [a]2D0 =À64.0 (c=
10À2 gmLÀ1, DMSO).
General procedure for catalytic reactions and catalyst recycling: The
POM catalyst 6 (4.10À3 mmol) and thioanisole 8 (250 equiv) were dis-
solved in CDCl3 (1 mL). An aqueous solution of H2O2 (35%, 800 equiv)
was added to the reaction mixture at the appropriate temperature. The
latter was stirred and monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Upon reac-
tion completion, the catalyst was precipitated by addition of Et2O
(5 mL). The solid was filtered, washed with diethyl ether (3ꢂ2 mL), and
dried under vacuum to yield the POM catalyst as a white solid, which
was analyzed by 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopy before its use in a new
catalytic experiment. The diethyl ether solution was evaporated under
vacuum and the sulfoxide was purified by chromatography on a silica-gel
column (petroleum ether/diethyl ether 1:9; v/v). The enantiomeric excess-
es were determined by chiral HPLC by using a Chiralcel ASH column,
UV detector (254 nm), eluting with hexane/isopropanol (1:1) at a flow
rate of 0.5 mLminÀ1. Retention time: (R)-9 22.5, (S)-9 30.9 min.[11]
Experimental Section
General procedure for the synthesis of enantiopure dendritic POM 6 and
7: For the synthesis of the amino dibenzoate compounds, a mixture of
the corresponding enantiomerically pure 1-phenylethylamine, methyl 4-
(bromomethyl)benzoate, and N,N-diisopropylethylamine in CH3CN was
stirred for 24 h at 308C. After removal of the solvent under vacuum, the
residue was extracted with diethyl ether, washed with water, and dried
over sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed under vacuum and the
product was purified by chromatography on a silica-gel column, eluting
with a petroleum ether/diethyl ether (9:1; v/v) mixture. The enantiopure
amino tetraallyl dicarbinol was prepared by adding a diethyl ether solu-
tion of amino dibenzoate to a diethyl ether solution of freshly prepared
allylmagnesium bromide. The mixture was stirred at 308C for 12 h, then
a water solution of NH4Cl 6m was added, and the organic layer was
washed with water and dried over Na2SO4. After removal of the solvent
under vacuum, the product was purified by chromatography on a silica-
gel column, eluting with a petroleum ether/diethyl ether (7:3; v/v) mix-
ture. The corresponding amino tetra-n-propyl dicarbinol was prepared by
adding Pd/C catalyst (10%) to a solution of an amino tetraallyl com-
pound in THF in a thick-walled tube capped with a Youngꢃs stop-cock.
The tube was flushed, pressurized with hydrogen, sealed, and stirred at
room temperature for 3 h. The solvent was removed under vacuum, the
residue was extracted with diethyl ether, and the solution was filtered
through celite and evaporated. Then, the enantiopure dendritic polyoxo-
metalate salts were prepared by adding H2O2 (35% in water) to a solu-
tion of commercially available heteropolyacid H3PW12O40 in water. The
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min, then a CH2Cl2 solu-
tion of the tetra-branched amino dicarbinol compound was added, and
the mixture was stirred for an additional hour. For 6, the CH2Cl2 layer
was dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated under vacuum, providing the de-
sired dendritic POM material as a light-yellow solid, whereas the CH2Cl2
insoluble 7 was collected as a precipitate.
Acknowledgements
Financial Support from the ANR-06-BLAN-0215 grant (C.J., S.N., and
F.A.), the University of Bordeaux 1, the CNRS, the ESF COST D40
action, the Region Aquitaine, and the University of Padova, is gratefully
acknowledged. We thank Prof. S. Quideau and Dr. D. Deffieux (ISM) for
helpful discussions and HPLC facilities, and Ms. Gloria Modugno for CD
experiments.
Keywords: asymmetric oxidation
·
chirality transfer
·
dendrimers
dichroism
·
polyoxometalates
·
vibrational circular
[2] a) D. A. J. Judd, H. Nettles, N. Nevins, J. P. Snyder, D. C. Liotta, J.
123, 886–897; b) A. Mꢅller, F. Peters, M. T. Pope, D. Gattesschi,
Sartorel, G. Scorrano, C. Maccato, M. H. Dickmann, U. Kortz, M.
[3] a) T. A. Sullens, R. A. Jensen, T. Y. Shvareva, T. E. Albrecht-
ligkos, B. Hasenknopf, P. Gouzerh, E. Lacꢆte, S. Thorimbert, M.
Compound 6 : Yield 84%; 1H NMR (250.13 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): d=
À
7.52–7.03 (br; Ar), 4.38–3.70 (br; CH and CH2 N), 2.21 (s; OH), 2.02 (d;
CH3), 1.67 (br; CH2), 1.17 (br; CH2), 0.97 (br; CH2), 0.74 ppm (br; CH3);
13C NMR (62.91 MHz, CDCl3, TMS): d=145.2 (Cq, Ar), 143.3 (Cq, Ar),
138.6ACHTUNGTRENNUNG(Cq, Ar), 128.5 (CH, Ar), 128.3 (CH, Ar), 128.2 (CH, Ar), 126.9
À
À
(Cq, Ar), 125.3 (CH, Ar), 77.3 (Cq OH), 56.2 (CH), 53.5 (CH2 N), 45.5
(CH2), 17.0 (CH2), 14.7 (CH3), 13.6 ppm (CH3); 31P NMR (81.02 MHz,
CDCl3, 858 H3PO4): d=3.26 ppm (PO4); IR (KBr pellet): n=3479 (brs),
À
2957 (s), 2932 (s), 2871 (s), 1724 (m), 1109 (m), 1053 (m, P O), 947 (m,
À1
À
W=O), 852 (m, O O), 577 cm (w); elemental analysis calcd (%) for
Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 8703 – 8708
ꢁ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
8707