A. Chandra Shekhar et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 7099–7101
7101
LA
LA
OH
O
O
-LA
RNHCHO
OH
HCOOH + LA
-H2O
H2N-R
H
NHR
H
H
Scheme 3. Mechanism of Lewis acid-catalyzed N-formylation of amines with formic acid.
Shen, Z.; Skoumbourdis, A. P.; Barrish, J. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 5453; (c)
Jackson, A.; Meth-Cohn, O. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 1319.
2. Downie, I. M.; Earle, M. J.; Heaney, H.; Shuhaibar, K. F. Tetrahedron 1993, 49,
4015.
3. Kobayashi, S.; Nishio, K. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 56, 6620.
4. Kobayashi, S.; Yasuda, M.; Hachiya, I. Chem. Lett. 1996, 407.
5. Hartinez, J.; Laur, J. Synthesis 1982, 979.
6. (a) Kraus, N. A. Synthesis 1973, 361; (b) Kizuka, H.; Elmaleh, D. R. Nucl. Med. Biol.
1993, 20, 239.
7. Blicke, F. F.; Lu, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 3933.
When compared to formic acid, higher carboxylic acids are
more resistant to amidation. In our study, the reactions of acetic
acid and propionic acid with anilines in the presence of ZnCl2 have
produced the corresponding amides in moderate yields (55% and
50%, respectively) upon heating at 70 °C for 12 h and the long chain
carboxylic acids such as decanoic acid and levulinic acid remained
unreactive with aniline upon heating at 100 °C for 24 h.
The esters of formic acid such as phenyl formate and pentaflu-
orophenyl formate were useful reagents for direct N-formylation
without requiring any catalyst.10 However, these reagents are
expensive and not readily available. Unlike these aryl formats,
ethyl formate is highly sluggish and recently, TiCl3(OTf)17 and sil-
ica-bonded N-propylsulfamic acid18 were reported to be effective
catalysts for N-formylation using ethyl formate. When compared
to these procedures, the present protocol is more advantageous
as the reagents are inexpensive and easily available. This method
is simple and applicable to a variety of amines.
In conclusion, we have developed a novel and efficient method
for N-formylation of an amine using formic acid as a formylating
agent and ZnCl2 as a catalyst. This Letter describes first the obser-
vation of Lewis acid-catalyzed N-formylation of amines using for-
mic acid and it offers a simple, economical, environment friendly
method for N-formylation of amines.
8. Waki, J.; Meinhofer, J. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 2019.
9. Chen, F. M. F.; Benoiton, N. L. Synthesis 1979, 709.
10. (a) Yale, H. L. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 3238; (b) Kisfaludy, L.; Laszlo, O. Synthesis
1987, 510; (c) Duezek, W.; Deutsch, J.; Vieth, S.; Niclas, H. J. Synthesis 1996, 37.
11. Mihara, M.; Ishino, Y.; Minakara, S.; Komatsu, M. Synthesis 2003, 2317.
12. Das, B.; Krishnaiah, M.; Balasubramanyam, P.; Veeranjaneyulu, B.; Nandan
kumar, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 2225.
13. Reddy, P. G.; Kumar, G. D. K.; Bhaskaran, S. Tetrahedron 2000, 41, 9149.
14. Luca, L. D.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcheddu, A.; Salaris, M. Synlett 2004, 2570.
15. (a) Shanthan Rao, P.; Venkataratnam, R. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 5821; (b)
Sridhar, M.; Ramanaiah, B. C.; Narsaiah, Ch.; Mahesh, B.; Kumaraswamy, M.;
Kishore Kumar, M.; Vishnu Murthy, A.; Shanthan Rao, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009,
50, 3897.
16. General procedure for N-formylation of an amine: 2-Amino-5,6,7,8-terahydro-
4H-cyclohepta[b]thiophene-3-carbonitrile (0.5 g, 2.6 mmol) and anhydrous
ZnCl2 (35 mg, 0.26 mmol) were taken in a 50 ml round bottomed flask fitted
with a calcium chloride guard tube. To the mixture, formic acid (0.3 ml,
7.8 mmol) was added drop-wise with constant stirring for 10 min. This
mixture was heated at 70 °C for 1 h and the progress of the reaction was
monitored by TLC. When the reaction was completed, the mixture was cooled
to room temperature and diluted with ethyl acetate (40 ml). The organic layer
was washed with water (2 Â 10 ml), brine (2 Â 10 ml) and dried over anhyd
Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the resulting
crude product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel—100–200
mesh, ethyl acetate/hexane 1:10) to obtain the corresponding N-formyl
derivative, 2l (0.53 g, 92%, mp 194–196 °C), which gave satisfactory spectral
data as follows: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): d ppm 1.45 (m, 3H), 1.7 (m, 5H), 1.9
(m, 2H), 8.45 (s, 1H), 9.2 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): d ppm 23.1, 28.6,
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to Dr. J. S. Yadav, Director, IICT, Hyder-
abad, for his constant encouragement and financial support from
an industry-sponsored project.
29.1, 31.2, 31.6, 67.4, 115.2, 128.8, 135.4, 148.8, 160.4; I.R. (KBr,
m
cmÀ1): 3397,
2210, 1679, 1565, 1450, 1113, 1026, 957; HRMS(ESI) for C11H11N2OS
References and notes
(MÀH+) = 219.059 (observed), 219.060 (calculated).
17. Firouzabadi, H.; Iranpoor, N.; Farahi, S. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2008, 289, 61.
18. Niknam, K.; Saberi, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 5210.
1. (a) Kobayashi, K.; Nagato, S.; Kawakita, M.; Morikawa, O.; Konishi, H. Chem.
Lett. 1995, 575; (b) Chen, B.-C.; Bendarz, M. S.; Zhao, R.; Sundeen, J. E.; Chen, P.;