approach to the highly functionalized oxazoles are rare.10
Therefore, developing a milder and more general procedure
to access polysubstituted oxazole derivatives is still highly
desirable.
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
Copper, among transition metals, is particularly attractive
in organic synthesis because of its low price, slight toxicity,
and environmentally benign feature.11 Collectively, there are
many reports on copper-catalyzed oxidative C-H bond
activation.12 For example, the Li group has reported a cross
dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) reaction in the presence
of copper and the corresponding oxidant.13 Herein, we
developed a novel and efficient copper-catalyzed oxidative
tandem cyclization from easily available benzylamines and
1,3-dicarbonyl derivatives, providing the polysubstituted
oxazole derivatives with moderate to good yields.
To initiate our study, the reaction of ethyl acetoacetate
with benzylamine was chosen as a model reaction in the
presence of a copper source and t-BuOOH (TBHP) solution
in n-hexane at room temperature.14 It was found that the
reaction led to the desired product ethyl 5-methyl-2-phenyl-
oxazole-4-carboxylate with a yield of 9% (Table 1, entry
1). Then we optimized the reaction conditions further to
increase the reaction yield. However, changing the reaction
temperature or modulating the reaction time had no positive
influence on this reaction. The addition of benzylamine in
two portions can increase the yield (Table 1, entry 2) and
avoid the oxidation of benzylamine. After a series of tries,
we introduced different additives to the reaction system to
improve the reaction efficiency. It was noted that the addition
of 1.2 equiv of NBS or iodine could enhance the reaction
yield up to 35% and 56% respectively (Table 1, entries 3
and 4). Following these results, the other oxidants, such as
t-BuOOt-Bu, TBHP, and air, were tested for this reaction in
the presence of molecular iodine. Among them, TBHP
solution in n-hexane gave the best result (Table 1, entries
entry
catalyst
oxidant
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
Air
additive solvent yield (%)b
1c CuI
-
-
CH3CN
CH3CN
9
15
35
56
17
34
29
32
53
61
57
0
2
3
4
5
6
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
NBS CH3CN
I2
I2
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
toluene
THF
t-BuOOt-Bu I2
7d CuI
8
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
-
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
CuCl
Cu(OAc)2·H2O TBHP
CuBr TBHP
Cu(OAc)2·H2O TBHP
Cu(OAc)2·H2O TBHP
Cu(OAc)2·H2O TBHP
Cu(OAc)2·H2O TBHP
Cu(OAc)2·H2O TBHP
39
43
93
0
EtOH
DMF
dioxane
17e Cu(OAc)2·H2O TBHP
DMF
73
a Reaction conditions: benzylamine (2 equiv, addition in two portions),
ethyl acetoacetate (1 equiv, 0.5 mmol), catalyst (0.05 mmol, 10 mmol %),
oxidant (2 equiv), additive (1.2 equiv), solvent (3 mL). The reaction was
performed for 6 h. b Determined by GC-MS with internal standard.
c Addition of benzylamine in one portion. d Aqueous TBHP (70%) was used
as oxidant. e The reaction was carried out at 60 °C.
4-6). Aqueous TBHP disfavored this reaction, nevertheless,
resulting in a poor yield of 29% (Table 1, entry 7).
Subsequently, different copper salts were examined in the
reaction. Without copper catalysts, the reaction was carried
out inefficiently, and the desired product was obtained with
a poor yield of 32% (Table 1, entry 8). Normally, all of these
copper salts can catalyze this reaction and improve the reaction
yields. Among these different copper salts, Cu(OAc)2·H2O was
the best catalyst for this reaction, and the corresponding yield
was enhanced up to 61% (Table 1, entries 9-11). Afterward,
various solvents were screened for this reaction. When the
reaction solvent was changed from acetonitrile to toluene or
dioxane, no product was observed. When THF or ethanol was
employed as the reaction solvent, the desired oxazole was
obtained in a lower yield of 43% and 39%, respectively (Table
1, entries 12-16). Finally, it was found that DMF was the most
suitable solvent for this reaction, with which the highest yield
of 93% was obtained (Table 1, entry 15). The reaction
temperature also had great influence on the reaction. Raising
the reaction temperature incurred a lower yield, while reducing
the reaction temperature led to a slower reaction rate (Table 1,
entry 17). In compromise, room temperature should be the
optimized reaction temperature.
(7) (a) Lister, J.; Robinson, R. J. Chem. Soc. 1912, 1297. (b) Keni, M.;
Tepe, J. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4211. (bb) Wipf, P.; Miller, C. P. J.
Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3604. (c) Kumar, M. P.; Liu, R.-S. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 4951. (d) Kison, C.; Opatz, T. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 843. (e)
Shi, B.; Blake, A. J.; Lewis, W.; Campbell, I. B.; Judkins, B. D.; Moody,
C. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 75, 152.
(8) (a) Derridj, F.; Djebbar, S.; Benali-Baitich, O.; Doucet, H. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 135. (b) Flegeau, E. F.; Popkin, M. E.;
Greaney, M. F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2495. (c) Lee, K.; Counceller, C. M.;
Stambuli, J. P. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1457.
(9) (a) Williams, D. R.; Lowder, D. P.; Gu, G.-Y.; Brooks, D. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 331. (b) Meyers, A. I.; Tavares, F. X. J. Org.
Chem. 1996, 61, 8207. (c) Uto, A. J. Y.; Wipf, P.; Reno, M. J.; Williams,
D. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1165.
(10) (a) Coqueron, P. Y.; Didier, C.; Ciufolini, M. A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1411. (b) Lechel, T.; Lentz, D.; Reissig, H. U. Chem.sEur.
J. 2009, 15, 5432.
(11) (a) Sherman, E. S.; Chemler, S. R.; Tan, T.-B.; Gerlits, O. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 1573. (b) Zabawa, T. P.; Kasi, D.; Chemler, S. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11250. (c) Adrio, L. A.; Hill, K. K. Chem. Commun.
2008, 2325. (d) Ohta, Y.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N.; Ohno, H. Chem. Commun.
2008, 835.
(12) (a) Borduas, N.; Powell, D. A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7822. (b)
Boldron, C.; Gamez, P.; Tooke, D. M.; Spek, A. L.; Reedijk, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3585. (c) Niu, M.-Y.; Yin, Z.-M.; Fu, H.; Jiang,
Y.-Y.; Zhao, Y.-F. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3961.
(13) (a) Li, Z.-P.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3672. (b) Li,
Z.-P.; Li, C.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6968. (c) Li, C.-J. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2009, 42, 335. (d) Basle´, O.; Li, C.-J. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 1047. (e)
Basle´, O.; Li, C.-J. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3661.
Finally, the optimal reaction condition was obtained, that
is, 2 equiv of benzylamine (1a) and 1 equiv of ethyl
acetoacetate (2a) as substrates, 0.01 equiv of copper acetate
as catalyst, 2 equiv of TBHP as oxidant, and 1.2 equiv of
(14) Hill, J. G.; Rossiter, B. E.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1983,
48, 3607.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010
2339