1770
K. Lee et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1767–1770
R
N
quency estimated for compound 1.14,16 The measured frequency of
O
O
resistance to targocil (38) in vitro is still higher than is typically
desirable, butmanyof theresistantmutantsarepathwaynulls. Since
these mutants are avirulent, they are not expected to contribute to
resistance in vivo, and the compound is thus highly promising.9,10
The acute toxicity of targocil (38) is acceptable. Doses of 75 mg/
kg administered via tail vein injection (see SI for details) caused no
adverse effects in mice after 24 h. Although the MIC of targocil (38)
shifts by a factor of eight in the presence of 50% fetal bovine serum,
its tolerated dose in mice is greater than 100-fold the serum MIC.
In conclusion, a structure–activity relationship study of the
WTA inhibitor 1 identified positions that are tolerant of substitu-
tion and led to the discovery of an analog (targocil, 38) that is
10-fold more potent than the original screening hit while also hav-
ing a 10-fold reduced mutational frequency. Targocil (38) is active
against methicillin-sensitive and resistant clinical strains, and
analysis of resistant mutants shows that it inhibits the same target
as 1 (TarG). Its properties suggest that it is a candidate for proof of
concept studies to address whether inhibiting WTA biosynthesis is
a promising strategy for treating bacterial infections in vivo.
N
O
S
O
N
N
N
HN
N
N
N
N
N
Ph
CO Me
2
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
>100 µM
N
N
N
N
N
HN
OMe
EtO
OEt
N
24
25
26
27
28
29
1.6 µM
3.1 µM
6.3 µM
>100 µM
>100 µM
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ph
Ac
Ph
Bn
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
>100 µM
>100 µM
Acknowledgments
Figure 3. SAR of the B-ring amine side chains. MICs are given as the lowest
concentration of compound (tested) that gave >90% growth inhibition in wildtype
This work was supported by the NIH (1P01AI083214 and
5R01GM078477 to S.W., F32AI084316 to J.C., and F3178727 to
J.G.S.) and support to K.L. and G.D.C. was provided by the National
Screening Laboratory for the Regional Centers of Excellence in Bio-
defense and Emerging Infectious Diseases (NIAID U54 AI057159).
We would like to thank Su Chiang and Gerald Beltz for helpful
discussions.
S. aureus RN4220. MICs are represented as >100
31% and 89% growth inhibition at the highest concentration tested (100
Compounds 33 and 36 showed greater than 70% growth inhibition in the
mutant at 100 M, whereas the remaining derivatives gave less than 30% growth
l
M if the derivative gave between
M).
tarO
l
D
l
inhibition (data not shown).
Table 3
MICs of the original inhibitor and two analogs against several S. aureus strains
Compds RN6390 MICa
M)
Newman MIC
M)
COL MIC
M)
MW2 MIC
(lM)
Supplementary data
(
l
(
l
(
l
1
15
38
6.3
3.1
0.3
12.5
3.1
0.3
6.3
3.1
0.6
6.3
3.1
0.6
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
a
MICs are given as the lowest concentration of compound (tested) that gave
References
>85% growth inhibition in each strain.
1. Boucher, H. W.; Corey, G. R. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, S344.
2. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2002, 51, 565.
3. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2002, 51, 902.
4. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2004, 53, 322.
5. Brickner, S. J.; Barbachyn, M. R.; Hutchinson, D. K.; Manninen, P. R. J. Med. Chem.
2008, 51, 1981.
6. Hentschke, M.; Saager, B.; Horstkotte, M. A.; Scherpe, S.; Wolters, M.; Kabisch,
H.; Grosse, R.; Heisig, P.; Aepfelbacher, M.; Rohde, H. Infection 2008, 36, 85.
7. Skiest, D. J. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 655.
8. Ratnaraja, N.; Hawkey, P. M. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2008, 6, 601.
9. Weidenmaier, C.; Kokai-Kun, J.; Kristian, S.; Chanturiya, T.; Kalbacher, H.;
Gross, M.; Nicholson, G.; Neumeister, B.; Mond, J.; Peschel, A. Nat. Med. 2004,
10, 243.
10. Weidenmaier, C.; Peschel, A. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 276.
11. Neuhaus, F.; Baddiley, J. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 686.
12. Swoboda, J. G.; Campbell, J.; Meredith, T. C.; Walker, S. ChemBioChem 2010,
11, 35.
methicillin-sensitive (RN6390 and Newman) and methicillin-resis-
tant (MW2 and COL) S. aureus strains, with 38 consistently show-
ing the most potent activity.
Compound 38, which we have named targocil, has a bacterio-
static mechanism of action like the original compound (1). Its
activity depends on flux into the WTA biosynthetic pathway since
the
DtarO mutant is not susceptible. Several lines of evidence
indicate that targocil (38) inhibits the same target in the WTA
biosynthetic pathway as 1. For example, targocil (38) shows
cross-resistance with mutants selected against 1. Some of these
characterized mutant strains contain point mutations in tarG;
others contain mutations in tarO that abolish the expression of
WTAs, making the TarG transporter nonessential. Furthermore,
resistant mutations selected against targocil (38) itself map to tarG
as well as tarO.
One surprising finding was that the measured mutational fre-
quency of S. aureus Newman for targocil (38) was found to be
7 Â 10À7 percelldivision, whichis at least10-foldlowerthanthefre-
13. D’Elia, M. A.; Pereira, M. P.; Chung, Y. S.; Zhao, W.; Chau, A.; Kenney, T. J.;
Sulavik, M. C.; Black, T. A.; Brown, E. D. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 4183.
14. Swoboda, J. G.; Meredith, T. C.; Campbell, J.; Brown, S.; Suzuki, T.; Bollenbach,
T.; Malhowski, A. J.; Kishony, R.; Gilmore, M. S.; Walker, S. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009,
4, 875.
15. Jones, P.; Chambers, M. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9973.
16. Haddix, P. L.; Paulsen, E. T.; Werner, T. F. Bioscene 2000, 26, 17.