oxasilacylce B (eq 1). However, oxidation of the C-Si bond
required harsh conditions and is limited to the particular
substitution pattern. Herein, we wish to report a mild, general,
and efficient method for the synthesis of unsymmetrical
biphenols 3 via intramolecular Pd-catalyzed C-H aryla-
tion7,10 of 1 to form 2, followed by a routine desilylation
step (eq 2).
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
additive
(equiv)
no.
R
base (equiv)
yield, %b 2:4c
1
2
3
4
5
6
H (1a)
1a
1a
1a
1a
K2CO3d (2)
K3PO4 (2)
Ag2CO3 (2)
K3PO4 (2)
K3PO4 (2)
K3PO4 (2)
Ag2CO3 (0.5)
K3PO4 (2)
Ag2CO3 (1.5)
K3PO4 (1)
Ag2CO3 (1)
K3PO4 (2)
Ag2CO3 (1)
none
none
none
PivOH (0.3)
25
31
49
42
5:1
14:1
15:1
15:1
17:1
26:1
3-NO2-Py (0.3) 43
1a
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
66
7
8
9
1a
1a
1a
73
41:1
32:1
78
We hypothesized that if intramolecular C-H arylation10f-k
of easily available bis-aryloxy silane 1 would be efficient to
form seven-membered11 silacycles 2, it would provide an
easy route to biphenols 3 via a simple deprotection. To test
this hypothesis, we subjected 1a to the previously reported
arylation conditions.7 However, under these conditions only
reductive debromination occurred, with trace amounts of 2a
produced. Fagnou showed the possibility of seven-membered
ring formation employing bulky electron-deficient bidentate
ligands combined with palladium acetate.10i,j Still, employ-
ment of these conditions did not give any arylation product
in the silicon-tethered case, as only reductive product 4 was
obtained. After extensive screening of reaction parameters,
including palladium sources, ligands, bases, and solvents,12
we found that bulky electron-deficient monodentate ligand
P(C6F5)3 in nonpolar solvents is capable of suppressing the
C-Br reduction process. Employment of bases K3PO4 and
Ag2CO3 resulted in higher efficiency of arylation (Table 1,
entries 2, 3). Application of additives did not cause improve-
ment (entries 4, 5). Gratifyingly, the combination of K3PO4
85 (73)
(70)
(90)
(80)
34:1
10 p-OMe (1b) K3PO4 (2)
Ag2CO3 (1)
11 p-CF3 (1c) K3PO4 (2)
Ag2CO3 (1)
>99:1
>99:1
100:0
12 o-Me (1d)
K3PO4(2)
Ag2CO3 (1)
a See Supporting Information for details. b GC yields of 2, isolated yields
are in parentheses. c GC ratio. d p-Xylene was used as a solvent.
and Ag2CO3 dramatically improved the yield and the
arylation/reduction ratio, resulting in 73% isolated yield of
2a and high arylation/reduction ratio (entry 9). Next, these
conditions were tested on substrates 1b-d (entries 10-12).
In all cases, the yields were high with negligible amounts
of debromination byproducts 4 obtained. Naturally, the
standard TBAF deprotection protocol afforded 3a quanti-
tively.12 Semi-one-pot procedure from 1a to 3a demonstrated
the same efficiency (Table 2, entry 1). For easier separation,
all other biphenols were isolated as acetates without loss of
the yields.
Next, the scope of this protocol toward synthesis of
unsymmetrical biphenols, phenol-naphthols, and binaphthols
was examined (Table 2). Gratifyingly, it was found that this
method is general and efficient, regardless on the electronic
properties of substituents on either phenol ring. Thus, a
variety of functional groups, such as MeO, F, Cl, CF3, CHO,
NO2, and even Br, can be perfectly tolerated under these
reaction conditions producing the unsymmetrical biphenol
acetates in 3-step semi-one-pot in high to excellent overall
yields. As expected, meta-substituted phenols gave mixtures
of regioisomers. The regioselectivity was affected by both
electronics and sterics. For example, although CF3 and Me
groups are comparable in size, the substrate 1k, possessing
an electron-withdrawing group (R ) CF3), reacted more
regioselectively compared to Me-substituted 1j. Expectedly,
the steric effect on the regioselectivity of arylation has also
been observed. Thus, differently O-protected resorcinol
(8) (a) Bedford, R. B.; Coles, S. J.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Limmert, M. E.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 112. (b) Oi, S.; Watanabe, S.-i.; Fukita,
S.; Inoue, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8665. (c) Hennings, D. D.; Iwasa,
S.; Rawal, V. H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2. (d) Bajracharya, G. B.; Daugulis,
O. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4625. (e) Xiao, B.; Fu, Y.; Xu, J.; Gong, T.-J.; Dai,
J.-J.; Yi, J.; Liu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 468.
(9) (a) Stork, G.; Suh, H. S.; Kim, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
7054. For a review, see, for example: (b) Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M.;
Sieburth, S. M. Synthesis 1997, 813.
(10) For reviews, see: (a) Alberico, D.; Scott, M. E.; Lautens, M. Chem.
ReV. 2007, 107, 174. (b) Seregin, I. V.; Gevorgyan, V. Chem. Soc. ReV.
2007, 36, 1173. (c) Campeau, L.-C.; Stuart, D. R.; Fagnou, K. Aldrichimica
Acta 2007, 40, 35. (d) Ashenhurst, J. A. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2010, 39, 540.
See also: (e) Nishikata, T.; Abela, A. R.; Huang, S.; Lipshutz, B. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4978. For intramolecular arylations, see examples:
(f) Garc´ıa-Cuadrado, D.; de Mendoza, P.; Braga, A. A. C.; Maseras, F.;
Echavarren, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6880. (g) Garc´ıa-Cuadrado,
D.; Braga, A. A. C.; Maseras, F.; Echavarren, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 1066. (h) Pascual, S.; de Mendoza, P.; Braga, A. A. C.; Maseras,
F.; Echavarren, A. M. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 6021. (i) Campeau, L.-C.;
Parisien, M.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9186. (j) Leblanc,
M.; Fagnou, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2849. (k) Shimizu, M.; Mochida, K.;
Hiyama, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9760.
(11) For challenges in formation of a seven-membered ring via C-H
arylation, see refs 10i, j.
(12) See the Supporting Information for details.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010
2443