strong electrophilic halogen sources8 such as chlorine9 or
bromine,10 NBS,11 PCl5,12 or PBr5.13 Sporadic iodinations
of metalated nitriles14 demonstrate the viability of developing
a general electrophilic halogen source, although trapping with
molecular iodine lacks generality.15 In addition, iodonitriles
are thermally labile16 and have a limited reagent tolerance.
The current challenge in synthesizing halonitriles lies in
developing an efficient and reproducable halogenating agent
with functional group tolerance.
Table 1. Metalated Nitrile Chlorinations
Exploratory alkylations of metalated nitriles with 2-chloro-
2-fluoro-2-phenylacetonitrile (6)17 serendipitously revealed
this reagent to be an excellent chlorinating agent (Table 1).18
Optimizations with cyclohexanecarbonitrile (7a) revealed the
need to rapidly add a slight excess of 6 to the lithiated nitrile
to prevent dimerization (Table 1, entry 1).19 This simple
expedient minimizes the attack of the lithiated nitrile, derived
from 7, on the electrophilic chloronitrile 8, efficiently pro-
viding the chloronitrile in less than 5 min at -78 °C.
LDA-induced deprotonation and rapid addition of 6
efficiently halogenates a range of alkylnitriles (Table 1).
Cyclic and acyclic alkylnitriles (Table 1, entries 1-5) are
readily chlorinated as are several significantly more acidic20
arylacetonitriles (Table 1, entries 6-9). The chlorination
method is ideal for nitriles bearing functionality that would
otherwise react with radical-based halogenating agents: ni-
triles 7b, 7c, 7e, and 7i,21 containing alkene, alcohol, acetal,
and pyridine functionalities, respectively. The only limitation
lies in the substitution of the alkylnitriles which must be
tertiary.22
Encouraged by the effective chlorination of nitriles, the
analogous chlorination of enolates was explored. The at-
traction lies in expanding the limited number of electrophilic
halogenating agents available for intercepting ester enolates.23
Using the same deprotonation-chlorination protocol with a
(8) Halonitriles are also generated by halogenating cyanohydrins: (a)
Matveeva, E. D.; Podrugina, T. A.; Tishkovskaya, E. V.; Zefirov, N. S.
MendeleeV Commun. 2003, 260–262. (b) Gassman, P. G.; Guggenheim,
T. L. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3023.
(9) (a) Carpenter, W. R.; Armstrong, P. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 2772.
(b) Rosenblatt, D. H.; Broome, G. H. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 2116.
(10) Stevens, C. L.; Lenk, C. T. J. Org. Chem. 1954, 19, 538. (b)
Ginsburg, D.; Baizer, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 2254.
(11) Couvreur, P.; Bruylants, A. J. Org. Chem. 1953, 18, 501.
(12) Freeman, P. K.; Balls, D. M.; Brown, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 1968,
33, 2211.
(13) Stevens, C. L.; Coffield, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 103.
(14) (a) Della, E. W.; Knill, A. M.; Pigou, P. E. J. Org. Chem. 1993,
58, 2110. (b) Cambie, R. C.; Erson, A. D.; Gourdie, A. C.; Rutledge, P. S.;
Woodgate, P. D. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 348, 317.
(15) Sequential silylketenimine formation and iodination is currently the
most general route to iodonitriles but is limited to arylacetonitriles: Watt,
D. S. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 2799.
a 14.3:1 ratio of diastereomers at the nitrile-bearing carbon. b 9:1 ratio
of diastereomers at the nitrile-bearing carbon.
series of ester enolates and 2-chloro-2-fluoro-2-phenylac-
etonitrile (6) readily provides the corresponding chloroesters
(Table 2, entries 1-7). Aliphatic, acyclic, and cyclic esters
are efficiently chlorinated as is the benzylic ester 9g (Table
2, entry 7). Alkenes are tolerated within the acyl skeleton
(Table 2, entries 1 and 4) and in the alkyl chain (Table 2,
entry 2). Analogous chlorinations of ketone and lactone
enolates smoothly afford the corresponding chloroketone and
(16) Mori, M.; Kubo, Y.; Ban, Y. Heterocycles 1990, 31, 433.
(17) Commercially available from SynQuest Fluorochemicals.
(18) In an extensive screening of halogenating agents no electrophilic
halogen source was as effective as 2-chloro-2-fluoro-2-phenylacetonitrile
(6).
(19) Li, X.; Jain, N.; Russell, R. K.; Ma, R.; Branum, S.; Xu, J.; Sui, Z.
Org. Process Res. DeV. 2006, 10, 354.
(20) Bordwell, F. G.; Branca, J. C.; Bares, J. E.; Filler, R. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 780.
(21) Deutsch, H. M.; Shi, Q.; Gruszecka-Kowalik, E.; Schweri, M. M.
J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1201.
(22) The conversion with secondary nitriles is low and considerable
dimerization is observed. A similar limitation exists for the iodination of
aldehyde enolates: Groenewegen, P.; Kallenberg, H.; van der Gen, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 2817.
(23) (a) Arnold, R. T.; Kulenovic, S. T. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3687.
(b) Stotter, P. L.; Hill, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 2576. (c) Rathke,
M. W.; Lindert, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 3995.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 12, 2010
2811