2862
X. Huang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 2859–2863
7. Jilino, M.; Stevens, F. G. J. Chem. Soc, Perkin Trans. 1998, 1, 1677.
8. Kadaba, P. K.; Stevenson, P. J.; P-Nnane, I.; Damani, L. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
1996, 4, 165.
9. Passannanti, A.; Diana, P.; Barraja, P.; Mingoia, F.; Lauria, A.; Cirrincione, G.
Heterocycles 1998, 48, 1229.
10. Velarquez, S.; Alvarez, R.; Perez, C.; Gago, F.; De, C.; Balzarini, J.; Camarasa, M. J.
Antiviral Chem. Chemother. 1998, 9, 481.
11. Cunha, A. C.; Figueiredo, J. M.; Tributino, J. L. M.; Miranda, A. L. P.; Castro, H. C.;
Zingali, R. B.; Fraga, C. A. M.; de Souza, M. C. B. V.; Ferreirac, V. F.; Barreiroa, E. J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 2051.
the bacteria strains, which exhibited 4–8-folds superior antibacte-
rial activity than ciprofloxacin.28
Two chiral quinolones 34.18 and 34.19 have equal activities
against all bacteria, and displayed moderate activities against S.
aureus (2 lg/mL), S. epidermidis (2 lg/mL) and E. coli (1 lg/mL).
The oxime and alkyloxime substituted quinolones 34.21, 34.27,
34.28, 34.29, 34.30 and 34.31 all showed good activities against
Gram-positive pathogens, such as S. aureus and S. epidermidis.
Among them, quinolone 34.27 exhibited superior potency against
12. Biagi, G.; Calderone, V.; Giorgi, I.; Livi, O.; Martinotti, E.; Martelli, A.; Nardi, A.
Farmaco 2004, 59, 397.
S. aureus (0.25
quinolones, which was comparable to that of ciprofloxacin (0.125
and 0.5 g/mL, respectively). Quinolones 34.28, 34.29, 34.30 and
34.31 exhibited good activity against multidrug-resistant S. aureus.
Benzyloxyimino substituted quinolone 34.31 exhibited good anti-
lg/mL) and S. epidermidis (0.5 lg/mL) than the other
13. Gill, C.; Jadhav, G.; Shaikh, M.; Kale, R.; Ghawalkar, A.; Nagargoje, D.; Shiradkar,
M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 6244.
14. Hou, D. R.; Alam, S.; Kuan, T. C.; Ramanathan, M.; Lin, T. P.; Hung, M. S. Bioorg.
l
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1022.
15. Weis, R.; Schweiger, K.; Faist, J.; Rajkovic, E.; Kungl, A. J.; Walter, M. F.;
Schunack, F. W.; Seebacher, W. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 10326.
16. Aridoss, G.; Amirthaganesan, S.; Ashok Kumar, N.; Kim, J. T.; Lim, K. T.; Kabilan,
S.; Jeong, Y. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 6542.
17. Sheng, R.; Xu, Y.; Hu, C.; Zhang, J.; Lin, X.; Li, J.; Yang, B.; He, Q.; Hu, Y. Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 7.
18. Huang, X.; Chen, D.; Wu, N.; Zhang, A.; Jia, Z.; Li, X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2009, 19, 4130.
19. Suto, M. J.; Domagala, J. M.; Roland, G. E.; Mailloux, G. B.; Cohen, M. A. J. Med.
Chem. 1992, 35, 4745.
bacterial activities against multidrug-resistant S. aureus (4
than any other alkyloxime substituted quinolone and ciprofloxacin
(MIC >32 g/mL). In contrast, the oxime and alkyloxime substi-
lg/mL)
l
tuted quinolones 34.21, 34.27, 34.28, 34.29, 34.30, 34.31 all dis-
played moderate potency against E. coli and P. aeruginosa.
In conclusion, we have synthesized a series of new quinolones
based on 4-substituted 4-(1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)piperidine as the
C7 building blocks of quinolone core 32.29 The in vitro antibacterial
activity assay demonstrated that the quinolones exhibited good
antibacterial activities to most organisms. The phenyl substitute
quinolone 34.5 displayed superior antibacterial activities against
multidrug-resistant S. aureus, S. epidermidis and E. faecalis, whereas
it exhibited mild potency to Gram-negative strains. Quinolone 34.6
displayed excellent antibacterial activities against S. aureus, S. epi-
dermidis and E. coli, which is comparable to the reference drug. The
formyl substitute quinolone 34.15 displayed good and balanced
activities against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organ-
isms, especially against S. epidermidis. The oxime and alkyloxime
substituted quinolones exhibited good antibacterial activities
against the Gram-positive strains. In particular the methoxyimino
substituted quinolone 34.27 displayed the highest inhibitory activ-
ities against S. aureus and S. epidermidis. In the light of the increas-
ing need for treatments against infections caused by Gram-positive
pathogens, this series of quinolones may be a potential scaffold for
the exploration of new quinolone antibacterials. Further work on
the antibacterial activity of these compounds using an expanded
panel of organisms and in vivo efficacy models are in progress.
20. Brighty, K. E.; Gootz, T. D. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1997, 39, 1.
21. Fuwa, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Konno, Y.; Watanabe, N.; Miyashita, H.; Sasaki, M.;
Natsugari, H.; Kan, T.; Fukuyama, T.; Tomita, T.; Iwatsubo, T. ACS Chem. Biol.
2007, 2, 408.
22. Sangshetti, J. N.; Nagawade, R. R.; Shinde, D. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009,19, 3564.
23. Datta, A.; Veeresa, G. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7609.
24. Dang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Ji, R.; Zhang, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4523.
25. General synthetic procedure for selected compounds: Reactions were conducted
using oven-dried glassware under an atmosphere of nitrogen. NMR spectra
were recorded on Bruker 400 (400 MHz) spectrometer. Chemical shifts are
reported in ppm related to tetramethylsilane as the internal standard. The mass
spectra were recorded on Agilent 6120 quadrupole LC/MS system under electron
spray impact (ESI) ionization condition or otherwise specified. The preparation
of tert-butyl 4-(4-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)piperidine-1-carboxylate (com-
pound 3): A dried flask containing tert-butyl 4-azidopiperidine-1-carboxylate
(0.600 g, 2.65 mmol) and ethynylbenzene (0.271 g, 2.65 mmol) in 5 mL of
methanol, N-ethyl-N-isopropylpropan-2-amine (1.712 g, 13.30 mmol) and CuI
(1.151 g, 0.80 mmol) were added at room temperature. The mixture was stirred
at the same temperature for 32 h, and then filtered. The filtrate was concentrated
under reduced pressure and the residue were added ethyl acetate (30 mL) and
HCl solution (0.1 M, 30 mL). The organic phase was separated and the aqueous
solution was extracted with ethyl acetate. The combined organic phase was
washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution (60 mL), brine (60 mL), dried over
MgSO4. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford the crude
product which was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl
acetate = 4:1) to give compound
preparation of tert-butyl 4-(4-(methoxycarbonyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)piperi-
dine-1-carboxylate (compound 10): dried flask containing tert-butyl 4-
3 (0.801 g, 2.44 mmol), yield 92%. The
A
azidopiperidine-1-carboxylate (1.929 g, 8.52 mmol), CuI (1.624 g, 8.52 mmol)
and methyl propiolate (1.074 g, 12.79 mmol) in 16 mL of acetonitrile. The
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h and then concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue was added ethyl acetate (80 mL) and water
(80 mL). The mixture was separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with
ethyl acetate (80 mL). The combined organic phase was washed with brine
(150 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced
pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography (Petroleum
ether/ethyl acetate = 6:1) to give compound 10 (2.033 g, 6.55 mmol), yield 77%.
The preparation of tert-butyl 4-(4-(1-hydroxyethyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)piperi-
dine-1-carboxylate (compound 16): A dried flask containing magnesium powder
(0.312 g, 12.84 mmol), 10 mL of THF was added under an atmosphere of nitrogen
at the room temperature. Methyl iodine was added to the suspension of
magnesium at a suitable rate. When the reaction started, the solution of methyl
iodine was added dropwise at a rate which is sufficient to maintain a gentle
reflux. After the reaction was completed, the gray solution was stirred for
another 4 h at room temperature and then cooled by an ice/water bath. A
solution of tert-butyl 4-(4-formyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)piperidine-1-carbox-
ylate (0.600 g, 2.14 mmol) in 5 mL of THF was added to the Grignard reagent
above, and the mixture was warmed to room temperature. After the reaction
mixture was stirred overnight, saturated NH4Cl solution (50 mL) was added in
ice/water bath. Ethyl acetate (50 mL) was added, separated and the aqueous
phase was extracted with ethyl acetate (50 mL). The combined organic phase
was washed with brine (100 mL) and dried over MgSO4. Concentrated under
reduced pressure to give the crude produc which was purified by column
chromatography (Petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 2:3) to get compound 16
(0.508 g, 1.71 mmol), yield 80%. The preparation of tert-butyl 4-(4-((meth-
oxyimino)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)piperidine-1-carboxylate (compound 22):
A mixture of tert-butyl 4-(4-((hydroxyimino)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)-
piperidine-1-carboxylate (0.591 g, 2.00 mmol), methyl iodine (1.278 g, 9.00
mmol), 4 M sodium hydroxide solution (0.75 mL) and tetrabutylammonium
iodide (0.222 g, 0.60 mmol) in THF (8 mL) was stirred at room temperature for
Acknowledgments
We thank the Science and Technology Foundation of Guangz-
hou (07A8206031) and the National Science Foundation of China
(20472116) for financial support.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Mitscher, L. A. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 559.
2. (a) Emami, S.; Shafiee, A.; Foroumadi, A. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 109; (b)
Paterson, D. L. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006, 6, 486; (c) Bradbury, B. J.; Pucci, M. J.
Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2008, 8, 1.
3. Ball, P.; Mandell, L.; Niki, Y.; Tillotson, G. Drug Safety 1999, 21, 407.
4. Murphy, S. T.; Case, H. L.; Ellsworth, E.; Hagen, S.; Huband, M.; Joannides, T.;
Limberakis, C.; Marotti, K. R.; Ottolini, A. M.; Rauckhorst, M.; Starr, J.; Stier, M.;
Taylor, C.; Zhu, T.; Blaser, A.; Denny, W. A.; Lu, G.; Smaill, J. B.; Rivault, F. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 2150.
5. Kolb, H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 1128.
6. Genin, M. J.; Allwine, D. A.; Anderson, D. J.; Barbachyn, M. R.; Emmert, D. E.;
Garmon, S. A.; Graber, D. R.; Grega, K. C.; Hester, J. B.; Hutchinson, D. K.; Morris,
J.; Reischer, R. J.; Ford, C. W.; Zurenko, G. E.; Hamel, J. C.; Schaadt, R. D.; Stapert,
D.; Yagi, B. H. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 953.