temperature to a value of about 150 nC cmꢁ2. Below the phase
transition at 111 1C the polarization peak splits into two sharp
peaks (Fig. 4b) and the polarization value increases to ca.
350 nC cmꢁ2, confirming a transition to a SmAPA phase. The
Ps(T) curve (Fig. 4c) shows soft-mode like behaviour on
approaching the SmAPR–SmAPA transition. In the SmAPA
and SmAPR phases no textural changes take place during
switching, i.e. the position of the dark extinction brushes,
located parallel to the crossed polarizers, does not move
(Fig. 4d and e), indicating a switching by collective rotation
around the molecular long axis.
were obtained in a new class of easily accessable bent-core
mesogens.
This work was supported by the EU within the FP7 funded
Collaborative Project BIND (Grant No 216025); C. K. is
grateful to Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for a Feodor
Lynen-fellowship.
Notes and references
z Compounds related to 1, but with alkoxy chains instead of alkyl
chains show SmA and SmAPA phases, but no SmAPR phase;7a reversal
of the outer ester groups leads to N and (tilted) SmC phases with much
lower transition temperatures.12 The effect of the direction of the
ester linking groups has several origins. An alternation of electron
rich and electron deficit aromatics (electrostatic surface potential)
favours intermolecular interactions, hence stabilizing smectic phases
(in 1 alternation of electron deficit terephthalate and electron rich
phenylether units).13 Moreover, the different rotational barriers of
the Ar–COO and Ar–OOC bonds gives rise to distinct molecular
flexibilities. Also torsional angles, bending angles, dipole moments and
quadrupole moments are affected by reversal of the COO groups and
influence the mesophase stability.14 The prediction of tilt is even more
difficult and presently based on empiric observations.
Whereas the uniaxial-to-biaxial phase transition enthalpy of
1b is very small (0.5 kJ molꢁ1), the SmA-to-SmAPR transition
enthalpy value is much higher (2.8 kJ molꢁ1) and it is relatively
broad compared to the sharp Iso–SmA transition (4.6 kJ molꢁ1).
This indicates that the major structural change takes place at
the SmA–SmAPR transition, whereas polar order develops
nearly continuously. Furthermore, the current peaks are
close to the 0 V line of the applied voltage (Fig. 4b), which
is untypical for antiferroelectric switching. For this type of
polarization current curves a superparaelectric type of switching
was discussed previously.11
1 R. Amaranatha Reddy and C. Tschierske, J. Mater. Chem., 2006,
16, 907; H. Takezoe and Y. Takanishi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 2006,
45, 597.
2 L. E. Hough, M. Spannuth, M. Nakata, D. A. Coleman,
C. D. Jones, G. Dantlgraber, C. Tschierske, J. Watanabe,
E. Korblova, D. M. Walba, J. E. Maclennan, M. A. Glaser and
¨
There are two distinct models for the SmA–SmAPR–SmAPA
transition. (i) In the first model uniform polarity develops at
the transition SmA-to-SmAPR within the layers but without
correlation of the polar direction in adjacent layers (Fig. 5b).
These polar layers register in an antiparallel correlation at the
transition to the SmAPA phase (Fig. 5a).8a (ii) In an alternative
model8b the molecules, which are rotationally disordered
around the long axis in the SmA phase, become organized in
polar clusters with a preferred polar direction at the transition
to SmAPR (Fig. 5c, note that there is randomization of polar
direction in the layers, but correlation between the layers). In
the SmAPR phase these clusters are rotational disordered
around the director n and their size increases with decreasing
temperature. These ferroelectric clusters can be aligned under
a sufficiently strong electric field, leading to a field induced
switching. At a certain size these clusters align spontaneously,
giving rise to macroscopic phase biaxiality and polar order
(SmAPR–SmAPA transition). Further detailed investigations
are in progress to clarify the modes of supramolecular organi-
zation in the SmAPR and SmAPA phases.
N. A. Clark, Science, 2009, 325, 452.
3 (a) T. Niori, T. Sekine, J. Watanabe, T. Furukawa and
H. Takezoe, J. Mater. Chem., 1996, 6, 1231; (b) D. R. Link,
G. Natale, R. Shao, J. E. Maclennan, N. A. Clark, E. Korblova
and D. M. Walba, Science, 1997, 278, 1924.
4 J. Etxebarria and M. B. Ros, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 2919.
5 H. R. Brand, P. E. Cladis and H. Pleiner, Macromolecules, 1992,
25, 7223.
6 A. Eremin, S. Diele, G. Pelzl, H. Nadasi, W. Weissflog,
J. Salfetnikova and H. Kresse, Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear,
Soft Matter Phys., 2001, 64, 051707.
7 (a) L. Kovalenko, M. W. Schroder, R. A. Reddy, S. Diele, G. Pelzl
¨
and W. Weissflog, Liq. Cryst., 2005, 32(7), 857–865;
(b) R. Amaranatha Reddy and B. K. Sadashiva, J. Mater. Chem.,
2004, 14, 310; B. Glettner, S. Hein, R. Amaranatha Reddy,
U. Baumeister and C. Tschierske, Chem. Commun., 2007, 2596.
8 (a) D. Pociecha, M. Cepic, E. Gorecka and J. Mieczkowski, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 2003, 91, 185501; (b) Y. Shimbo, E. Gorecka,
D. Pociecha, F. Araoka, M. Goto, Y. Tankanishi, K. Ishikawa,
J. Mieczkowski, K. Gomola and H. Takezoe, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
2006, 97, 113901; (c) K. Gomola, L. Guo, E. Gorecka,
D. Pociecha, J. Mieczkowski, K. Ishikawa and H. Takezoe, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 6592.
In summary, the unique phase sequence SmA–SmAPR–SmAPA
was observed for the first time and broad SmAPR regions
9 (a) G. Pelzl, H. N. Shreenivasa Murthy, M. W. Schroder, S. Diele,
¨
Z. Vakhovskaya, H. Kresse and W. Weissflog, J. Mater. Chem.,
2006, 16, 1702; (b) R. A. Reddy, U. Baumeister and C. Tschierske,
Chem. Commun., 2009, 4236.
10 G. S. Lee, Y.-J. Lee, S. Y. Choi, Y. S. Park and K. B. Yoon, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 12151.
11 M. F. Achard, J. Ph. Bedel, J. P. Marcerou, H. T. Nguyen and
J. C. Rouillon, Eur. Phys. J. E, 2003, 10, 129.
12 C. Keith, A. Lehmann, U. Baumeister, M. Prehm and
C. Tschierske, Soft Matter, 2010, DOI: 10.1039/b923262a.
13 (a) P. Bedel, J. C. Rouillon, J. P. Marcerou, M. Laguerre,
H. T. Nguyen and M. F. Achard, Liq. Cryst., 2001, 28, 1285;
(b) E. Terazzi, L. Guenee, P.-Y. Morgantini, G. Bernardinelli,
B. Donnio, D. Guillon and C. Piguet, Chem.–Eur. J., 2007, 13,
1674.
14 S. A. Rama Krishnan, W. Weissflog, G. Pelzl, S. Diele, H. Kresse,
Z. Vakhovskaya and R. Friedemann, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
2006, 8, 1170.
Fig. 5 Models of molecular arrangements (green arrows = polar
direction, skewed arrows point out of or into the projection plane):
(a) SmAPA; (b,c) SmAPR; (b) randomization of polar direction
between the layers, (c) randomization of polar direction within the
layers (ferroelectric clusters).
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
3704 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3702–3704