others been employed for the synthesis of non-natural amino
acids.20,21
We have developed the asymmetric Cu-catalyzed allylic
substitution of allylic bromides with Grignard reagents,
employing chiral ferrocene-based bisphosphine ligands
(Scheme 1).22-26 This catalytic process is especially suited
The N-substituted allylic bromides 1 and 5 (Tables 1 and
3) of various chain lengths are available in a few steps from
commercially available compounds.31
Table 1. Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation of Allylic Bromides 1
Scheme 1
.
Cu-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylation of Cinnamyl
Bromide
entry
n
branched (2)/linear (3) yield (%) (for 2) ee (%)
1
2
3
1 (1a)
2 (1b)
3a (1c)
95:5
98:2
92:8
74 (2a)
84 (2b)
72 (2c)
99
90
98
a 6.00 mol % of CuBr·SMe2 and 8.00 mol % of L1 were used.
for the introduction of chiral methyl substituents, a structural
motif frequently observed in naturally occurring com-
pounds.27 One major advantage of this methodology is that
it furnishes terminal olefinic bonds, which represent ideal
starting points for further modifications. This concept has been
successfully applied in the synthesis of chiral allylic esters,
which are important building blocks for the preparation of chiral
lactones.28 Similar approaches have been reported for the
synthesis of chiral carbocycles by combination of allylic
substitution followed by ring-closing metathesis.29,30
We anticipated that the Cu-catalyzed asymmetric allylic
alkylation would serve as an ideal basis for the synthesis of
nitrogen-containing heterocycles of various ring sizes, when
combined with olefin or ene-yne ring-closing metathesis.
When starting off from allylic bromides substituted with
protected amine and terminal olefin or alkyne substituents,
the obtained chiral products could subsequently be trans-
formed to the correspoding unsaturated piperidines, azepanes
or azocanes. One important feature of this approach is the
fact that the resulting compounds bearing olefins or dienes
are well-suited chiral building blocks for further modifica-
tions.
When allyl bromides 1 with terminal olefin substituents
were subjected to allylic alkylation conditions (3.0 mol %
of CuBr·SMe2, 4.0 mol % of L1 (Taniaphos32-34 ), 1.2 equiv
of MeMgBr in CH2Cl2 at -80 °C), the desired chiral products
2 were obtained in good yields and up to excellent enanti-
oselectivities (reaching 99% ee, Table 1, entry 1). Further-
more, the product distribution of branched (2) to linear (3)
was very good, exceeding 92:8 favoring the branched
products. To reach full conversion of 1c (n ) 3) (Table 1,
entry 3), a higher catalyst loading of 6.0 mol % of CuBr·SMe2
and 8.0 mol % of L1 was required.
Chiral compounds 2 were subsequently transformed to the
corresponding N-heterocycles 4 by ring-closing metathesis
(Table 2). With 5.0 mol % of Hoveyda-Grubbs second-
Table 2. Ring-Closing Metathesis of Olefinic Substrates 2
(18) Felpin, F. X.; Lebreton, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 3693–3712
(19) Pandit, U. K.; Overkleeft, H. S.; Borer, B. C.; Bieraugel, H. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 1999, 959–968.
.
entry
n
yield (%)
ee (%)
1
2
3
1 (2a)
2 (2b)
3 (2c)
54 (4a)36
61 (4b)
77 (4c)
99
90
98
(20) Hassan, H. M. A.; Brown, F. K. Chem. Commun. , 46, 3013–3015
(21) Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; Schoemaker, H. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
.
677–680
.
(22) Harutyunyan, S. R.; den Hartog, T.; Geurts, K.; Minnaard, A. J.;
Feringa, B. L. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 2824–2852
(23) Lo´pez, F.; van Zijl, A. W.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. Chem.
Commun. 2006, 409–411
(24) van Zijl, A. W.; Lo´pez, F.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 2558–2563
(25) van Zijl, A. W.; Szymanski, W.; Lo´pez, F.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa,
B. L. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6994–7002
(26) Alexakis, A.; Ba¨ckvall, J. E.; Krause, N.; Pa`mies, O.; Die´guez, M.
.
generation catalyst,35 the six- to eight-membered rings were
obtained in moderate to good yields. The best result was
found for the eight-membered unsaturated azocane 4c (77%,
.
.
.
Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 2796–2823
.
(31) For the synthetic routes, see the Supporting Information.
(32) Ireland, T.; Grossheimann, G.; Wieser-Jeunesse, C.; Knochel, P.
(27) ter Horst, B.; Feringa, B. L.; Minnaard, A. J. Chem. Commun. 2010,
46, 2535–2547.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3212–3215
(33) Fukuzawa, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Hosaka, M.; Kikuchi, S. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 5540–5545
(34) Ireland, T.; Grossheimann, G.; Wieser-Jeunesse, C.; Knochel, P.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3666
(35) Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3760–3765.
.
(28) Geurts, K.; Fletcher, S. P.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 15572–15573.
.
(29) Alexakis, A.; Croset, K. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4147–4149
.
(30) Giacomina, F.; Riat, D.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1156–
.
1159
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 20, 2010
4659