Figure 2
in the study.
. Bifunctional tertiary amine-thiourea catalysts employed
Figure 1. Preparation of of 2-aryl-2,3-dihydro-4-quinolones via an
intramolecular cyclization reaction.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2-Phenyl-2,3-dihydro-4-quinolone 6a
via Conjugate Addition-Decarboxylation Sequence
thiourea catalysts,6 the acidic proton of the sulfonamide can
be readily removed, initiating the subsequent intramolecular
cyclization reaction. To better activate the electrophiles, an
ester group could be installed at the R-position of the
carbonyl function.7 Such an ester group is expected to
facilitate hydrogen bonding interactions between the sub-
strates and the thiourea catalysts, leading to a better stere-
ochemical control. With the established protocols for its
decarboxylative cleavage,7 the ester group can be readily
removed at the end of the synthesis, without affecting the
integrity of the newly created stereogenic center at the
2-position of chiral quinolones.
To prove the validity of our proposed synthetic strategy,
alkylidene ꢀ-ketoester 4a with a properly installed neighbor-
ing sulfonamide group was treated with catalyst 1 (Figure
2). To our delight, the intramolecular cyclization occurred
smoothly to yield product 5a in quantitative yield and with
87% ee. The next step is the cleavage of the ester group.
Upon further treatment with TsOH at the elevated temper-
ature, the decarboxylation8 took place readily, and 2-phenyl-
2,3-dihydro-4-quinolone 6a was obtained in excellent yield
and with 87% ee (Scheme 1).9
The enantiomeric purity of the final quinolone products
is determined by the stereochemical outcome of the first
intramolecular cyclization step, as the second decarboxylation
step will not compromise the stereogenic integrity of the
quinolone intermediates created. We therefore investigated
the catalytic effects of various bifunctional catalysts (Figure
2) and explored different reaction conditions for the intramo-
lecular conjugate addition step, aiming to improve the
enantioselectivity of the process. L-Threonine-derived 2, and
L-tryptophan-based bifunctional catalysts 3a10 and 3b all
could promote the reactions; however, the desired products
were obtained with disappointing enantioselectivity (Table
1, entries 2-4). A solvent screening revealed that toluene
was the best reaction medium. By lowering the reaction
temperature to 0 °C, the desired quinolone 6a could be
obtained in high yield and with 94% ee (entry 12). The
sulfonyl group on the nitrogen was crucial, employment of
alkylidene ꢀ-ketoester with the free amino group resulted in
formation of the product with only 78% ee, comparing to a
94% ee under otherwise same reaction conditions.
The reaction scope was next studied, various alkylidene
ꢀ-ketoesters with different substituents were examined, and
the results are summarized in Table 2. It was found that para-
or meta- substituted aromatic rings, regardless their electronic
nature, were well-tolerated for the reaction. In all the
examples examined, good yields and excellent enantiose-
lectivities were obtained (entries 1-6). For the alkene bearing
an ortho-methyl-phenyl substituent, the desired product could
still be obtained in good yield and with excellent enantiose-
lectivity, although much longer reaction was required (entry
(6) For reviews, see: (a) Taylor, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1520. (b) Connon, S. J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 2499. (c)
Yu, X.; Wang, W. Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 516. (d) Schreiner, P. R. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 2003, 32, 289. (e) Akiyama, T.; Itoh, J.; Fuchibe, K. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2006, 348, 999. (f) Doyle, A. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. Chem. ReV. 2007,
107, 5713. For selective examples, see: (g) Zhu, Q.; Lu, Y. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7753. (h) Okino, T.; Hoashi, Y.; Takemoto, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12672. (i) Huang, H.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 7170. (j) Lalonde, M. P.; Chen, Y.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6366. (k) Wang, J.; Li, H.; Yu, X.; Zu, L.; Wang,
W. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4293. (l) Li, B.-J.; Jiang, L.; Liu, M.; Chen, Y.-C.;
Ding, L.-S.; Wu, Y. Synlett 2005, 603. (m) Vakulya, B.; Varga, S.; Csampai,
A.; Soos, T. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1967. (n) McCooey, S. H.; Connon, S. J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6367. (o) Ye, J.; Dixon, D. J.; Hynes,
P. S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4481.
(7) For a catalytic enantioselective synthesis of flavanones and chro-
manones, see: Biddle, M. M.; Lin, M.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 3830.
(8) For reviews and selective examples for asymmetric decarboxylation
reactions, see: (a) Blanchet, J.; Baudoux, J.; Amere, M.; Lasne, M.-C.;
Rouden, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5493. (b) Brunner, H.; Baur, M. A.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2854. (c) Kukula, P.; Matousek, V.; Mallat,
T.; Baiker, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 2859. (d) Detalle, J. F.;
Riahi, A.; Steinmetz, V.; Henin, F.; Muzart, J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
6528. (e) Roy, O.; Diekmann, M.; Riahi, A.; Henin, F.; Muzart, J. Chem.
Commun. 2001, 533.
(9) Alternatively, this two-step reaction sequence could be carried out
without isolating the intermediates. However, we opted to perform the two
steps separately since compounds 4 and 6 tend to have very similar pola-
rity.
(10) Han, X.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Xue, F.; Huang, K.-W.; Lu, Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7604.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 23, 2010
5593