€
Kutt et al.
JOCArticle
-
gas-phase acidities17,18) the pKa values of some of them have
been published in acetic acid,19 most of the acidity data have
been obtained in solvent mixtures of varying composition,
such as aqueous H2SO4 at different concentrations2 or aceto-
nitrile acidified to different extents,15 i.e. not in constant-
composition liquid media. The reported infrared spectro-
scopic scale of the ion-pairing ability of superacid anions
with trioctylammonium counterions;the νNH scale16;is
useful for characterizing anions of superacids, but is not an
equilibrium acidity scale and characterizes the hydrogen
bond acceptor strength of anions rather than the Brønsted
acidity of their parent acids.
and protonated base (HBþA1 and HBþA2-) during the
relative direct acidity measurements:
ΔKip
HA1 þ HBþA2- a HA2 þ HBþA1-
ð3Þ
ð4Þ
aðHBþA1- Þ aðHA2Þ
3
3
ΔpKip ¼ log
aðHBþA2- Þ aðHA1Þ
Assuming that the ratio of activity coefficients of the ion-
paired and neutral species of both acids are similar at any
acidity of the solution;f(HBþA1-)/f(HA1) = f(HBþA2-)/
f(HA2);concentrations of the species can be used instead of
their activities. The counterion HBþ of the acid anions is the
protonated phosphazene base t-BuP1(pyrr) (in a few cases
Alk4Nþ). It is important to emphasize that the directly
measured acidities are so-called ion-pair acidities. Never-
theless, their differences are expected to reflect the differences
of the free ion acidities of the acids: ΔpKa ≈ ΔpKip
The choice of the medium for measurements of the acid
strength of strong acids is not simple. Typical solvents are
either not convenient for acid-base measurements because
of low polarity, poor solvating ability of ions, and polar solutes
(e.g., heptane,20 SO2) or are too basic (e.g., DMSO,21 MeCN22)
for studying strong acids.
In this work, the equilibrium acidities of a large range of
strong acids, many of them superacids, have been measured
in 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) and we present the most com-
prehensive equilibrium superacidity scale that is available to
date in a medium of constant composition.
pKaðHA2Þ - pKaðHA1Þ
½HBþA1- ꢁ ½HA2ꢁ
3
3
¼ ΔpKa ꢀ ΔpKip ¼ log
ð5Þ
½HBþA2- ꢁ ½HA1ꢁ
The necessary condition for this is that the ion-pairing
affects both anions in a similar way and, in particular, there
must be no hydrogen bonding involved. Some of the smaller
anions (such as Cl- and BF4-) may be more strongly influenced
by ion pairing and this may lead to a shift of their pKa values in
the scale relative to the acids with larger anions. Never-
theless, this is not expected to influence the span of the scale
itself because its backbone is built by using acids that on
deprotonation give anions with efficiently delocalized charge.
Such acids and their anions are also not significantly influ-
enced by traces of water in the solvent.25 Since correcting for
this ion-pairing would be somewhat artificial and introduce
additional assumptions (see ref 26) we decided not to correct
and leave the data as they are.
The formation of hydrogen bonding between the acid
anions and the protonated base is hindered by the choice
of the base;t-BuP1(pyrr). The proton in protonated t-BuP1-
(pyrr) is buried between the bulky substituents and the charge
of the bulky cation is highly delocalized. There is strong
evidence against hydrogen bonding between the acid anions
and the protonated phosphazene base:
(1) Low hydrogen bond donicity of protonated phospha-
zenes was among the goals for which phosphazene bases
were initially developed by the Schwesinger group.27 The
proton in the protonated forms of the bulky phosphazene
bases is buried between substituents. This is especially true if
the substituent on the imino nitrogen is bulky (t-Bu in our case)
and if the substituents on the phosphorus are large, such as
pyrrolidinyl (our case), tetramethyl guanidinyl, etc. The
hindrance of the proton in protonated phosphazenes has
DCE is an appropriate solvent for studying superacids
because it combines negligible basic properties and inertness
with the ability to dissolve many polar and ionic compounds.
Although its relative permittivity (εr =10.60) is among the
highest known for chloroalkanes, it is still too low to efficiently
support the dissociation of ion pairs into free ions.23 For this
reason and because of its low ion-solvating ability, relative
ion-pair acidities (ΔpKip) are directly measured. The low
polarity also causes several side processes in acidity measure-
ments: ion-pair formation and homoconjugation are more
extensive in DCE than, for example, in MeCN.
The pKa value is used to describe the equilibrium acidity of
an acid HA in a solvent S:
Ka
-
HA þ S a A þ SHþ
ð1Þ
ð2Þ
-
aðSHþÞ aðA Þ
3
pKa ¼ - log
aðHAÞ
Using the approach22,24 based on relative acidity measure-
ments of acids HA1 and HA2 (see the SI for a description of
the measurement method) there is no need to determine the
activity of the solvated proton in the medium, a(HSþ), or to
take into account the formation of ion pairs of the acid anion
(17) Koppel, A.; Taft, R. W.; Anvia, F.; Zhu, S.-Z.; Hu, L.-Q.; Sung,
K.-S.; DesMarteau, D. D.; Yagupolskii, L. M.; Yagupolskii, Y. L.; Ignatev,
N. V.; Kondratenko, N. V.; Volkonskii, A. Y.; Vlasov, V. M.; Notario, R.;
Maria, P.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3047–3057.
€
(18) Leito, I.; Raamat, E.; Kutt, A.; Saame, J.; Kipper, K.; Koppel, I. A.;
Koppel, I.; Zhang, M.; Mishima, M.; Yagupolskii, L. M.; Garlyauskayte,
R. Y.; Filatov, A. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 8421–8424.
(19) (a) Engelbrecht, A.; Rode, B. M. Monatsh. Chem. 1972, 103, 1315–
1319. (b) Foropoulos, J.; Desmarteau, D. D. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 3720–
3723.
(25) Kaupmees, K.; Kaljurand, I.; Leito, I. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114,
11788–11793.
~~
€
(20) Room, E.-I.; Kaljurand, I.; Leito, I.; Rodima, T.; Koppel, I. A.;
(26) Kaljurand, I.; Rodima, T.; Pihl, A.; Maemets, V.; Leito, I.; Koppel,
I. A.; Mishima, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9988–9993.
Vlasov, V. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7795–7799.
(21) Bordwell, G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 456–463.
(27) Schwesinger, R.; Schlemper, H.; Hasenfratz, C.; Willaredt, J.;
Dambacher, T.; Breuer, T.; Ottaway, C.; Fletschinger, M.; Boele, J.; Fritz,
H.; Putzas, D.; Rotter, H. W.; Bordwell, F. G.; Satish, A. V.; Ji, G.-Z.; Peters,
E.-M.; Peters, K.; Schnering, H. G. V.; Walz, L. Liebigs Ann. 1996, 1055.
(28) Kolomeitsev, A. A.; Koppel, I. A.; Rodima, T.; Barten, J.; Lork, E.;
€
€
(22) Kutt, A.; Leito, I.; Kaljurand, I.; Soovali, L.; Vlasov, V. M.;
Yagupolskii, L. M.; Koppel, I. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2829–2838.
(23) Reichardt, C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry, 3rd
ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003.
€
Roschenthaler, G.-V.; Kaljurand, I.; Kutt, A.; Koppel, I.; Maemets, V.;
Leito, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17656–17666.
€
€
(24) Leito, I.; Rodima, T.; Koppel, I. A.; Schwesinger, R.; Vlasov, V. M.
J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8479–8483.
392 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 76, No. 2, 2011