Lett., 1976, 4295. A synthesis of thioacetone in Freiburg in 1889 was
abandoned after widespread public protests and the evacuation of
whole sectors of the city: see J. Voss, J. Sulfur Chem., 2009, 30, 167;
J. Clayden, et al., Organic Chemistry, OUP, Oxford, 2001, p. 4;
G. W. Kutney and K. Turnbull, J. Chem. Educ., 1984, 61, 372.
3 Y. Mukaiyama, K. Ikegai and W. Pluempanupat, Chem. Lett.,
2005, 34, 638; Y. Mukaiyama, K. Ikegai and W. Pluempanupat,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 2006, 79, 780.
4 M. Kellogg and B. Strijtveen, Tetrahedron, 1987, 43, 5039;
J. M. McFadden, G. L. Frehywot and C. A. Townsend, Org.
Lett., 2002, 4, 3859.
5 C. Palomo, M. Oiarbide, F. Dias, R. Lopez and A. Linden, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 3307; C. Palomo, M. Oiarbide, F. Dias,
R. T. Lopez, P. B. Gonzalez, E. Gomez-Bengoa, J. M. Saa and
A. Linden, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 15236.
6 (a) J. Clayden, W. Farnaby, D. M. Grainger, U. Hennecke,
M. Mancinelli, D. J. Tetlow, I. H. Hillier and M. A. Vincent,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 3410; (b) A. M. Fournier,
R. A. Brown, W. Farnaby, H. Miyatake-Ondozabal and
J. Clayden, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 2222.
7 DMPU tends to increase substantially the nucleophilicity of organo-
lithiums: see ref. 14a and J. Clayden, F. E. Knowles and C. J. Menet,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 3397; J. Clayden, S. Parris, N. Cabedo
and A. H. Payne, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 5060.
Scheme 5 Mechanistic overview.
carbanion centre of 1414 on the migrating aryl ring would yield
a transient dearomatised spirocycle 15 which may or may
not15 be a true intermediate. Ring opening of 15 generates
lithiocarbamate 16 and hence 9 in a reaction related to the
Truce-Smiles rearrangement.16,17
The slight loss of e.r. evident in all the rearrangements, but
particularly that of 8c, 8k, 8m and those involving LDA, was
ascribed to partial racemisation of 14 on the timescale of the
migration (rather than incompletely retentive attack on the
benzyllithium) because the e.r. of the product was found to be
time-dependent. When the rearrangement of 8k with LiTMP
was quenched after only 2 min, 14% 9k was obtained in 87 : 13
e.r., in contrast with an 85% yield and 68 : 32 e.r. after 15 h.
Likewise, treating 8a with LDA over various reaction times
(see supporting information) and quenching with CD3OD
showed that the product 9a was formed in low yield but higher
enantiomeric purity after short reaction times (18% and 94 : 6
e.r. after 10 min) than after longer ones (76% and 88 : 12 e.r.
after 40 min). Remaining starting material recovered from
these reactions was deuterated to the extent of 11% after 2 min
and 40% after 10 min, but was also found to be partially
racemised to an extent corresponding to the degree of deuteration,
suggesting that 14 racemises slowly and rearranges with high
retentive stereospecificity but deuterates essentially stereo-
randomly. The longer reaction times required and higher
e.r.s obtained with LiTMP are presumably a consequence of
slower lithiation coupled with higher configurational stability
resulting from increased steric bulk.18
8 O. Stratmann, B. Kaiser, R. Frohlich, O. Meyer and D. Hoppe,
¨
Chem.–Eur. J., 2001, 7, 423; F. Marr and D. Hoppe, Org. Lett.,
2002, 4, 4217; F. Marr, R. Frohlich and D. Hoppe, Org. Lett.,
¨
1999, 1, 2081. After deprotection of the bulky thiocarbamates,
these methods also allow the synthesis of tertiary thiols by intro-
duction of an alkyl group, rather than the arylation described here.
9 We use ‘‘stereospecific’’ in the sense of Zimmerman
(H. E. Zimmerman, L. Singer and B. S. Thyagarajan, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1959, 81, 108) as recommended by Eliel (E. L. Eliel
and S. H. Wilen, Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds, Wiley,
New York, 1994) to mean a reaction whose stereochemical out-
come is dependent on the stereochemistry of the starting material.
10 X-ray data for (S)-11 has been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Cantre, deposition number 781954.
C22H19NO3S, Mr 377.44, monoclinic, P21, a 7.686(4), b 6.722(3),
c 18.277(0) A, b 93.998(8)1, 2701 reflections of which 2701 unique,
absolute structure parameter 0.09(15).
11 Y. Kawano, N. Kaneko and T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett., 2005, 34,
1612. The invertive substitution was generally reliable except with
electron rich benzylic alcohols, which gave rise to racemic
products, presumably due to intervention of an SN1 pathway.
12 R. A. Batey, C. Yoshina-Ishii, S. D. Taylor and V. Santhakumar,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 2669; J. A. Grzyb, M. Shen,
C. Yoshina-Ishii, W. Chi, R. S. Brown and R. A. Batey, Tetra-
hedron, 2005, 61, 7153.
The rearrangement of thiocarbamates offers chemists the
ability, for the first time, to synthesise a class of chiral tertiary
thiols in an asymmetric manner and to exploit their chemistry.
With many of the most widely used drugs containing sulfur
atoms, we expect this new method for the synthesis of a
previously unavailable compound type of such simplicity to
have an impact of the availability of new targets, both in
medicinal chemistry and also more widely in the design of
ligands for synthetic chemistry.
13 M. C. Whisler, M. MacNeil, V. Snieckus and P. Beak, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 2207.
14 Benzyllithiums may react with either retention or inversion,
depending on the electrophile: J. Clayden, Organolithiums selectivity
for synthesis, Pergamon, Oxford, 2003, pp. 249–256. Aryl migration
in lithiated carbamates is invertive (ref. 6) while aryl migration in
lithiated ureas (ref. 16) is retentive (ref. 16a,b). All reactions of
lithiated benzylthiocarbamates with electrophiles, bar protonation,
are reported to be invertive (ref. 8).
15 A dearomatised intermediate formed during naphthyl migration in
a lithiated urea has been trapped by oxidation (ref. 16a). Calcula-
tions on lithiated carbamates indicate however that in general
cyclic structures such as 15 are not minima on the reaction pathway
(see ref. 6a), and the detailed mechanism of this and related aryl
migrations is still unestablished.
16 For related reactions of ureas, see (a) J. Clayden, J. Dufour,
D. Grainger and M. Helliwell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
7488; (b) J. Clayden, M. Donnard, J. Lefranc, A. Minassi and
D. J. Tetlow, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 6624; (c) J. Clayden
and U. Hennecke, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 3567; (d) R. Bach,
J. Clayden and U. Hennecke, Synlett, 2009, 421.
We are grateful to the Royal Society of Chemistry for
funding this work through the Briggs scholarship (to PM)
and Hickinbottom award (to JC), and to Dr Madeleine
Helliwell for determining the X-ray crystal structure of (S)-11.
Notes and references
1 (a) M. Shibasaki and M. Kanai, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2853;
(b) O. Riant and J. Hannedouche, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2007, 5,
873; (c) P. G. Cozzi, R. Hilgraf and N. Zimmermann, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2007, 5969; (d) F. Schmidt, R. T. Stemmler, J. Rudolph and
C. Bolm, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 454; (e) E. J. Corey and
A. Guzman-Perez, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 388;
(f) M. Hatano and K. Ishihara, Synthesis, 2008, 1647;
(g) P. I. Dosa and G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 445.
2 A. Ohno, K. Nakamura, Y. Shizume and S. Oka, Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 1977, 50, 1003; P. Metzner, J. Vialle and A. Vibet, Tetrahedron
17 T. J. Snape, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 2452.
18 R. W. Hoffmann, R. K. Dress and T. Ruhland, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 1467; R. W. Hoffmann, R. K. Dress, T. Ruhland
and A. Wenzel, Chem. Ber., 1995, 128, 861; B. Kaiser and D. Hoppe,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 323.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 3395–3397 3397