4332
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 108, No. 10, 8 March 1998
Shen et al.
used. Now the pre-exponentials in Eqs. ͑25͒–͑27͒ are
D0ʈ ϭ7.05ϫ1010 Ϫ1, DЌ0 ϭ3.17ϫ1012 Ϫ1, and k20ϭ1.1
ϫ1025 Ϫ1. The uncertainty in D0ʈ is 5.6–8.5ϫ1010 sϪ1 and
Finlay are gratefully acknowledged. We also acknowledge
the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of
Great Britain for the award of research studentships to A.W.
and P.S.M., and Dr. B. Movaghar for helpful discussion on
the mechanism of charge transport in discotic liquid crystals.
R.Y.D. also acknowledges a travel grant from the Associa-
tion of Universities and Colleges of Canada.
s
s
s
in DЌ0 is between 5ϫ1011 sϪ1 and 1.1ϫ1013 Ϫ1. We note
s
that at the low DЌ0 limit, the Dʈ /DЌ ratio is about 2. The
error limits for k20 are between 1.9ϫ1024 sϪ1 and 1ϫ1028
sϪ1 ͑for 13% increase in F). At Tmax , k1Јϭ5.0ϫ1017 sϪ1
and k3Јϭ9.19ϫ1012
4.25ϫ1012 sϪ1 to 2.4ϫ1014
does not affect the fit, its lower limit is found to be 2ϫ1012
Ϫ1. Finally, the calculated spectral densities for HAT6 (Q
s
Ϫ1. The error bar for kЈ3 ranges between
s
Ϫ1. While any larger kЈ1 value
s
ϭ 0.67%͒ are indicated by curves in Figures 6 and 7. Al-
though the final Q value is quite small, there exist large
systematic deviations between the calculated and experimen-
tal spectral densities at some carbon sites ͑e.g., C5). We at-
tribute these discrepancies to the limitation and assumptions
in the model used in the present study. The predicted site
dependencies of various spectral densities at two tempera-
tures are also shown in Figure 8.
In conclusion, we have given a consistent interpretation
of both the quadrupolar splittings and the spin-lattice relax-
ation data measured in the columnar phase of two differently
deuterated HAT6 molecules. From modeling the splittings
with the AP method, we obtain the orienting potential
needed to describe the reorientational dynamics of molecular
disks. It is clear that the tumbling motion of a disk can be
slightly faster than its spinning motion. Given the rotational
diffusion constants are of the order of 108 sϪ1, the packing
of molecular disks within a column must be viewed as a state
of high dynamic mobility. The decoupled model proposed by
Dong18 for correlated internal rotations has been applied for
the first time to a discotic liquid crystal.
Finally, we comment on the very interesting implications
of the results for electronic transport along the molecular
columns. The rotational speeds Dʈ and DЌ are some two
orders of magnitude slower than a typical charge hopping
frequency ͑1010 sϪ1) between the aromatic cores of adjacent
molecules. The implication is that on the time scale of charge
diffusion the ‘‘lattice’’ appears static with disorder being due
to instantaneous displacement of HAT6 molecules with re-
spect to each other. This dynamically induced disorder has
consequences both in the quantum ͑low temperatures͒ and
the stochastic hopping ͑high temperatures͒ limits. In the
quantum limit, the disorder will cause elastic scattering and
reduce the charge mobility. In the stochastic hopping limit it
produces variations in jump frequencies between adjacent
molecules in the columns. This, in turn, gives rise to a fre-
quency dependent diffusivity.
1 S. Chandrasekhar and G. S. Raganath, Rep. Prog. Phys. 53, 57 ͑1990͒.
2 N. Boden, R. Bissell, J. Clements, and B. Movaghar, Curr. Sci. 71, 599
͑1996͒.
3 D. Adam, F. Closs, T. Frey, D. Funhoff, D. Haarer, H. Ringsdorf, P.
Schumacher, and S. K. Siemensmeyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 457 ͑1993͒.
4 D. Adam, P. Schumacher, J. Simmeree, K. H. Etzbach, H. Ringsdorf, and
D. Haarer, Nature ͑London͒ 371, 142 ͑1994͒.
5 N. Boden, R. J. Bushby, J. Clements, B. Movaghar, K. Donovan, and T.
Kreouzis, Phys. Rev. B 52, 13274 ͑1995͒.
6 N. Boden, R. J. Bushby, and J. Clements, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5920 ͑1993͒.
7 R. Y. Dong, D. Goldfarb, M. Moseley, Z. Luz, and H. Zimmermann, J.
Phys. Chem 88, 3148 ͑1984͒.
8 R. Y. Dong, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed.
͑Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997͒.
9 P. L. Nordio and P. Busolin, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 5485 ͑1971͒; P. L. Nor-
dio, G. Rigatti, and U. Segre, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2117 ͑1972͒.
10 R. Tarroni and C. Zannoni, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4550 ͑1991͒.
11 D. Goldfarb, Z. Luz, and H. Zimmermann, J. Phys. ͑Paris͒, Colloq. 42,
1303 ͑1981͒.
12 D. Goldfarb, Z. Luz, and H. Zimmermann, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 7065
͑1983͒.
13 D. Goldfarb, R. Y. Dong, Z. Luz, and H. Zimmermann, Mol. Phys. 54,
1185 ͑1985͒.
14 G. M. Richards and R. Y. Dong, Liq. Cryst. 5, 1011 ͑1989͒.
15 G. Q. Cheng and R. Y. Dong, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 3308 ͑1988͒.
16 S. Marcelja, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 3599 ͑1974͒.
17 J. W. Emsley, G. R. Luckhurst, and C. P. Stockley, Proc. R. Soc. London,
Ser. A 381, 117 ͑1982͒.
18 R. Y. Dong, Phys. Rev. A 43, 4310 ͑1991͒.
19 P. J. Flory, Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules ͑Interscience, New
York, 1969͒.
20 R. Y. Dong, Mol. Phys. 88, 979 ͑1996͒.
21 G. R. Luckhurst, C. Zannoni, P. L. Nordio, and U. Segre, Mol. Phys. 30,
1345 ͑1975͒.
22 C. J. R. Counsell, J. W. Emsley, N. J. Heaton, and G. R. Luckhurst, Mol.
Phys. 54, 847 ͑1985͒.
23 C. J. R. Counsell, Ph.D. thesis, Southampton ͑1983͒; C. J. R. Counsell, J.
W. Emsley, G. R. Luckhurst, and H. S. Sachdev, Mol. Phys. 63, 33
͑1988͒.
24 R. Y. Dong, L. Friesen, and G. M. Richards, Mol. Phys. 81, 1017 ͑1994͒.
25 N. Boden, R. C. Borner, R. J. Bushby, and A. N. Cammidge, UK Pat.
Appl. 9312091.3, 11th June 1993.
26 For a review of Ullmann coupling reactions see M. Goshaev, O. S.
Otroschenka, and A. A. Sadykov, Russ. Chem. Rev. 41, 12 ͑1972͒.
27 N. Boden, R. C. Borner, R. J. Bushby, A. N. Cammidge, and M. V.
Jesudason, Liq. Cryst. 15, 851 ͑1993͒.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
28 W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling,
Numerical Recipes ͑Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986͒.
The financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engi-
neering Council of Canada and the technical assistance of N.
130.70.241.163 On: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:44:22