Supramolecular Chemistry
93
diacid chloride (1.3 g, 6.4 mmol) in dry DCM followed by
addition of triethylamine (1.4 mmol) under nitrogen
atmosphere. The reaction mixture was allowed to stirring
for overnight. After completion of the reaction, the solvent
was removed under vacuum. The residual mass was
extracted with CHCl3 –CH3OH mixture (3£ 20 ml).
The organic layer was washed with NaHCO3 solution
(3£ 15 ml) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent
was removed and the residual mass was purified by column
chromatography over silica gel using chloroform–
methanol (4:1) as the eluent to afford the desired
compound 6 (730 mg, 36% yield, mp 2108C).
noted. Then, for the complexes of receptors 1 and 2 with
guests, [A0/(A 2 A0)] as a function of the inverse of guest
concentration was plotted. The plot fits a linear
relationship, indicating the 1:1 stoichiometry of the
receptor–guest complex. The ratio for the intercept versus
slope gives the association or binding constant (Ka) for
the receptor–guest complex shown in Tables 1 and 2.
A similar experiment was done with 1 and 2 in the
fluorescence and the emission intensities were recorded to
evaluate the binding constant values. In NMR, Dd/[G ] as a
function of Dd was plotted. The plot fits a linear
relationship and the slope of the curve gives the binding
constant value. Stoichiometries of the complexes were
determined from the break of the titration curves which
were obtained from the plot of Dd versus [G ]/[H ].
1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): d 10.69 (s, 2H, amide
NH), 8.96 (d, J ¼ 2 Hz, 2H), 8.59 (s, 1H), 8.33 (d,
J ¼ 4 Hz, 2H), 8.23–8.18 (m, 4H), 7.74 (t, J ¼ 8 Hz, 1H),
7.43 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 1H) ppm. 13C
NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz): d 166.2, 145.6, 142.9, 136.5,
135.5, 131.8, 129.6, 128.2, 128.0, 124.4 ppm. FT-IR (KBr)
n: 3418, 3054, 1676, 1613, 1585, 1556, 1481, 1429 cm21
Mass (ESI): 319.1 [MþH]þ, 225.2, 130.2.
.
Acknowledgements
We thank CSIR, New Delhi, India for financial support. A.R.S.
thanks the University of Kalyani, West Bengal, India for a
University Research Fellowship. We acknowledge DST, New
Delhi, India for providing facilities in the department under DST
FIST Programme.
N1-[7-(3-[(3-[(1-[7-(Acetylamino)[1,8]naphthyridin-2-
yl]methyl-3-pyridiniumyl)amino]
carbonylbenzoyl)amino]-1-pyridiniumylmethyl)
[1,8]naphthyridin-2-yl]acetamide
dihexafluorophosphate (2)
References
(1) (a) Rurack, R.; Resch-Genger, U. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31,
116–127. (b) Pu, L. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1687–1716.
(c) de Silva, A.P.; Gunaratne, H.Q.N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.;
Huxley, A.J.M.; McCoy, C.P.; Rademacher, J.T.; Rice,
T.E. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515–1566. (d) Czarnik,
A.W. Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Molecular
Recognition, ACS Symposium Series 538; American
Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1993. (e) Czarnik,
A.W. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 423–428.
(2) (a) Alvarez-Rua, C.; Garcia-Granda, S.; Goswami, S.;
Mukherjee, R.; Dey, S.; Claramunt, R.M.; Santa Maria,
M.D.; Rozas, I.; Jagerovic, N.; Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J. New
J. Chem. 2004,28,700–707.(b)Lighthart,G.B.W.L.;Ohkawa,
H.; Sijbesma, R.P.; Meijer, E.W. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
375–378.
(3) Ghosh, K.; Sen, T.; Frohlich, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
2935–2938.
(4) Goswami, S.; Mukherjee, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
1619–1622.
(5) (a) Corbin, P.S.; Zimmerman, S.C.; Thiessen,
P.A.; Hawryluk, N.A.; Murray, T.J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 10475–10488. (b) Ma, Y.; Kolotuchin,
S.V.; Zimmerman, S.C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
13757–13769.
Compound 6 (0.05 g, 0.16 mmol) was treated with 2-N-
acetyl-7-bromomethyl-1,8-naphthyridine (0.13 g, 0.47) in
dry CH3CN and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 48 h
to afford the salt 7 (0.023 g, 0.14 mmol), which was used in
the next step for reaction with NH4PF6 in MeOH for anion
exchange. The reaction yielded the desired compound 2 in
13% yield (30 mg, mp 1948C) as a grey solid.
1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): d 11.45 (s, 2H, amide
NH), 11.08 (s, 2H, amide NH), 9.61 (s, 2H), 8.94 (brs, 2H),
8.79 (brd, 2H), 8.63 (brt, 2H), 8.51 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 2H), 8.46
(d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 2H), 8.39 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 2H), 8.26 (brs, 3H),
7.78 (brs, 1H), 7.71 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 2H), 6.33 (s, 4H), 2.10 (s,
6H) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): d 170.1,
165.9, 157.1, 154.6, 153.8, 139.5, 138.3, 137.3, 136.0,
131.7, 131.6, 129.0, 127.8, 127.6, 119.3, 119.0, 115.0,
64.4, 23.9 ppm (two carbons in the aromatic region are
missing due to overlapping). FT-IR (KBr) n: 3747, 3435,
1688, 1608, 1552, 1504, 1437 cm21. Mass (ESI): 863
[M2 PF6–1]þ, 717 [M22PF6 2 1], 518.2, 476.2, 359.3.
(6) Nelson, D.L.; Cox, M.M. Lehninger Principles of
Biochemistry, 3rd ed.; Worth Publishers: New York, 2000.
(7) Moss, J.; Lane, M.D. In Advances in Enzymology; Meister,
A., Ed.; Interscience Publishers: New York, 1971; pp
321–442.
(8) (a) Melville, D.B.; Moyer, A.W.; Hofmann, K.; du Vigneand,
V. J. Biol. Chem. 1942, 146, 487–492. (b) De Titta,
G.T.; Edmouds, J.W.; Stallings, W.; Donohue, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1976, 98, 1920–1926 and references cited therein.
Binding studies
The studies on binding properties of 1 and 2 were carried
out in different solvents such as DMSO and CH3CN
containing 1.2% DMSO. The UV–vis titrations were
carried out with 1 and 2 by adding different amounts of
guests. The absorbance value during each addition was