Inorganic Chemistry
COMMUNICATION
isosbestic point at 520 nm suggests a clean conversion of the
N/N•+ process. A further addition of SbCl5 causes no further
change of the spectrum.
EPR plots of 2 and 3 after one-electron oxidation. This material is
The absorption spectral changes of complex 3 in response to the
addition of SbCl5 are shown in Figures 2c and S5 and S6 in the
Supporting Information. Upon the gradual addition of the oxidant,
one of the di-p-anisylamino sites was first oxidized to the N•+
species. The absorption spectrum shows changes similar to those in
complex 2 except that a clear shoulder band around 1160 nm grows
gradually (highlighted with a red circle). Upon a further addition of
the oxidant, the second triarylamine unit was oxidized as well. The
previously observed shoulder disappears gradually, and the N•+
band around 800 nm shifts bathochromically slightly. On the basis
of these facts, the shoulder band at 1160 nm is assigned to the IVCT
transition of the chemically generated MV complex of 3. Part of the
NIR transitions of the one-electron-oxidized intermediate of com-
plex 3 is shown in Figure 2d. Because the IVCT band is overlapped
with the intense M f N•+ transition (around 1400 nm), we assume
that the IVCT band is symmetrical and Gaussian-shaped. Thus, the
black line from the experimental data is deconvoluted into the IVCT
band (red line) and the M f N•+ transition (blue line), as shown in
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: zhongyuwu@iccas.ac.cn.
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Grant 21002104), the National Basic Research 973 program of
China (Grant 2011CB932301), and the Institute of Chemistry,
Chinese Academy of Sciences (“100 Talent” Program), for
funding support.
’ REFERENCES
(1) (a) D’Alessandro, D. M.; Keene, F. R. Chem. Rev. 2006,
106, 2270. (b) Kaim, W.; Lahiri, G. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 1778.
(2) Aguirre-Etcheverry, P.; O’Hare, D. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4839.
(3) Nelsen, S. E. Chem.—Eur. J. 2000, 6, 581.
(4) (a) Zhou, G.; Baumgarten, M.; M€ullen, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 12211. (b) Barlow, S.; Risko, C.; Chung, S.-J.; Tucker, N. M.;
Coropceanu, V.; Jones, S. C.; Levi, Z.; Brꢀedas, J.-L.; Marder, S. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16900. (c) Lambert, C.; N€oll, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 8434. (d) Lambert, C.; N€oll, G.; Schelter, J. Nat. Mater. 2002,
1, 69. (e) Barlow, S.; Risko, C.; Coropceanu, V.; Tucker, N. M.; Jones,
S. C.; Levi, Z.; Khrustalev, V. N.; Antipin, M. Y.; Kinniburgh, T. L.;
Timofeeva, T.; Marder, S. R.; Brꢀedas, J.-L. Chem. Commun. 2005, 764.
(f) Lambert, C.; Risko, C.; Coropceanu, V.; Schelter, J.; Amthor, S.;
Gruhn, N. E.; Durivage, J. C.; Brꢀedas, J.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 8508.
Figure 2d. The IVCT band centers at 1240 nm (νmax = 8050 cmꢀ1
)
)
with εmax of 8700 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1 and a full width at half-height (Δν1/2
of 1800 cmꢀ1. The electronic coupling parameter Hab is estimated
to be 600 cmꢀ1, according to the Hush formula: Hab = 0.0206-
(εmax maxΔν1/2)
1/2/rab,16 where rab is the diabatic electron-transfer
ν
distance and is taken to be the intramolecular NꢀN crystallographic
ꢀ
distance (dNꢀN, 12.26 Å). It should be noted that the true rab may
be much shorter than dNꢀN because of delocalization of the charge
from the amine site into the bridging group.17 Thus, the calculated
Hab value is likely to be a lower limit. This value is on the same
order with those for mixed-valent di-p-anisylamines bridged
by C6H4CtCC6H4CtCC6H4,4c C6H4CtCPtCtCC6H4,9 or
C6H4CtCCtCC6H4.4c However, it is lower than those for
4c
(5) Ning, Z.; Tian, H. Chem. Commun. 2009, 5483.
mixed-valent di-p-anisylamines bridged by C6H4CtCC6H4 or
(6) (a) Schubert, S. S.; Eschbaumer, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 2892. (b) Eryazici, I.; Moorefield, C. N.; Newkome, G. R. Chem. Rev.
2008, 108, 1834. (c) Constable, E. C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 246.
(7) Flores-Torres, S.; Hutchison, G. R.; Stoltzberg, L. J.; Abru~na,
H. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1513.
(8) Sakamoto, R.; Sasaki, T.; Honda, N.; Yamamura, T. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 5156.
(9) Jones, S. C.; Coropceanu, V.; Barlow, S.; Kinnibrugh, T.;
Timofeeva, T.; Brꢀedas, J.-L.; Marder, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
11782.
C6H4CHdCHC6H44b with similar NꢀN distances. Finally, it was
found that one-electron-oxidized species of both 2 and 3 show clear
electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals at 77 K with g
factors of 2.044 and 2.002 (Figures S7 and S8 in the Supporting
Information), respectively. This supports that the spin is largely
nitrogen-centered. However, the observation of a discernible axial
splitting (g1 = 2.043) of complex 3 after one-electron oxidation
points to an appreciable metal character of the free radical.
To conclude, the electronic communication between two di-p-
anisylamines bridged by a [Ru(tpy)2] motif was estimated by
analyzing the IVCT band of the corresponding MV monoradical-
cation species. As illustrated in this contribution, the concept of
assembling organic redox centers with transition-metal com-
plexes as the bridge, instead of the conventional MꢀBLꢀM
arrangement (M refers to an organometallic or inorganic redox
center and BL is an organic bridge), is important for the future
design and synthesis of new types of MV systems. The quanti-
fication of the electronic coupling between two amine redox sites
bridged by linear transition-metal complexes provides useful
information in terms of their applications as conducting molec-
ular wires.
(10) Robson, K. C. K.; Koivisto, B. D.; Gordon, T. J.;
Baumgartner, T.; Berlinguette, C. P. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 5335.
(11) Yang, J.-S.; Lin, Y.-H.; Yang, C.-S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 777.
(12) Crystallographic data for (3)2(CHCl3)13(NO3)4: C129H109
-
Cl39N20O20Ru2, M = 3844.05, triclinic, a = 10.858(2) Å, b = 18.726(4)
ꢀ
Å, c = 20.548(4) Å, R = 97.57(3)°, β = 102.43(3)°, γ = 90.03(3)°, U =
ꢀ3
4042.3(14) Å , T = 173 K, space group P1, Z = 1, 11 514 reflections
ꢀ
measured, radiation type Mo KR, radiation wavelength 0.710 73 Å, final
R indices R1 = 0.1242 and wR2 = 0.3267, and R indices (all data) R1 =
0.1329 and wR2 = 0.3380.
(13) Sreenath, K.; Thomas, T. G.; Gopidas, K. R. Org. Lett. 2011,
13, 1134.
(14) Matis, M.; Rapta, P.; Lukeꢁs, V.; Hartmann, H.; Dunsch, L.
J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 4451.
(15) Kc = 10ΔE (mV)/59 for a room temperature case. See ref 1.
(16) (a) Hush, N. S. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1967, 8, 391. (b) Hush, N. S.
Coord. Chem. Rev. 1985, 64, 135.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S
Supporting Information. Syntheses and characteriza-
(17) Heckmann, A.; Amothor, S.; Lambert, C. Chem. Commun.
2006, 2959.
b
tion, NMR spectra of new compounds, CV profiles of 1ꢀ3,
CIF file of 3, plots of spectral changes of 3 upon oxidation, and
6849
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic200701j |Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 6847–6849