Modified nucleosides have been generally used as biologi-
cal tools as well as chemotherapeutic agents.[1] DNA or
RNA building blocks have extensively been utilised as ex-
cellent templates for the development of modified nucleo-
sides. Extensive modifications have been done on the fura-
nose ring of DNA or RNA, resulting in the 4’-oxonucleo-
sides, referred to as the first-generation nucleosides
(Figure 1).[2] On the basis of bioisoteric rationale, 4’-thionu-
formidable obstacle in the synthesis of purine nucleosides is
the correct identification of the N3, N7, or N9 isomers.
Given the inherent difficulties, whether or not the N7
isomer and/or the N3 isomer is rearranged to the desired N9
isomer during the condensation reactions remains a contro-
versial issue.[7,8] Thus, it is also meaningful to establish the
rearrangement of the isomers formed during the synthesis of
the 4’-selenopurine nucleosides.
Recently the synthesis of N9-4’-selenoadenosine (1a,
Figure 1), which may serve as a new RNA purine building
block was reported, using a Pummerer-type condensation of
4-selenoxide with 6-chloropurine.[5c] It was concluded that
the initially formed N3- or N7-6-chloropurine derivative re-
arranged to the N9-6-acetoxypurine derivative on being
heated with acetic acid, which further converted to 1a after
being treated with methanolic ammonia.[5c] However, from
our study it was concluded the N7-4’-selenoinosine had been
synthesised (13b, without the expected rearrangement) in-
stead of the desired N9-4’-selenoadenosine (Supporting In-
formation, Figures S1 and S2). Herein, we report the first
synthesis of new RNA purine building blocks, 4’-selenoade-
nosine and 4’-selenoguanosine (1b) and the structural revi-
sion, and unveil our insights to confirm the regioisomeric re-
arrangement along with the studies on the unusual dynamic
mixture of sugar puckerings.
Figure 1. Rationale for the development of new RNA purine building
blocks.
Our synthesis of 4’-selenoadenosine (1a) and 4’-seleno-
guanosine (1b) commenced with the synthesis of 4-seleno-
ACHUTNGERNsNUG ugAHCTUNGTRNENaUGN r 6 starting from d-ribose (Scheme 1). d-Ribose was
cleosides[3] and carbocyclic nucleosides,[4] referred to as the
second-generation nucleosides, have been developed. Re-
cently, new 4’-selenopyrimidine nucleosides, also called the
third-generation nucleosides, were synthesised using a Pum-
merer-type condensation of the 4-selenoxide and pyrimidine
bases.[5] From the X-ray crystallographic study, it was discov-
ered that 4’-selenouridine adopted the C2’-endo/C3’-exo
twist (south) conformation, which is different from that of
uridine, which takes the C2’-exo/C3’-endo (north) conforma-
tion.[5a] Thus, it is interesting to synthesise the 4’-selenopur-
ine nucleosides and to compare their conformations with
those of the 4’-selenopyrimidine nucleosides.
converted to 2,3-O-isopropylidene-l-lyxono-1,4-lactone (2)
by a known method.[9] The primary hydroxyl group of 2 was
protected with TBDPS group to give 3, which on reduction
with NaBH4 produced diol 4. Mesylation of 4 followed by
selenenation gave the desired 4-selenosugar 6. This was effi-
ciently oxidised to 4-selenoxide 7 with mCPBA at À788C.
Although the intermediate 7 served as an efficient glycosyl
donor during the synthesis of 4-selenoribofuranosyl pyrimi-
dines under the Pummerer-type conditions,[5a,b] similar at-
tempts towards the condensation reaction of 7 with 6-chlo-
Purine nucleosides are generally synthesised by condens-
ing the glycosyl donor with a purine base in the presence of
a Lewis acid. It is believed that glycosylation of purines is
rarely regioselective and usually produces the unnatural N7
or N3 isomer along with the natural N9 isomer.[6] Another
ACHUTGTNRENrNUG oACHTGNUTRENNUpG urine failed (see the Supporting Information). There-
after, an alternative strategy involving the conversion of 7 to
the corresponding 4-selenoacetate 8 was envisioned. This
could be then condensed under classical Vorbrꢁggen condi-
tions with silylated 6-chloropurine in the presence of
TMSOTf.
Condensation of 8 with silylated 6-chloropurine in the
presence of TMSOTf afforded a mixture of N9 and N7 re-
gioisomers through the rearrangement of the N7 to N9 re-
gioisomer. Attempts to optimise this reaction in favour of
the N9 regioisomer were made (Supporting Information,
Table S1). The best result (N9 isomer=49%, N7 isomer=
15%) was obtained in toluene at 958C after 15 h. The struc-
tures of regioisomers 9 and 10 were confirmed by the analy-
[a] J. Yu, Dr. J.-H. Kim, Dr. H. W. Lee, Prof. V. Alexander,
Prof. W. J. Choi, Prof. L. S. Jeong
Department of Bioinspired Science and College of Pharmacy
Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750 (Korea)
Fax : (+82)2-3277-2851
[b] Prof. H.-C. Ahn, Prof. W. J. Choi
College of Pharmacy, Dongguk University
Gyeonggi-do 410-820 (Korea)
1
sis of the H and 13C NMR spectra, in which the signals for
[c] Prof. J. Choi
H-8, C-4, C-8, and H-1’ are shielded whereas the signal for
C-5 is deshielded in the N9 isomer 10 when compared with
the N7 isomer 9 (Supporting Information, Table S2). Their
structures were finally confirmed by the X-ray crystallogra-
Department of Chemistry, Univeristy of Suwon
Gyeonggi-do 445-743 (Korea)
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
&
2
&
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 0000, 00, 0 – 0
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!