To determine the stoichiometry of metal ion binding, monomer
1 (Fig. 4) was prepared as a model compound and its
coordination mode with Cd2+ ion was examined by
1H NMR and UV-Vis spectroscopy. From Fig. 4A, it can be
seen that the NMR signals of the triazolyl and aminophenyl
protons (Ha, Hb, Hc, and CH3) of 1 are significantly shifted to
the down-field direction upon titration with Cd2+ ion. The
protons on the central phenyl ring (Hd) however show only a
slight up-field shift. The results indicate that the amino and
triazole groups are both metal ion receptors to effectively
interact with Cd2+. This binding mode concurs with the 1 : 4
binding stoichiometry (1ꢀ[Cd2+]4) manifested by the Job plot
analysis shown in Fig. 4B. Furthermore, the UV-Vis titration
data of 1 with Cd2+ (Fig. 4C) was subjected to SPECFIT
analysis10 (Fig. S-17, ESIw), the result of which validates the
1 : 4 binding ratio and gives a binding constant of logb = 1.10 Æ
0.06 MÀ4
.
In conclusion, we have found that incorporation of the
‘‘click’’-generated triazole linker into the side chain of PPEs
enables excellent fluorescence turn-on sensing function for
Zn2+ and Cd2+ ions in THF, H+ and Cd2+ ions in water.
The remarkable sensitivity and selectivity displayed by sensors
PPE-1 and PPE-4 bode well for a wide range of applicability;
in particular, the water-soluble PPE-4 is expected to be a
useful sensor for Cd2+ ion detection in various applications.
This work was supported by NSERC, CFI, IRIF, and
Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Fig. 4 (A) 1H NMR titration of compound 1 (6.8 mM) with
Cd(ClO4)2 in DMSO-d6. (B) Job plot of compound 1 in DMSO-d6
(Ds: shift of the CH3 signal; w: molar fraction). (C) UV-Vis spectro-
scopic titration of compound 1 (15 mM) in DMSO with Cd2+ at
concentrations of 0.0, 5.0, 9.9, 15, 20, 24, 29, 34, 38, 43, 48, 52, 57, 65,
74, 83, 91, 110, 130, 170, 200, 260, and 330 mM.
interaction of Cd2+ ion with PPE-4. Upon titration of PPE-4
with TFA in water, much stronger fluorescence enhancement
(29-fold) and higher sensitivity (detection limit: 0.3 mM) in
comparison to Cd2+ sensing were observed. The prominent
spectral responses to TFA in water indicate that PPE-4 is more
prone to protic acids than metal ions under aqueous conditions.
Unlike the two-stage scenario in Cd2+ titration, the titration of
PPE-4 with TFA showed only a monotonic emission increase at
492 nm (Fig. S-9, ESIw). The different titration curves suggest that
Cd2+ might be preferentially bound to the triazole ligand over the
amino group at the early stage of titration. In a sharp contrast to
PPE-1, the sensitivity of PPE-4 for Zn2+ in water was rather
diminutive. The statistical graph in Fig. 3B clearly reveals the
ability of PPE-4 to differentiate Cd2+ and Zn2+ ions in water.
On the side chains of the two PPE sensors, N-containing
amino and triazole groups were both expected to act as
receptors (ligands) for metal ions. In theory the binding of
metal ions to the amino groups should reduce their electron-
donating ability. The interaction of Cd2+ with either the
amino or the triazolyl groups would raise the energy of the
ICT state such that excited-state quenching of the PPE back-
bone becomes endergonic. The proposed mechanism differs
from the mechanistic arguments made by Jones Jr. and
co-workers.2c In the meantime, the binding of triazole with
metal ions can also alter non-radiative deactivation steps in the
mechanism. In this respect, characterization of the polymer-
metal ion interactions is of great value to further unraveling
the detailed photophysical mechanisms of the click-functionalized
PPE fluorescence turn-on sensors.
Notes and references
1 (a) S. W. Thomas, G. D. Joly and T. M. Swager, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 1339; (b) H. N. Kim, Z. Guo, W. Zhu, J. Yoon and H. Tian,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 79; (c) L.-J. Fan, Y. Zhang,
C. B. Murphy, S. E. Angell, M. F. L. Parker, B. R. Flynn and
W. E. Jones Jr., Coord. Chem. Rev., 2009, 253, 410.
2 (a) D. T. McQuade, A. H. Hegedus and T. M. Swager, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 12389; (b) H. Tong, L. Wang, X. Jing and
F. Wang, Macromolecules, 2003, 36, 2584; (c) L-J. Fan, Y. Zhang
and W. E. Jones Jr., Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 2844; (d) X. Huang,
Y. Xu, L. Zheng, J. Meng and Y. Cheng, Polymer, 2009, 50, 5996;
(e) H. Wang, J. Lin, W. Huang and W. Wei, Sens. Actuators, B,
2010, 150, 798; (f) K-Y. Pu and B. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2009,
19, 277.
3 (a) A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A. J.
M. Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher and T. E. Rice, Chem.
Rev., 1997, 97, 1515; (b) B. Valeur, Molecular Fluorescence Principles
and Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002; (c) A. W. Czarnik,
Acc. Chem. Res., 1994, 27, 302; (d) Fluorescent: Chemosensors for Ion
and Molecular Recognition, ed. A. W. Czarnik, American Chemical
Society, Washington, DC, 1993.
4 E. M. Nolan and S. J. Lippard, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 42, 193.
5 S. S. Tan, S. J. Kim and E. T. Kool, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,
133, 2664.
6 L-J. Fan and W. E. Jones Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6784.
7 (a) U. H. F. Bunz, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 1605; (b) Design and
Synthesis of Conjugated Polymers, ed. M. Leclerc and J. -F. Morin,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2010.
8 J. Lahann, Click Chemistry for Biotechnology and Materials
Science, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, 2009.
9 Z. R. Grabowski, K. Rotkiewicz and W. Rettig, Chem. Rev., 2003,
103, 3899.
10 (a) M. Meader and A. D. Zuberbuhler, Anal. Chem., 1990,
62, 2220; (b) H. Gampp, M. Maeder, C. J. Meyer and
A. D. Zuberbuhler, Talanta, 1985, 32, 251.
c
11016 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 11014–11016
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011