stoichiometric oxidants has emerged at the forefront of
this growing trend.12
triethylamine as an example).18 This, in turn, correlates to
a calculatedpKa of the R-CꢀH bond to be 26.7 pKa units.19
By exploiting this inherent physical characteristic of amino
radical cations, we anticipated that we could generate
iminium ions via direct H-atom abstraction or deprotona-
tion and oxidation of the resultant R-amino radical. Due
to several divergent pathways available to the R-amino
radical, and slow catalyst turnover with oxygen, we have
focused upon accelerating the R-CꢀH oxidation chemistry
through modification of the stoichiometric oxidant driven
by our mechanistic observations, thus biasing the pathway
to the iminium ion.20ꢀ22
We began our investigation by choosing a suitable
reaction for optimization, one capable of representing a
broad set of nucleophiles. Based upon this requisite, the
cyanation of tetrahydroisoquinolines was chosen. Our
initial cyanation attempts involved using Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)-
PF6 (1 mol %) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) under
white light irradiation (Table 1). Ethyl R-bromoacetate
(EtO2CCH2Br) was chosen as the stoichiometric oxidant
with N-phenyltetrahydroisoquinoline as the substrate and
NaCN as the nucleophile.
Figure 1. Physical properties of amino radical cations and their
potential for diversification under visible-light-mediated photo-
redox catalysis.
In the event, a low isolated yield of the product was
obtained (36%, entry 1). As a result, we switched the
photocatalyst to Ru(bpy)3Cl2 and the light source to blue
LEDs. Diethyl bromomalonate [(Et2OC)2CHBr] was first
selected as the oxidant to probe the reactivity for this
process given the precedented ability of Ru1þ to reduce
the CꢀBr bond. Subsequently, an encouraging 95% iso-
lated yield of cyanation product 2 was obtained (entry 2).
Unfortunately, general application of this oxidant is im-
practical due to its potential side reactivity arising from the
resultant malonyl radical and diethylmalonate generated
after H-atom abstraction. Changing the stoichiometric
oxidant to carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) significantly de-
creased the rate and overall yield, in both DMF and
acetonitrile (CH3CN) (entries 3, 4). In testing the conver-
sion of starting material, BrCCl3 in DMF was found to be
a suitable alternative for catalytic turnover and full con-
version of tetrahydroisoquinoline to the iminium ion was
observed in <3 h (vida infra).
Several synthetic organic groups13ꢀ15 have harnessed the
inherent characteristics of light-active metal complexes such
as Ru(bpy)3Cl2 to promote chemical transformations.16
These metal complexes hold advantages over alternative
reagents for light/energy conversions since their photochem-
ical properties may be fine-tuned through manipulation of
ligand/metal combinations, thus enabling augmentations of
redox potentials.13 As a consequence, a complete overhaul
of reaction design can be avoided.
During our initial investigations into reductive dehalo-
genations using Ru(bpy)3Cl2 in the presence of HCO2H•
iPr2NEt, we discovered, through deuterium labeling experi-
i
ments, that Pr2NEt was a major H-atom donor.17 As
depicted in Figure 1, Ru2þ* (Ered = þ0.84 V vs SCE) is
able to oxidize tertiary amines to generate the correspond-
ing amino radical cation. Accordingly, the bond dissocia-
tion energy (BDE) of the R-CꢀH bond is dramatically
lowered (90.7 kcal/mol BDE drops to ∼17 kcal/mol using
(18) Wayner, D. D. M.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Griller, D. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 1986, 131, 189.
(12) For reviews on the photophysical properties of photoredox
catalysts, see: (a) Juris, A.; Balzani, V.; Barigelletti, F.; Campagna, S.;
Belser, P.; Von Zelewsky, V. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1988, 84, 85. (b)
Kalyanasundaram, K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 46, 159.
(13) (a) Pham, P. V.; Nagib, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6119 and references therein. (b) Nicewicz, D.;
MacMillan, D. W. C. Science 2008, 322, 77.
(14) (a) Hurtley, A. E.; Cimesia, M. A.; Ischay, M. A.; Yoon, T. P.
Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 4442. (b) Ischay, M. A.; Anzovino, M. E.; Du, J.;
Yoon, T. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12886 and references therein.
(15) (a) Dai, C.; Narayanam, J. M. R.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Nat.
Chem. 2011, 3, 140. (b) Furst, L.; Narayanam, J. M. R.; Stephenson,
C. R. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9655.
(19) See the Supporting Information for pKa approximation derived
from the following: (a) Zhang, X.; Bordwell, F. G. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 4163. (b) Xu, W.; Mariano, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1431.
(c) Dombrowski, G. W.; Dinnocenzo, J. P.; Farid, S.; Goodman, J. L.;
Gould, I. R. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 64, 427. (d) Nelsen, S. P.; Ippoliti, J. T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4879. (e) Nicholas, M.; de, P.; Arnold,
D. R. Can. J. Chem. 1982, 60, 2165.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(20) Condie, A. G.; Gonzalez-Gomez, J. C.; Stephenson, C. R. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1464.
(21) For advances in R-CꢀH oxidation of tertiary amines using
photoredox catalysis, see: (a) Zou, Y.-Q.; Lu, L.-Q.; Fu, L.; Chang,
N.-J.; Rong, J.; Chen, J.-R.; Xiao, W.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
7171. (b) Xuan, J.; Cheng, Y.; An, J.; Lu, L.-Q.; Zhang, X.-X.; Xiao,
W.-J. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8337. (c) Rueping, M.; Zhu, S.; Koenigs,
R. M. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 8679. (d) Rueping, M.; Vila, C.;
Koenigs, R. M.; Poscharny, K.; Fabry, D. C. Chem. Commun. 2011,
47, 2360.
(16) For other selected examples of photoredox catalysis in organic
ꢀ
applications, see: (a) Andrews, R. S.; Becker, J. J.; Gagne, M. R. Org.
Lett. 2011, 13, 2406. (b) Maji, T.; Karmakar, A.; Reiser, O. J. Org.
ꢀ
Chem. 2011, 76, 736. (c) Andrews, S. R.; Becker, J. J.; Gagne, M. R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7274. (d) Koike, T.; Akita, M. Chem.
Lett. 2009, 38, 166.
(17) Narayanam, J. M. R.; Tucker, J. W.; Stephenson, C. R. J. J. Am.
(22) For a recent example of R-CꢀH oxidation of tertiary amines
using organic dye-mediated photoredox catalysis, see: Hari, D. P.;
€
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8756.
Konig, B. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3852.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 1, 2012
95