Fig. 5 Visual detection of gaseous phosgene with dRB-EDA absorbed
paper stripes. The strips were placed in sealed flasks containing phenan-
thridine (A), triphosgene (B) or phenanthridine and triphosgene (C) and
then immediately photographed.
In summary, dRB-EDA, a rhodamine-deoxylactam containing
chemodosimeter, was demonstrated to be sensitive for sensing of
triphosgene with a detection limit of 50 nM. The assay proceeds
via analyte triggered opening of the deoxylactam of dRB-EDA
and afforded deep-colored and highly fluorescent species. Given
the promptness of the color formation, low-background inter-
ference, and high sensitivity of this assay, dRB-EDA is attractive
for on-spot detection of gaseous phosgene with routine instru-
ments or ‘‘naked eyes’’.
Fig. 4 Assay efficiency of selected rhodamine-(deoxy)lactams.
(A) Chemical structures of the rhodamine-(deoxy)lactam based chemodo-
simeters; (B) fluorogenic responses of rhodamine-hydroxamate (in green),
rhodamine-hydrazide (in blue) and RB-EDA (in red) towards triphosgene
(1 mM) in DMF as compared to dRB-EDA (in black); (C) fluorescence
emission spectra of dRB-EDA (red) in DMF upon addition of triphosgene
(1 mM, in black) or formaldehyde (10 mM, in blue) (lex@560 nm).
which is analogous to the reported sensing of diethyl chlorophos-
phate.8 Consistent with the documentation that hydrazide could
react with phosgene to form 1,3,4-oxadiazole,7 HRMS indicated
that the detection of triphosgene with rhodamine-hydrazide was
achieved via phosphorylation triggered opening of the lactam,
leading to a 1,3,4-oxadiazole containing rhodamine derivative
(ESIw, Scheme S4 and Fig. S14). Albeit being able to detect tri-
phosgene with rapid kinetics (ESIw, Fig. S3 and S4), rhodamine-
hydroxamate and rhodamine-hydrazide were much inferior to
dRB-EDA in terms of assay sensitivity.
This work was supported by grants from NSFC (No.
21072162 and 20802060), Natural Science Foundation of
Fujian Province of China (No. 2011J06004), the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2011121020)
and NEFTBS (No. J1030415).
Notes and references
1 (a) Br. Med. J., 1939, 2, 1243; (b) J. J. Collins, D. M. Molenaar,
L. O. Bowler, T. J. Harbourt, M. Carson, B. Avashia, T. Calhoun,
C. Vitrano, P. Ameis, R. Chalfant and P. Howard, J. Occup.
Environ. Med., 2011, 53, 239.
2 (a) W. I. Glass, N. Z. Med. J., 1972, 75, 121; (b) S. A. Cucinell, Arch.
Environ. Health, 1974, 28, 272.
A potential competitive reaction using dRB-EDA is the
fluorogenic reaction with aldehydes.6c Fig. 4C shows that
dRB-EDA could detect 1 mM of triphosgene with superior
sensitivity and assay kinetics relative to 10 mM of formalde-
hyde under the same assay conditions,6c suggesting its good
selectivity in sensing of gaseous phosgene.
3 (a) G. G. Esposito, D. Lillian, G. E. Podolak and R. M. Tuggle,
Anal. Chem., 1977, 49, 1774; (b) H. H. Hill Jr. and S. J. Martin, Pure
Appl. Chem., 2002, 74, 2281; (c) R. Jeltes, E. Burghardt and
J. Breman, Br. J. Ind. Med., 1971, 28, 96–99; (d) M. H. Noweir
and E. A. Pfitzer, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1971, 32, 163;
(e) L. J. Priestley, Jr., F. E. Critchfield, N. H. Ketcham and
J. D. Cavender, Anal. Chem., 1965, 37, 70; (f) H. B. Singh,
D. Lillian and A. Appleby, Anal. Chem., 1975, 47, 860;
(g) C. R. Thompson, G. H. Farrah, L. V. Haff, A. W. Hook,
J. S. Jacobson, E. J. Schneider and L. H. Weinstein, Health Lab.
Sci., 1976, 13, 71.
4 H. Zhang and D. M. Rudkevich, Chem. Commun., 2007, 1238.
5 (a) S. K. Dangwal, Ind. Health, 1994, 32, 41; (b) D. Feng, Y. Zhang,
W. Shi, X. Li and H. Ma, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 9203;
(c) S. Virj, R. Kojima, J. D. Fowler, J. G. Villanueva,
R. B. Kaner and B. H. Weiller, Nano Res., 2009, 2, 135.
6 (a) Q. A. Best, R. Xu, M. E. McCarroll, L. Wang and D. J. Dyer,
Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 3219; (b) H. N. Kim, M. H. Lee, H. J. Kim,
J. S. Kim and J. Yoon, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 1465; (c) Z. Li,
Z. Xue, Z. Wu, J. Han and S. Han, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011,
9, 7652; (d) X. Wu, Z. Wu and S. Han, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47, 11276.
With the favorable features of dRB-EDA, we further probed
its feasibility for real-time detection of gaseous phosgene in a
portable manner. dRB-EDA was absorbed on paper strips and
silica gel respectively. The testing paper was placed in sealed
chambers where gaseous phosgene was generated in situ from
triphosgene and phenanthridine following a reported procedure.9
The test paper quickly turned into red color upon generation of
gaseous phosgene whereas no color was observed in the control
chambers (Fig. 5). The color change of the strips was clearly
visible in the presence of 0.8 mg LÀ1 of gaseous phosgene, which
is 10-fold more sensitive than the threshold of immediate danger
to health and life limit of gaseous phosgene (ESIw, Fig. S17). In a
separate experiment, the colorless silica gel column containing
dRB-EDA quickly became red in contact with gaseous phosgene
(ESIw, Fig. S18 and S19). These results indicated that visual
detection of gaseous phosgene is applicable with dRB-EDA
formulated with appropriate portable platforms, e.g. paper strips.
7 H. Babad and A. G. Zeiler, Chem. Rev., 1973, 73, 75–91.
8 S. Han, Z. Xue, Z. Wang and T. B. Wen, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46,
8413–8415.
9 H. Eckert and J. Auerweck, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2010, 14, 1501.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 1895–1897 1897