evaluated the extent of selective cytotoxicity for each of the
compounds as well as doxorubicin by dividing the IC50 for the
non-tumorigenic MCF-10A cells by the IC50 values determined
for both breast cancer cell lines (Table 4). Among the chalcones,
5 showed 2.7-fold greater toxicity in MCF-7 cells as compared to
the MCF-10A cells. Otherwise, the chalcones were actually
more cytotoxic in MCF-10A cells than the breast cancer cells.
This finding strengthened our rationale for synthesizing
and sub-micromolar activity in the cancerous cell lines along
with the high SI of derivative 18 make it the most promising
candidate of all the cinnamylideneacetophenones for future
studies and derivation. The next most promising derivative 17
only differs from 18 in that ring A consists of a furan heterocycle
rather than a phenyl group.
In conclusion, the majority of the derivatives bore
substitutions on the A-ring yet the two most active derivatives
bore a 2-nitro group on the B-ring. Both of these agents
exhibited anticancer activity in the nanomolar to sub-micromolar
range yet exhibited substantially less cytotoxicity in the MCF-
10A cells. In fact the selectivity index for both 17 and 18
appears to be superior to that observed with the established
chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin. Studies are underway to
further develop 17 and 18 as agents to treat breast cancer.
Table 3. Cinnamylideneacetophenones 9-18 produced via Scheme 2a
Compound MDA-MB-468
MCF-7
IC50 (M)
>50
MCF-10A
IC50 (M)
>50
number
IC50 (M)
9
31.9 (13.4-75.7)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
6.35 (1.4-10.4) 2.13(0.24-18.4)
1.11(0.47-2.65)
>50
>50
>50
4.28 (0.13-1.4)
>50
>50
>50
>50
Acknowledgments
>50
15.6 (6.7-36.3)
>50
2.7 (0.5-14.6)
>50
1.37 (0.257-7.5)
>50
Research reported in this publication was supported in part by
the National Institute of Health Disparities and Minority Health
of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award
number P20MD006988, the National Cancer Institute of NIH
under award number R01 CA101864-09S1, the Elizabeth City
State University Support Program for Academic and Research
Enhancement (ESPARE) from the National Institute of General
Medical Sciences of NIH award number R25GM082808, Grants
to Promote Collaborative and Translational Research (Loma
Linda University) and from intramural funding from the Loma
Linda University School of Pharmacy Department of
Pharmaceutical and Administrative Sciences. The content is
solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily
represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or
Loma Linda University.
8.429 (4.2-16.9)
>50
>50
0.78 (0.48-1.4) 0.071 (0.027-0.18)
9.11(1.5-56.4)
>50
1.37 (0.74-2.5) 0.0019 (0.0005-
0.0076)
doxorubicin 0.1 (0.015-0.67) 0.18 (0.06-0.53) 0.037 (0.026-0.54)
aAll tests were performed in replicate (n = 5). Numbers in parentheses
represent 95% confidence intervals.
derivatives with extended conjugation as opposed to additional
chalcones. We detected a greater than 11-fold selectivity for
MCF-7 cells following exposure to 12. We found nearly 6-fold
selectivity of 16 for MDA-MB-468 cells. Thus, fluorine
substitution on the phenyl group (ring A) and insertion of a
phenyl group for a naphthyl group in ring A led to derivatives
with promising activity and selectivity for MCF-7 and MDA-
MB-468 cells respectively.
References and notes
1.
Desantis, C.; Ma, J.; Bryan, L.; Jemal, A. CA: Cancer J.
Clin. 2014, 64, 52.
The selectivity indices for 17 in MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7
cells were 10- and 128-fold respectively. The greatest extent of
selective cytotoxicity was found when MDA-MB-468 and MCF-
7 cells were exposed to 18; a derivative that is more than 35
times more selective for MDA-MB-468 cells and more than
25,000 times more selective for MCF-7 cells. The micromolar
2.
Zhou, L.; Yan, T.; Jiang, Y.; Di, G.; Shen, Z.; Shao, Z.;
Lu, J. Breast. 2011, 20, 15.
3.
S.; Yde, C. W. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013, 139, 71.
4.
Anticancer Ther. 2013, 13, 143.
5.
Am. 2013, 27, 715.
6.
Thrane, S.; Lykkesfeldt, A. E.; Larsen, M. S.; Sorensen, B.
Provenzano, A.; Kurian, S.; Abraham, J. Expert Rev
Schiavon, G.; Smith, I. E. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North
Table 4. Selectivity Index (SI)b for doxorubicin, chalcones and
cinnamylideneacetophenones
Magne, N.; Chargari, C.; MacDermed, D.; Conforti, R.;
Vedrine, L.; Spano, J. P.; Khayat, D. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.
2010, 76, 186.
Compound
number
4
MDA-MB-468
MCF-7
SI
0.004
SI
0.016
7.
Sandhu, H.; Maddock, H. Clin. Sci. 2014, 126, 377.
8.
Bassett, S.; Urrabaz, R.; Sun, D. Anticancer Drugs. 2004,
5
<0.20
<0.096
>1.6
2.7
<0.063
N/A
15, 689.
9.
6
Kanda, Y.; Ashizawa, T.; Kawashima, K.; Ikeda, S.;
Tamaoki, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 455.
10. Chatterji, T.; Keerthi, K.; Gates, K. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2005, 15, 3921.
9
10
0.17
0.17
11.
Bandgar, B. P.; Gawande, S. S.; Bodade, R. G.; Totre, J.
11
N/A
N/A
V.; Khobragade, C. N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 1364.
12.
Cruz-Lopez, O.; Preti, D.; Tolomeo, M.; Grimaudo, S.; Di Cristina,
A.; Zonta, N.; Balzarini, J.; Brancale, A.; Sarkar, T.; Hamel, E.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 5367.
12
N/A
>11.9
N/A
Romagnoli, R.; Baraldi, P. G.; Carrion, M. D.; Cara, C. L.;
13
N/A
14
0.088
N/A
0.5
15
N/A
13.
Kim, S. Y.; Lee, I. S.; Moon, A. Chem. Biol. Interact.
2013, 203, 565.
16
17
>5.95
10.24
>36.50
0.37
N/A
14.
Shih, C. H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; Chu, I. K.; Lo, C. J.
128.3
>26,316
0.21
Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 5655.
18
doxorubicin
bSI = IC50 for MCF-10A cells/IC50 for cancer cells
N/A = not available