REPORTS
Fig. 3. Proposed mechanism for
ruthenium-catalyzed hydrohydroxy-
alkylation of butadiene, illustrating
the counterion-dependent partition-
ing of (E)- and (Z)-s-crotylruthenium
isomers.
32. K. Hiraki, N. Ochi, Y. Sasada, H. Hayashida, Y. Fuchita,
S. J. Yamanaka, Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1985, 873 (1985).
33. P. Xue et al., Organometallics 23, 4735 (2004).
References and Notes
Supplementary Materials
1. M. Butters et al., Chem. Rev. 106, 3002 (2006).
2. R. A. Sheldon, E. The, Green Chem. 9, 1273 (2007).
3. C. A. Busacca, D. R. Fandrick, J. J. Song, C. H. Senanayake,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 353, 1825 (2011).
Materials and Methods
Tables S1 to S4
References (34–42)
Acknowledgments: The Robert A. Welch Foundation
(grant F-0038) and the NIH’s National Institute of General
Medical Sciences (grant RO1-GM069445) are acknowledged
for financial support.
4. J. Magano, J. R. Dunetz, Chem. Rev. 111, 2177 (2011).
5. C. D. Frohning, C. W. Kohlpaintner, in Applied Homogeneous
Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds, B. Cornils,
W. A. Herrmann, Eds. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany
1996), pp. 29–104.
17 January 2012; accepted 8 March 2012
10.1126/science.1219274
6. P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, in Homogeneous Catalysis:
Understanding the Art (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands,
2004), pp. 139–174.
7. J. F. Bower, M. J. Krische, Top. Organomet. Chem. 34,
107 (2011).
8. A. Hassan, M. J. Krische, Org. Process Res. Dev. 15, 1236 (2011).
9. I. S. Kim, S. B. Han, M. J. Krische, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131,
2514 (2009).
10. X. Gao, I. A. Townsend, M. J. Krische, J. Org. Chem. 76,
2350 (2011).
11. X. Gao, H. Han, M. J. Krische, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133,
12795 (2011).
12. J. R. Zbieg, T. Fukuzumi, M. J. Krische, Adv. Synth. Catal.
352, 2416 (2010).
A Universal Method to Produce
Low–Work Function Electrodes
for Organic Electronics
Yinhua Zhou,1 Canek Fuentes-Hernandez,1 Jaewon Shim,1 Jens Meyer,2 Anthony J. Giordano,3
Hong Li,3 Paul Winget,3 Theodoros Papadopoulos,3 Hyeunseok Cheun,1 Jungbae Kim,1
Mathieu Fenoll,1,4 Amir Dindar,1 Wojciech Haske,1 Ehsan Najafabadi,1 Talha M. Khan,1
Hossein Sojoudi,5 Stephen Barlow,3 Samuel Graham,5 Jean-Luc Brédas,3 Seth R. Marder,3
Antoine Kahn,2 Bernard Kippelen1*
13. F. Shibahara, J. F. Bower, M. J. Krische, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
130, 6338 (2008).
14. J. R. Zbieg, J. Moran, M. J. Krische, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
133, 10582 (2011).
15. H. Alper, N. Hamel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 2803 (1990).
16. V. Komanduri, M. J. Krische, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128,
16448 (2006).
Organic and printed electronics technologies require conductors with a work function that is
sufficiently low to facilitate the transport of electrons in and out of various optoelectronic devices.
We show that surface modifiers based on polymers containing simple aliphatic amine groups
substantially reduce the work function of conductors including metals, transparent conductive metal
oxides, conducting polymers, and graphene. The reduction arises from physisorption of the neutral
polymer, which turns the modified conductors into efficient electron-selective electrodes in organic
optoelectronic devices. These polymer surface modifiers are processed in air from solution,
providing an appealing alternative to chemically reactive low–work function metals. Their use can
pave the way to simplified manufacturing of low-cost and large-area organic electronic technologies.
17. G. L. Hamilton, E. J. Kang, M. Mba, F. D. Toste, Science
317, 496 (2007).
18. M. Rueping, A. P. Antonchick, C. Brinkmann, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 6903 (2007).
19. S. Mukherjee, B. List, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 11336
(2007).
20. S. Liao, B. List, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 628 (2010).
21. G. Jiang, B. List, Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 47, 10022
(2011).
22. B. Xu, S.-F. Zhu, X.-L. Xie, J.-J. Shen, Q.-L. Zhou,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 11483 (2011).
23. S. E. Denmark, J. Fu, Chem. Rev. 103, 2763 (2003).
24. M. Yus, J. C. González-Gómez, F. Foubelo, Chem. Rev.
111, 7774 (2011).
25. R. W. Hoffmann, W. Ladner, Tetrahedron Lett. 20, 4653
(1979).
26. H. C. Brown, K. S. Bhat, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 293
(1986).
rganic-based thin-film optoelectronic de- elements (Li, Cs), meet this requirement; how-
vices, such as organic solar cells (OSCs), ever, they are chemically very reactive and easily
O
organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), oxidize in the presence of ambient oxygen and
and organic thin-film transistors (TFTs), hold great
economic potential; they may lead to a new gen-
eration of consumer electronic devices that could 1Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics (COPE), School
of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of
be printed or processed at low cost on large areas,
have very low weight, and conform to free-form
Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. 2Department of Elec-
trical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544,
27. H. C. Brown, K. S. Bhat, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 5919
(1986).
28. H. Kim, S. Ho, J. L. Leighton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133,
6517 (2011).
USA. 3Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics (COPE),
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of
Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. 4Solvay SA, rue de
Ransbeek 310, 1120 Brussels, Belgium. 5Center for Organic
Photonics and Electronics (COPE), George W. Woodruff School
of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
and flexible substrates (1–4). However, most
printed optoelectronic devices require at least one
electrode with a work function (WF) that is suf-
ficiently low to either inject electrons into or collect
electrons from the lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital (LUMO) of a given organic semiconductor.
Low-WF metals, such as alkaline-earth metals (Ca,
29. A. Dobson, S. R. Robinson, M. F. Uttley, J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 1975, 370 (1975).
30. J. R. Zbieg, E. L. McInturff, J. C. Leung, M. J. Krische,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1141 (2011).
31. H. C. Maytum, B. Tavassoli, J. M. J. Williams, Org. Lett. 9,
4387 (2007).
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
327