R. Subashini et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 95 (2012) 442–445
445
High Resonance Mass Spectrometry. The calculated mass is
396.1029 but the actual mass that we have observed through HRMS
is 396.1028. The fragmentation is as follows 396.1028 (37%),
302.2106 (13%), 351.0925 (13), 292.9968 (25%), 229.0848 (40%),
209.0697 (100%), 79.1620 (55%), 190.0011 (15%), 135.1195 (20%).
of mosquito population by using compounds 3 and 5. This is an
ideal eco-friendly approach for the control of filariasis vector, C.
quinquefasciatus and Japanese encephalitis vector, C. gelidus.
Acknowledgements
Mosquito larvicidal activity of compounds 3 and 5
The authors are grateful to VIT University, Vellore and C. Abdul
Hakeem College, Melvisharam management for providing the
necessary research facility and their support.
In the present study, mosquito’s larvae were exposed to varying
concentrations of synthesized compounds 3 and 5 for 24 h. The
larval percent mortality observed in green synthesis of synthetic
compound 3 was 07, 16, 31, 44 and 62; 04, 14, 26, 38 and 59 at
50 mg/L against C. quinquefasciatus and C. gelidus respectively. Values
of the efficacy of compound 3 were against C. quinquefasciatus
(LC50 = 42.78 mg/L; r2 = 0.989) and C. gelidus (LC50 = 45.44 mg/L;
r2 = 0.978). The larval percent mortality observed in green synthe-
sis of synthetic compound 5 was 17, 34, 52, 83 and 100; 20, 31, 56,
79 and 100 at 50 mg/L against C. quinquefasciatus and C. gelidus,
respectively. The maximum efficacy was observed in compound
5 against the larvae of C. quinquefasciatus (LC50 = 25.02 mg/L;
r2 = 0.998) and C. gelidus (LC50 = 26.40 mg/L; r2 = 0.988), respec-
tively. In the present study, the larvicidal activity results showed
the highest mortality in compound 5 than 3. The control (distilled
water) showed nil mortality in the concurrent assay. The chi-
square value was significant at p 6 0.05 level. The complete
mortality was observed for compounds 3 and 5 for larvae of
C. quinquefasciatus and C. gelidus at 50 mg/L (Table 1).
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] H. Cetin, F. Erler, A. Yanikoglu, Fitoterapia 75 (2004) 724–728.
[2] L. Bernhard, P. Bernhard, P. Magnussen, Physiotherapy 89 (2003) 743–749.
[3] T.N. Solomon, Engl. J. Med. 351 (2004) 370–378.
[4] Y. Rongsriyam, Y. Trongtokit, N. Komalamisra, N. Sinchaipanich, C.
Apiwathnasorn, A. Mitrejet, Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 37
(2006) 265–271.
[5] K. Karunamoorthi, S. Ramanujam, R. Rathinasamy, Parasitol. Res. 103 (2008)
545–550.
[6] B.L. Innis, Japanese encephalitis, in: J.S. Potterfield (Ed.), Exotic Viral Infections,
Chapman and Hall, London, 1995, pp. 147–174.
[7] V. Saxena, T.N. Dhole, J. Biosci. 33 (2008) 505–514.
[8] V. Ravi, S. Vanajakshi, A. Gowda, A. Chandramuki, J. Med. Virol. 29 (1989)
221–223.
[9] J. Hemingway, N.J. Hawkes, L. McCarroll, H. Ranson, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.
34 (2004) 653–665.
[10] S.K. Bansal, K.V. Singh, Indian J. Med. Res. 101 (1995) 190–192.
[11] M. Watanabe, S. Takebe, K. Kobashi, Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 39 (1991)
980–985.
[12] D.J. Shetlar, Aphids on trees and shrubs, HYG-2031-90. Ohio State University
Extension Fact sheet, Department of Horticul-ture and Crop Science, Ohio State
University, USA, 2001.
Discussion
Spectral data of compounds 3 and 5
The 1H NMR spectra of compound 3 show three peaks in ali-
phatic region such as three doublet at d 2.72, 3.38 and one quartet
at d 2.24–2.31 corresponding to three –CH2 protons. When we are
comparing the 1H NMR spectra of compound 3 with compound 5
there is a difference in the aliphatic range that is, disappearance
of C2 proton (–CH2) which is the evidence for the formation of com-
pound 5. Further it was supported by 13C NMR and HRMS.
[13] Z. Han, F. Li, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34 (2004) 397–405.
[14] S.M. Roopan, F.N. Khan, Med. Chem. Res. 20 (2011) 732–737.
[15] B.F. Cain, G.J. Atwell, W.A. Denny, J. Med. Chem. 18 (1975) 1110–1116.
[16] G.J. Finlay, J.F. Riou, B.C. Baguley, Eur. J. Cancer 32 (1996) 708–714.
[17] W.D. Inman, M.O. Neill-Johnson, P.J. Crews, Am. Chem. Soc. 112 (1990) 1–4.
[18] G.P. Gunawardana, S. Kohmoto, S.P. Gunasekara, O.J. McConnell, F.E. Koehn, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988) 4856–4858.
[19] B.P. Bandgar, S.S. Gawande, R.G. Bodade, J.V. Totre, C.N. Khobragade, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 18 (2010) 1364–1370.
[20] S. Sebti, A. Solhy, A. Smahi, A. Kossir, H. Oumimoun, Catal. Commun. 3 (2002)
335–339.
Larvicidal studies of compounds 3 and 5
[21] S.M. Roopan, T. Maiyalagan, F.N. Khan, Can. J. Chem. 86 (2008) 1019–1025.
[22] B. Krishnakumar, R. Velmurugan, M. Swaminathan, Catal. Commun. 12 (2011)
375–379.
[23] S.M. Roopan, T.R. Sakthi Sri, B. Ramakrishna Reddy, F.N. Khan, Indian J.
Heterocycl. Chem. 19 (2009) 77–78.
[24] R. Subashini, F.N. Khan, Monatsh. Chem. 143 (2012) 483–485.
[25] C. Kamaraj, A. Bagavan, A.A. Rahuman, A.A. Zahir, G. Elango, G. Pandiyan,
Parasitol. Res. 104 (2009) 1163–1171.
[26] P.J. Reddy, D. Krishna, U.S. Murthy, K. Jamil, Com-put Appl. Biosci. 8 (1992)
209–213.
All the compounds 3 and 5 were screened for the efficacy of lar-
vicidal and repellent activity against the early fourth instar larvae
of filariasis vector (C. quinquefasciatus) and Japans encephalitis vec-
tor (C. gelidus) at 10–50 mg/mL. The compounds exhibited high lar-
vicidal effects at 50 mg/L against both the mosquitoes with LC50
values of 25.02 mg/L (r2 = 0.998) and 26.40 mg/L (r2 = 0.998)
against C. quinquefasciatus and C. gelidus respectively. To our best
of knowledge there is no report in the literature for the control