J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem (2012) 74:391–396
393
Accessary). UV–Vis spectra were obtained by Shimadzu UV–
1,700 visible recording spectrophotometers. Melting points
were determined using an electrothermal apparatus and were
uncorrected. The mass analyzer was a Bruker Daltonics (Bre-
men, Germany) MicrOTOF mass spectrometer equipped with
an orthogonal electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The
instrument was operated in negative ion mode using a m/z
range of 50–1,500. Magnetic susceptibilities were determined
on a Sherwood Scientific Magnetic Susceptibility balance
(Model MK1) at room temperature using Hg[Co(SCN)4] as a
standard; diamagnetic corrections were calculated from Pas-
cal’s constants. All the electrochemical experiments were
performed using a CH Instruments electrochemical analyzer
(model 600C series) equipped with BAS C3 cell stand.
Working electrode was a bare glassy carbon (GC) disk (BAS
Model MF-2012) with a geometric area of 0.027 cm2. The
reference electrode was Ag/Ag/Ag? (0.01 M AgNO3) in
nonaqueous media, and the counter electrode was a Pt wire.
hot ethanol, was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 3
(0.1 mmol, 67.5 mg) in 5 mL of ethanol. A distinct change in
color and a decrease in the pH of the solution was observed.
Whilestirringatthesametemperature,NaOH(1%)wasadded
in order to increase the pH. The mixture was stirred on a water
bathat50 ꢁCfor30 mininordertocompletetheprecipitation.
The precipitates were then filtered and washed with water,
ethanol and ether and dried in vacuo.
Data for (4). Elemental analysis (Found: C, 69.92; H,
7.28; N, 13.87%. Calc.: C, 69.98; H, 7.39; N, 13.94%). IR
m
max/cm-1: 3,435 (N–H), 2,875–2,964 (C–Haliph), 1,709
1
(O–HꢀꢀꢀO), 1,574 (C=N), 986 (N–O). H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6, ppm): 0.29–0.58 (m, 36 H, CH3), 1.55–1.79
(m, 24 H CH2), 2.12 (s, 6H, CH3), 5.52–5.63 (br m, 16 H,
pyr-CH), 6.30 (s, 2H, N–H), 6.47–7.06 (br m, 8 H, Ar-
CH), 8.81 (br s, 4 H, NHpyr), 9.31 (br s, 4 H, NHpyr), 9.39
(s, 2H, CH), 14.42 (s, 2H, O–HꢀꢀꢀO, D2O-exchangeable).
MS(ES) for C82H104N14O4Ni m/z: 1406.47 [M]?, leff:
diamagnetic.
Synthesis
Data for (5). Elemental analysis (Found: C, 69.77; H,
7.32; N, 13.87%. Calc.: C, 69.73; H, 7.37; N, 13.89%). IR
m
max/cm-1: 3,431 (N–H), 2,849–2,963 (C–Haliph), 1,716
Synthesis of the ligand [LH2] (3)
(O–HꢀꢀꢀO), 1,572 (C=N), 982 (N–O), leff : 1.45.
A mixture of amino-modified calixpyrrole (2) (0.1 mmol,
59 mg), anti-chloroglyoxime (0.1 mmol, 12 mg), Et2O
(15 mL) and Et3N (0.1 mL) was stirred overnight at room
temperature. Then the solution was washed three times with
saturated NaHCO3 (3 9 15 mL) solution. The organic phase
was collected, and dried with Na2SO4 and the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure. The product was purified by
columnchromatography(MeOH/CHCl3, 5/95). Thesynthesis
of the ligand repeated several times in order to gather enough
material for the complex synthesis. Elemental analysis
(Found: C, 72.78; H, 7.78; N, 14.44%. Calc.: C, 72.89; H,
7.85; N, 14.52%). IR mmax/cm-1: 3,410 (N–H), 3,335 (O–H),
2,876–2,965 (C–Haliph), 1,587 (C=N), 998 (N–O). 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): 0.46–0.68 (m, 18 H, CH3),
1.73–1.90 (m, 15 H CH2?CH3), 5.66–5.77 (br m, 8 H, pyr-
CH), 6.30–7.09 (br m, 4 H, Ar-CH), 7.39 (s, 1H CH), 7.54 (br
s, 1H, NH), 8.97 (br s, 2H,NH), 9.43 (br s, 2H, NH), 10.82 (s,
1H, N–OH, D2O-exchangeable), 11.32 (s, 1H, N–OH, D2O-
exchangeable). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6, ppm): 8.26,
8.38, 8.74, 8.89, 8.93, 9.35, 9.42, 28.30, 28.90, 29.20, 29.70,
30.66, 31.79, 42.59, 43.20, 43.38, 44.67, 103.11, 105.05,
105.19, 105.18, 112.13, 113.71, 115.54, 127.92, 128.96,
129.10, 130.42, 135.92, 136.75, 138.23, 145.81, 148.88. MS
(ES) for C41H53N7O2 m/z: 675.43 [M]?, 674.43 [M-H]?.
Data for (6). Elemental analysis (Found: C, 68.26; H, 7.52;
N, 13.61%. Calc.: C, 68.23; H, 7.49; N, 13.59%). IR mmax
/
cm-1: 3,431 (N–H), 3,360 (O–H), 2,849–2,963 (C–Haliph),
1,704 (O–HꢀꢀꢀO), 1,578 (C=N), 982 (N–O), leff: 2.39.
Results and discussion
In the IR spectrum of the vic-dioxime ligand, the –OH and
–NH stretching vibrations were observed as a broad band at
3,335 and 3,410 cm-1, respectively. The very strong
absorption band at 1,587 cm-1 due to v(C=N) of azome-
thine group in the structure of the ligand was observed. The
spectrum of the ligand also shows absorption bands in the
1,416–1,490 cm-1 region which are assigned to the aro-
matic ring stretching vibrations. In the IR spectrum of the
complexes, strong v(NH), v(C=N) and v(NO) characteristic
stretching vibration bands were observed at 3,435, 1,574
and 986 cm-1 for complex 4; at 3,431, 1,572 and 982 for
complex 5; 3,431, 1,578 and 982 for complex 6. In the IR
spectrum of the Co(II) complex (6), coordinated H2O
molecules were identified by a strong broad OH absorption
around 3,360 cm-1 [15]. In the IR spectra of the com-
plexes, displacements of the absorption bands to lower
frequencies compared to the free ligand were observed,
indicating the coordination of the ligand to the metal ion.
For example, the IR spectra of the complexes shows that
the v(C=N) band is shifted to lower frequencies, compared
to that of the free ligand at 1,587 cm-1 [15, 16]. The oxime
hydroxyl stretching of the free ligand is not observed, while
Synthesis of mononuclear complexes, [Ni(LH)2] (4),
[Cu(LH)2] (5), [Co(LH)2.(H2O)2] (6)
A solution of 0.05 mmol metal salt [NiCI2ꢀ6H2O (0.0118 g),
CuCl2ꢀ2H2O (0.0084 g) CoCl2ꢀ6H2O (0.0116 g)] in 5 mL of
123