intermediateled toa mixture of the expected monoarylated
product 3a in combination with the diarylated product 4a
(as a 3a:4a 30:70 ratio) in a promising global yield of 47%
(entry 2). This result showed that the second cross-coupling
reaction proceeds faster than the first one. It is noticeable
that this diarylated framework is the key scaffold of some
bioactive substances such as the β-carboline alkaloids
tadalafil or quillifoline (Figure 1). As the choice of solvent
is known to control the decarboxylation rate,4b,7b,7f,16c our
next attempt was to use TMSO in place of DMSO (entry 3)
asa cosolvent;anincreasein the yield of product 3ato21%
and 4a to 51% was thus observed.
Figure 1. Representative examples of 2-aryl- or 2,4-diaryl-
piperidines.
Enamides are stable enamine surrogates and are im-
portant key intermediates for the synthesis of small but
complex nitrogen containing compounds; recently, they
have been involved in several metal catalyzed reactions.8
Among these reactions, direct C3 dehydrogenative func-
tionalization of nonaromatic enamides was recently de-
scribed with alkenes9 or arenes10 and direct C2 function-
alization was extensively reported by Xiao’s team starting
from aryl chlorides11 and Park with pinacol arylboronates.12
Recently, we have been engaged in the development of a
regioselective oxidative CꢀH bond functionalization pro-
gram starting from nonaromatic enamides.9,13 In pursuit
of this goal, we wish herein to report our results in this area
involving the decarboxylative cross-coupling reaction of
aryl carboxylic acids, for the synthesis of arylated nitrogen
containing frameworks. We expect this new method to be
broadly applicable to the synthesis of natural products and
medicinal agents (Figure 1).14
Guided by recent advances in this area, our representa-
tive attempts are summarized in Table 1. We first selected
the simple cyclic enamide 1a and 2,6-dimethoxybenzoic
acid as a coupling partner, in the presence of Ag2CO3, a
catalytic amount of Pd(OAc)2, PPh3 asa phosphine ligand,
and DMSO as a cosolvent in DMF at 80 °C for 24 h
(Table 1, entry 1). By applying these conditions at the
outset of our study, only a trace amount of the attempted
product was identified. Surprisingly, adding propionic
acid to enhance the electrophilic ability of the palladium
Table 1. Optimization of Direct Mono- or Diarylation onto
Enamide 1aa
yield yield
2a
3a
4a
entry (equiv)
catalyst
Pd(OAc)2
cosolvent additive (%)b (%)b
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
1
5
5
DMSO none
trace trace
2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(TFA)2
DMSO EtCO2H 14
TMSO EtCO2H 21
33
51
34
3
4
TMSO none
19
5
TMSO tBuCO2H trace trace
6c
7d
8
TMSO EtCO2H
TMSO EtCO2H
0
0
0
0
TMSO EtCO2H trace 65
TMSO EtCO2H trace trace
TMSO EtCO2H trace 26
9e
10
11
Pd(MeCN)2Cl2 TMSO EtCO2H trace trace
a Reaction conditions unless otherwise specified: 1a (1 equiv), 2a,
Ag2CO3 (2 equiv), Pd(II) catalyst (10 mol %), PPh3 (0.5 equiv),
cosolvent (2.4 equiv), additive (0.5 equiv) in DMF at 80 °C for 24 h.
b Yield of pure product after purification by column chromatography.
c The reaction was conducted without PPh3. d The reaction was carried
out in a sealed tube. e Ag2CO3 (1 equiv) was used.
(8) (a) Gopalaiah, K.; Kagan, H. B. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 4599–
4657. (b) Matsubara, R.; Kobayashi, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 292–
301. (c) Carbery, D. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 3455–3460.
(9) (a) Gigant, N.; Gillaizeau, I. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3304–3307. (b)
Xu, Y.-H.; Chok, Y. K.; Loh, T.-K. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1822–1825.
(10) Pankajakshan, S.; Xu, Y.-H.; Cheng, J. K.; Low, M. T.; Loh,
T.-P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5701–5705.
(11) (a) Ruan, J.; Iggo, J. A.; Berry, N. G.; Xiao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 16689–16699. (b) Hyder, Z.; Ruan, J.; Xiao, J. Chem.;Eur. J.
2008, 14, 5555–5566. (c) Mo, J.; Xiao, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
4152–4157. (d) Mo, J.; Xu, L.; Xiao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 751–
760.
(12) Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Park, C.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
7333–7336.
(13) (a) Gigant, N.; Gillaizeau, I. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4622–4625. (b)
Gigant, N.; Claveau, E.; Bouyssou, P.; Gillaizeau, I. Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
844–847. (c) Gigant, N.; Dequirez, G.; Retailleau, P.; Gillaizeau, I.;
Dauban, P. Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 90–94.
Modifications of both the additive and of the phosphine
ligand were unsuccessful (entries 4ꢀ6). The low yields
observed in these cases resulted from a degradation reac-
tion in addition to the formation of side products arising
from degradation and/or homocoupling.15 Degradation
also occurred when the process was carried out under
pressure (entry 7). With selective transformations noted
as a key challenge in organic chemistry, in order to favor
the formation of diarylated scaffolds 4a, the amount of
carboxylic acid was increased. The use of 5 equiv of 2a
led gratifyingly to the corresponding piperidine core 4a,
(14) (a) Seabrook, G. R.; Shepheard, S. L.; Williamson, D. J.; Tyrer,
P.; Rigby, M.; Cascieri, M. A.; Harrison, T.; Hargreaves, R. J.; Hill,
R. G. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1996, 317, 129–135. (b) Pansare, S. V.; Paul,
E. K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 2119–2125.
(15) Hu, P.; Shang, Y.; Su, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5945–
5949.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 4, 2013
817