Grignard reagents could be used to prepare analogues of
the natural product.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Bicyclic Lactone 7
Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis of Blepharocalyxin D
The second approach to 7 involved the direct reaction of
γ,δ-unsaturated alcohol 5 with commercially available
methyl 3,3-dimethoxypropanoate 8 giving, after optimiza-
tion, lactone 7 in 67% yield. These studies established an
approach for the direct conversion of γ,δ-unsaturated
alcohols to trans fused bicyclic lactones with equatorial
groups at both C-3 and C-7.
For the proposed synthesis of blepharocalyxin D
(Scheme 2), a γ,δ-unsaturated dienol 3 was required as
the substrate for the key cyclization to generate the bicyclic
framework with an equatorial styrenyl group at C-5.
Following the studies outlined in Scheme 2, we selected
dienol 16 with phenyl groups as the initial target.
Dienol 16 was prepared from the known9 (S)-homoallylic
alcohol 9 as shown in Scheme 3. Following protection of the
secondary alcohol as TBS ether 10, the double bond was
oxidatively cleaved with OsO4/NaIO4 to give aldehyde 11. A
HornerꢀWadsworthꢀEmmons chain extension of 11 using
phosphonate 12 and K2CO3 gave (E)-R,β-unsaturated
ketone 13 with excellent stereocontrol. The final carbonꢀ
carbon bond was formed via a rhodium-mediated 1,4-
addition of styrenyl boronic acid to enone 13 under the
conditions reported by Hiyashi10 to give ketone 14 in 94%
yield as a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers. The lack of stereo-
control was not a problem as this newly created stereocenter
would be destroyed later in the synthesis as the target, dienol
16, has two identical (E)-phenylethenyl side chains.
We envisaged that the second double bond of 15 could
be readily generated from ketone 14 via reduction to an
alcohol followed byelimination. While reduction ofketone
14 with NaBH4 proceeded smoothly to give the expected
benzylic alcohol as a mixture of isomers, the elimination
step proved problematic via either the corresponding
acetate or mesylate. However, the rarely used xanthate
formation/Chugaev elimination in this instance worked
well. Thus, conversion of the alcohol to a xanthate using
NaH/CS2/MeI followed by refluxing with NaHCO3 in
The trans-2,8-dioxabicyclo[4.4.0]decanone (2) would be
assembled from γ,δ-unsaturated alcohol 3 in which the
double bond is placed one position further away from the
hydroxyl group than in homoallylic alcohols and deriva-
tives commonly used in Prins cyclizations.5 The success of
this strategy relied upon reaction of 3 (to be prepared from
(S)-homoallylic alcohol 4) with an electrophile to generate
an intermediate oxycarbenium I with diastereotopic styr-
enyl groups. Cyclization was predicted to proceed to give
stabilized carbocation II with the first of the oxane rings
with an equatorial substituent at C-5. Intramolecular
trapping of the resultant carbocation with an ester would
generate the second heterocycle giving lactone 2 with an
equatorial substituent at C-7.6
To establish conditions for the proposed cyclization,
first the known7 γ,δ-unsaturated alcohol 5 was converted
to enol ether 6 using methyl propiolate and catalytic
quinuclidine. Treatment of 6 with TMSOTf gave bicyclic
lactone 7 in 69% yield (Scheme 2).8 The structure was
elucidated by NMR spectroscopy and confirmed by X-ray
crystallography.
(5) For reviews on Prins cyclizations, see: (a) Olier, C.; Kaafarani,
M.; Gastaldi, S.; Bertrand, M. P. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 413. (b) Crane,
E. A.; Scheidt, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8316.
(6) For examples of the use of intramolecular trapping using tethered
ꢀ
oxygen nucleophiles, see: (a) Frater, G.; Muller, U.; Kraft, P. Helv.
Chim. Acta 2004, 87, 2750. (b) Elsworth, J. D.; Willis, C. L. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 13, 1587. (c) Yadav, J. S.; Chakravarthy, P. P.; Borkar,
P.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Sarma, A. V. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 5998.
(d) Reddy, B. V. S.; Borkar, P.; Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, P. P.; Kunwar,
(9) Keck, G. E.; Krishnamurthy, D. Org. Synth. 1998, 75, 12.
(10) Takaya, Y.; Ogasawara, M.; Hayashi, T.; Sakai, M.; Miyaura,
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5579.
(11) Chugaev, L. Chem. Ber. 1899, 32, 3332. For selected examples of
the Chugaev elimination in synthesis, see: (a) Meulemans, T. M.; Stork,
G. A.; Macaev, F. Z.; Jansen, B. J. M.; deGroot, A. J. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 91178. (b) Padwa, A.; Zhang, H. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2570.
(c) Nicolaou, K. C.; Ortiz, A.; Zhang, H.; Dagneau, P.; Lanver, A.;
Jennings, M. P.; Arseniyadis, S.; Faraoni, R.; Lizos, D. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 7149.
ꢀ
A. C.; Sridhar, B.; Gree, R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 1349.
(e) Reddy, B. V. S.; Jalal, S.; Borkar, P.; Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, P. P.;
Kunwar, A. C.; Sridhar, B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 6562.
(7) Bunt, A. J.; Bailey, C. D.; Cons, B. D.; Edwards, S. J.; Elsworth,
J. D.; Pheko, T.; Willis, C. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3901.
(8) Previous examples of Prins reactions using enol ethers include:
(a) Hart, D. J.; Bennett, C. E. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1499. (b) Barry, C. S.;
Bushby, N.; Harding, J. R.; Willis, C. L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2683.
(c) Yang, Y.; Jia, P.; Liu, S.; Yu, W. Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 1439.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 8, 2013
2047