Table 2. Optimization for the One-Pot Synthesis of
Spirooxindole 5aa
Scheme 1. Substrate Scope of One-Pot Sequential Reaction
between 1 and 2aa
temp time yieldb
(°C) (h) (%)
exo/endo
eed
(%)
entry
additive
none
(5a/5a0)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
rt
rt
60
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
24
24
12
24
24
24
8
NR
PhCO2H (10%)
PhCO2H (20%)
p-TsOH (10%)
DPP (10%)
tracec
22
3:1
95
95
32
3.5:1
tracec
36
BF3 OEt2 (10%)
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
>20:1
1:3.5
95
95
95
95
95
3
BF3 OEt2 (20%)
53
3
BF3 OEt2 (40%)
8
46
3
3
3
9e BF3 OEt2 (20%) rt
8
64
10 BF3 OEt2 (20%)
60
1
50
a Unless otherwise noted, reactions were performed with 1a
(0.1 mmol) and 2a (1.2 equiv) in the presence of 10 mol % of catalyst
3 in 2 mL of toluene. b Isolated yields. c Determined by 1H NMR with
crude products. d Determined by chiral HPLC analysis for major isomer.
e 1a (1.2 equiv) and 2a (0.1 mmol) was carried out under standard
conditions. DPP = diphenyl phosphate.
alkaloid catalyst 3b and Takemoto catalyst 3c,d6 were also
tested; however, poor enantioselectivities were obtained
(entries 5ꢀ7). Other Cinchona alkaloids such as quinidine
(3e) and quinidine derivatives (3fꢀj) were also investi-
gated.7 Catalysts 3eꢀg gave products in good yields,
though no improvement was achieved for the enantio-
selectivities (entries 8ꢀ10). Benzyl-substituted catalysts 3h
and 3i gave 75% and 83% ee, respectively (entries 11
and 12). To our delight, the bulky 9-anthracenmethoxy-
substituted catalyst 3j gave excellent enantioselectivity
(95% ee) (entry 13).8 Thiourea phenol catalyst 3k was also
(5) For selective examples of Mannich type reactions using Cinchona
alkaloid thiourea catalysts, see: (a) Song, J.; Wang, Y.; Deng, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6048–6049. (b) Song, J.; Shih, H. ꢀW.; Deng, L.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 603–606. (c) Bai, S.; Liang, X.; Song, B.; Bhadury,
P. S.; Hu, D.; Yang, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2011, 22, 518–523. (d)
Nakamura, S.; Maeno, Y.; Ohara, M.; Yamaura, A.; Funahashi, Y.;
Shibata, N. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2960–2963.
(6) For selective examples of Mannich type reactions using takemoto
derivatives catalysts, see: (a) Yamaoka, Y.; Miyabe, H.; Yasui, Y.;
Takemoto, Y. Synthesis 2007, 16, 2571–2575. (b) Lee, J. H.; Kim, Y.
a Reactions condtions: 1 (1.2 equiv) and 2 (0.1 mmol) in toluene
(2 mL), method A or method B. The exo/endo ratio of all products is
>20:1. The isolated yields were given after column chromatography.
The ee’s were determined by chiral HPLC analysis. The absolute
configuration was determined by X-ray analysis of product 5g (see the
Supporting Information), and the others were assigned accordingly.
examined, but the ee was relatively low (ꢀ51% ee)
(entry 14).9 Lower catalyst loading (5 mol %) did not
affect the yield or ee of product (entry 15).
€
ꢁ
Synthesis 2010, 11, 1860–1864. (c) Enders, D.; Goddertz, D. P.; Beceno,
C.; Raabe, G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2863–2868. (d) Zhao, D.;
Yang, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Mao, L.; Wang, R. Chem. Sci.
2011, 2, 1918–1921.
(7) For selective examples of Mannich type reactions using quinidine
derivatives catalysts, see: (a) Shi, Z.; Yu, P.; Chua, P. J.; Zhong, G. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2797–2800. (b) Li, L.; Ganesh, M.; Seidel, D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11648–11649. (c) Cheng, L.; Liu, L.; Jia, H.;
Wang, D.; Chen, Y.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4650–4653. (d) Liu, X.;
Deng, L.; Jiang, X.; Yan, W.; Liu, C.; Wang, R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 876–
879. (e) Liu, X.; Deng, L.; Song, H.; Jia, H.; Wang, R. Org. Lett. 2011,
13, 1494–1497.
(8) Albertshofer, K.; Tan, B.; Barbas, C. F., III. Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
1834–1837.
(9) Zhang, T.; Cheng, L.; Hameed, S.; Liu, L.; Wang, D.; Chen, Y.-J.
Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6644–6646.
We next examined the transformation of product 4a into
final spiro product 5a using various metal salt catalysts,
such as AuCl3, AuBr3, PPh3AuCl, PPh3AuNTf2, Cu(OTf)2,
andsoon.10 The respective yields and selectivities (endo/exo)
(10) For selective reviews of hydroamination reactions, see: (a)
€
Severin, R.; Doye, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1407–1420. (b) Muller,
T. E.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Yus, M.; Foubelo, F.; Tada, M. Chem. Rev. 2008,
108, 3795–3892. (c) Dion, I.; Beauchemin, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011, 50, 8233.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C