bromides, making their use in cross-coupling reactions
highly desirable.
Under these conditions, however, only a 25% yield
of the monoarylated amide 3aa was obtained (Table 1,
entry 1). Based on our previous experience with the aryla-
tion of sulfoxides with aryl chlorides,12 we hypothesized
that catalyst activation might be problematic. We, there-
fore, turned to the Buchwald-type precatalysts (Figure 1),
which readily form active catalysts.15,16 As shown in
Table 1, four common solvents [toluene, cyclopentyl
methyl ether (CPME), dioxane, and dimethoxyethane
(DME)] were screened using the second generation palla-
dium dimer L115,16 with Kwong’s indole-based phosphine
(L; see Scheme 1C). CPME was determined to be the most
effective solvent, providing a mixture of the mono- and bis-
arylated products in a 5:1 ratio (entries 2À5, Table 1).
From these reactions, the monoarylated 3aa was isolated
in up to 63% yield (Table 1, entry 3). The other solvents
(toluene, dioxane, and DME) led to generation of 3aa in
lower yields(15À59%) and with inferior ratios of mono- to
bis-arylated products (Table 1, entry 3 vs 2, 4, and 5).
Further screening of six bases [LiOtBu, NaOtBu, KOtBu,
LiN(SiMe3)2, NaN(SiMe3)2, and KN(SiMe3)2] resulted in
yields from 6À63% of monoarylated 3aa and 2:1 to 5:1
ratios of monoarylated 3aa to bis-arylated 4aa (Table 1,
entries 3 and 6À10). To improve the yield and selectivity
for 3aa, Buchwald’s third generation palladium dimerL217
and the third generation indole-based precatalyst L317
(Figure 1) were investigated with chlorobenzene 1a and
N,N-diethylacetamide 2a. Unfortunately, the ratio of
monoarylation 3aa to bis-arylation 4aa dropped below
3:1 (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). Our best conditions for mono-
arylation of acetamides with aryl chlorides were, therefore,
2.5 mol % second generation palladium dimer L1 and 10 mol %
L with 3 equiv of LiOtBu in CPME at 110 °C for 12 h.
With our optimized reaction conditions, we examined
the scope of aryl chlorides in the monoarylation with 2a
(Table 2). Phenyl chloride (1a) provided a 5:1 ratio of
mono-/bis-arylated products from which the monoaryl-
ated product 3aa was isolated in 63% yield (Table 2,
entry 1). Likewise, alkyl substituted aryl chlorides, such
as 4-tert-butyl chlorobenzene (1b), 4-chlorotoluene (1c),
and 3-chlorotoluene (1d) coupled with 2a in moderate to
good selectivities (5:1À10:1 mono-/bis-arylated product)
in 63À70% yield of the major products (entries 2À4). Aryl
chlorides with ortho-substitution, such as 2-chlorotoluene
and 1-chloronaphthalene, were poor substrates (<10%
yield) in this reaction. This appears to be a limitation of the
palladium catalyst with Kwong’s indole-based phosphine.
Aryl chlorides bearing electron donating groups,
such as 3-chloro-N,N-dimethylaniline (1e) or 1-chloro-4-
methoxybenzene (1f), gave the monocoupled products in
70À72% yield with 7:1 to 10:1 selectivity (entries 5À6).
Lower selectivities(3:1À5:1), however, wereobserved when
We have been interested in the catalytic functionaliza-
tion of weakly acidic sp3-hybridized CÀH bonds9 (pKa’s
28À35 in DMSO) and have recently developed methods for
the in situ deprotonation and coupling of diarylmethanes,10
sulfones,11 sulfoxides,12 and chromium-activated benzylic
amines.9
Based on these advances, we hypothesized that a
palladium-catalyzed deprotonative cross-coupling process
(DCCP) for the arylation of amides (pKa >35) with aryl
chlorides should be possible (Scheme 1C). Herein we
report the first chemoselective mono- and bis-arylation
of N,N-dialkyl acetamide derivatives with aryl chlorides.
The palladium catalyst identified for this challenging
reaction is based on Kwong’s indole phosphine13 and
alkoxide bases.
Scheme 1. Palladium-Catalyzed R-Arylation of Amides
We initiated studies of the R-arylation of amides with
aryl chlorides employing the same catalyst and conditions
we developed for the palladium-catalyzed arylation of
sulfones with aryl bromides11 (PhSO2CH3, pKa 29).14
(8) (a) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4176.
(d) Fu, G. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1555.
(9) (a) McGrew, G. I.; Temaismithi, J.; Carroll, P. J.; Walsh, P. J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5541. (b) Zhang, J.; Stanciu, C.; Wang,
B.; Hussain, M. M.; Da, C.-S.; Carroll, P. J.; Dreher, S. D.; Walsh, P. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20552. (c) McGrew, G. I.; Stanciu, C.;
Zhang, J.; Carroll, P. J.; Dreher, S. D.; Walsh, P. J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2012, 51, 11510.
(10) (a) Zhang, J.; Bellomo, A.; Creamer, A. D.; Dreher, S. D.;
Walsh, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13765. (b) Bellomo, A.;
Zhang, J.; Trongsiriwat, N.; Walsh, P. J. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 849.
(11) Zheng, B.; Jia, T.; Walsh, P. J. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 1690.
(12) Jia, T.; Bellomo, A.; EL Baina, K.; Dreher, S. D.; Walsh, P. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3740.
(13) (a) So, C. M.; Lau, C. P.; Kwong, F. Y. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2795.
(b) Lee, H. W.; Lam, F. L.; So, C. M.; Lau, C. P.; Chan, A. S. C.; Kwong,
F. Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7436.
(14) Matthews, W. S.; Bares, J.; Bartmess, J. E.; Bordwell, F. G.;
Cornforth, F. J.; Drucker, G. E.; Margolin, Z.; McCallum, R. J.;
McCallum, G. J.; Vanier, N. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 7006.
(15) (a) Kinzel, T.; Zhang, Y.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 14073. (b) Shu, W.; Buchwald, S. L. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 2321. (c) Yang,
Y.; Oldenhius, N. J.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 615.
(16) (a) Biscoe, M. R.; Fors, B. P.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 6686. (b) Albert, J.; D’Andrea, L.; Granell, J.; Zafrilla, J.;
Font-Bardia, M.; Solans, X. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 4895.
(17) (a) Bruno, N. C.; Tudge, M. T.; Buchwald, S. L. Chem. Sci. 2013,
4, 916. (b) Bruno, N. C.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2876.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX