586
S.M. Mamba et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 77 (2010) 579–587
Table 8
MIC and MBC values of tested compounds.
Selected bacteria
L
Ni(L)2
Co(L)2
Zn(L)2
[Cu(L)2PPh3]
[Zn(L)2PPh3]
MIC(MBC) (g/mL)
Escherichia coli
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Salmonella typhi
Staphylococcus aureus
Enterococcus faecalis
Bacillus cereus
100–100
100–200
100–200
100–200
100–nf
200–nf
nf–200
nf–nf
nf–nf
200–nf
200–200
nf–nf
100–50
100–100
50–50
50–50
100–200
100–50
nf–100
nf–100
nf–200
nf–200
nf–200
nf–50
nf–nf
nf–200
200–nf
200–nf
200–nf
nf–nf
100–100
nf–100
200–200
nf–nf
100–100
100–100
compounds against fungal growth typically in the case of nickel
complexes as earlier indicated as well as their broad spectrum
activity, was noted. It is, therefore, necessary to evaluate the
cytotoxic effects of these compounds as their applications in the
formulation of novel antifungal therapeutic drugs seem promising.
also show broad antifungal activity and maximum activity being
exhibited by the nickel(II) complex. Because of the broad spectrum
activity displayed by some of the tested compounds, it is would be
necessary to evaluate the cytotoxicity of these compounds as their
applications in the formulation of novel antimicrobial therapeutic
drugs seem promising.
3.6. Antibacterial studies
Acknowledgements
3.6.1. Bacterial susceptibility to tested compounds
The authors are thankful to the National Research Foundation
(NRF) and Nanotech Innovation Centre (NIC) for financially sup-
porting this work.
The disc diffusion assay was conducted to determine if the
tested compounds could inhibit the growth of bacteria. The results
obtained revealed inhibitory activity of all tested compounds
against at least one microorganism (Table 7) and the inhibition
concentration ranged from 15 to 400 g/disc. Zn(L)2 generally
exhibited strong inhibitory activity than any other compound. The
compounds inhibitory activity was greater against S. aureus, while
E. faecalis was resistant to most of the complexes and compounds
tested.
References
[1] K.S. Siqqidi, S.A.A. Nami, L. Chebude, Y. Chebude, Journal of Brazilian Chemical
Society 17 (1) (2006) 107–112.
[2] R. Say, E. Birlik, Z. Erdemgil, A. Denizli, A. Ersoz, Journal of Hazardous Materials
150 (2008) 560–564.
[3] N. Unlu, M. Ersoz, Separation and Purification Technology 52 (2007) 461–469.
[4] F. Fu, H. Zeng, Q. Cai, R. Qiu, J. Yu, Y. Xiong, Chemosphere 69 (2007) 1783–1789.
[5] Y. Yoshikawa, Y. Adachi, H. Sukurai, Life Sciences 80 (2007) 759–766.
[6] S. Ozkirimli, T.I. Apak, M. Kiraz, Yegenoglu, Archives of Pharmacal Research 28
(11) (2005) 1213–1218.
3.6.2. Minimum inhibitory and Minimum Bactericidal
Concentration
Microorganisms are developing resistance against some of the
antibacterial compounds available on the market. Candidate com-
pounds for substitution of existing one, should exhibit strong
mination of MIC and MBC. Results recorded revealed that among
all the compounds Zn(L)2 was effective at lower concentration
(50 g/mL) and also exhibit bactericidal activity against all the bac-
teria (Table 8).
On the other hand Co(L)2 was the compound with the weakest
activity against bacteria and mostly static except with P. aerugi-
nosa. Although [Cu(L)2PPh3] exhibited bactericidal activity against
all bacteria, it was not possible to determine the MIC from its activ-
ity up to a concentration of 200 g/mL. This implies that inhibitory
the increase of turbidity observed in the tube; copper is a bio-
ease of reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) [38,39]. However the inhibitory
activity of complexes is the summation of the effects of the lig-
and and the metal which affect both the bacterial cell wall and
metabolism [39,40].
[7] F. Shaheen, A. Badshah, M. Gielen, C. Gieck, M. Jamil, D. de Vos, Journal of
Organometallic Chemistry 693 (2008) 1117–1126.
[8] V. Alverdi, L. Giovagnini, C. Marzamo, R. Seraglia, F. Bettio, S. Sitran, R. Graziani,
D. Fregona, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 98 (2004) 1117–1128.
[9] R. Singh, N.K. Kaushik, Spectrochimica Acta Part A 71 (2) (2008) 669–675.
[10] H.D. Yin, J. Zhai, Y.Y. Sun, D.Q. Wang, Polyhedron 27 (2008) 663–670.
[11] A. Mohammad, C. Varshney, S.A.A. Nami, Spectrochimica Acta Part A 73 (2009)
20–24.
[12] K.D. Karlin, Progress in Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 53, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,
New Jersey, 2005, p. 71.
[13] D. Chen, L. Powers, Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 58 (1995) 245–253.
[14] A.V. Ivanov, T. Rodyna, O.N. Antzutkin, Polyhedron 17 (18) (1998) 3101–3109.
[15] Y. Yang, B. Zuo, J. Li, G. Chen, Spectrochimica Acta Part A 52 (1996) 1915–1919.
[16] T.S. Carswell, H.L. Morill, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (1937)
1247–1251.
[17] N. Manav, A.K. Mishra, N.K. Kaushik, Spectrochimica Acta Part A 65 (2006)
[18] N. Manav, A.K. Mishra, N.K. Kaushik, Spectrochimica Acta Part A 60 (2004)
3087–3092.
[19] A.P. Rauter, Lucas, T. Almeida, D. Sacoto, V. Ribeiro, J. Justino, A. Neves, F.V.M.
Silva, M.C. Oliveira, M.J. Ferreira, M.S. Santosa, E. Barbosaa, Carbohydrate
Research 340 (2005) 191–201.
[20] M.R.L. Oliviera, V.M. de Bellis, Transition Metal Chemistry 24 (1999) 127–130.
[21] A. Vandebeek, S.J. Joris, K.I. Aspila, C.L. Chakrabarti, Canadian Journal of Chem-
istry 48 (1970) 2204–2209.
[22] N. Geetha, S. Thirumaran, Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society 73 (2) (2008)
169–177.
[23] K.S. Siddiqi, S. Khan, S.A.A. Nami, M.M. El-ajaily, Spectrochimica Acta Part A. 67
(2007) 995–1002.
[24] R.M. Desai, M.K. Shah, V.H. Shah, E-Journal of Chemistry 3 (12) (2006) 137–141.
[25] S.A.A. Nami, K.S. Siddiqi, Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic
and Nanometal Chemistry 34 (9) (2005) 1581–1590.
[26] G.G. Mohamed, A.N. Ibrahim, A.E.H. Attia, Spectrochimica Acta Part A 72 (2009)
610–615.
4. Conclusions
[27] A.B. Prakasam, K. Ramalingam, G. Boceli, A. Cantoni, Polyhedron 26 (2007)
4489–4493.
[28] H.L.M. Van Gaal, J.W. Diesveld, F.W. Pijpers, J.G.M. Van der Linden, Inorganic
Chemistry 18 (11) (1979) 3251–3260.
[29] A.B. Prakasam, K. Ramalingam, G. Boceli, A. Cantoni, Polyhedron 26 (2007)
1133–1138.
[30] V.T. Yilmaz, T.K. Yazicilar, H. Cesur, R. Ozkanca, F.Z. Maras, Synthesis and Reac-
tivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic and Nanometal Chemistry 33 (4) (2003)
589–605.
The characterization techniques confirm that both dithiocar-
bamate ligands are bidentately coordinated to the metal atom
via the sulphur atoms. The metal complexes exhibit antibacterial
activity against the chosen bacterial species. The zinc dithiocarba-
mate complex exhibited antibacterial activity against five bacterial
species. Broad spectrum bactericidal activity is displayed by the
triphenylphosphine adduct of the copper complex. The complexes