.
Angewandte
Communications
radical polymerization process.[11] We herein report the use of
an aqueous emulsion, which was formed by the addition of
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in water and dramatically
accelerated a silver-catalyzed decarboxylative trifluorome-
thylthiolation of secondary and tertiary alkyl carboxylic acids
under mild conditions. Radical-clock and radical-cyclization
experiments suggested that the reaction proceeded through
a free-radical process.
In order to test if the alkyl radical could be trapped by
reagent 1, we initially studied the conversion of 1-adamantane
carboxylic acid to trifluoromethylthiolated adamantine using
reagent 1 in the presence of catalytic amounts of different
silver salts (20 mol%) and 1.0 equivalent of K2S2O8 as the
oxidant in different solvents.[12] As expected, the desired
product was obtained in less than 12% yield when silver salts
such as AgNO3, AgOTf, AgBF4, or AgOAc were used in
different solvents, such as THF, CH3CN, DMF, CH2Cl2, and
acetone, at room temperature or at 508C (results not shown in
the table). Furthermore, no significant improvement was
observed when the reaction was conducted in a solvent
mixture such as CH3CN/H2O (1/1; Table 1, entry 2), acetone/
H2O (1/1), or THF/H2O (1/1). In contrast, the reaction
generated the desired product in 60% yield when it was
conducted in the presence of 1.0 equivalent of sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in CH3CN/H2O (1/1; Table 1,
entry 4). Decreasing the amount of SDS to 0.2 equivalent
led to a higher yield (84%; Table 1, entry 5). Reactions in the
presence of 0.2 equivalent of SDS conducted in acetone/H2O
(1/1) generated the product in 83% yield, while reactions in
other mixed solvents, such as DMF/H2O, THF/H2O, or
CH2Cl2/H2O, were not effective at all (Table 1, entries 7–9).
Interestingly, a higher percentage of water in the mixed
solvent led to an increased yield of the product (92%; Table 1,
entry 6). When the reaction was conducted in pure water with
0.2 equivalent of SDS, the desired product was generated in
98% yield as determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy with an
internal standard (Table 1, entry 10).[13] The yield decreased
to 81% when 0.1 equivalent of SDS was used (Table 1,
entry 11). The use of other surfactants, such as sodium
methylsulfonate or sodium 4-dodecylbenzenesulfonate,
under otherwise the same conditions resulted in much lower
yields (Table 1, entries 12–14). Likewise, the use of other
silver salts as the catalyst also led to lower yields (Table 1,
entries 15–17). In the absence of the silver salt, no product
was observed (Table 1, entry 18).
With an efficient protocol for the decarboxylative tri-
fluoromethylthiolation in hand, we next investigated its scope
with aliphatic carboxylic acids (Table 2). The reaction con-
ditions were quite general for tertiary and secondary alkyl
carboxylic acids. A wide range of substrates with different
functional groups, such as chloride, bromide, esters, and
electron-rich arenes, underwent the efficient decarboxylative
trifluoromethylthiolation to afford the corresponding prod-
ucts in good to excellent yields (Table 2, 3b–c, 3j, 3q–s). A
cyclopropyl carboxylic acid also underwent the decarboxyla-
tive trifluoromethylthiolation to give the corresponding
product in good yields (Table 2, 3e–f). Notably, no competing
electrophilic trifluoromethylthiolation of electron-rich arenes
was observed (Table 2, 3e–f, 3l, 3s). In addition, the reaction
was compatible with alkene and alkyne groups, thus illustrat-
ing an orthogonal reactivity of the silver-catalyzed decarbox-
ylative trifluoromethylthiolation to classical electrophilic
addition reactions (Table 2, 3k–l). Reactions of primary
alkyl carboxylic acids, however, occurred much slower and
in lower yield than those of tertiary and secondary alkyl
carboxylic acids. The desired products were obtained in only
20–30% yield in a mixture of CH3CN/H2O (Table 2, 3t–u).
The reaction of benzoic acid with reagent 1 under the
optimized conditions did not generate the trifluoromethyl-
thiolated product at all. With regard to a possible scale-up of
the reaction, the yield of 3a dropped slightly to 71% when the
reaction was conducted on a 2.0 mmol scale (Table 2).
Table 1: Optimization of reaction conditions for silver-catalyzed decar-
boxylative trifluoromethylthiolation.[a]
Entry AgX
Additive
Solvent
Yield [%][a]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AgNO3
AgNO3
AgNO3
–
–
–
CH3CN
CH3CN/H2O
H2O
11
12
<2
60
84
AgNO3 nC12H25SO3Na[c]
AgNO3 nC12H25SO3Na
AgNO3 nC12H25SO3Na
AgNO3 nC12H25SO3Na
AgNO3 nC12H25SO3Na
AgNO3 nC12H25SO3Na
AgNO3 nC12H25SO3Na
AgNO3 nC12H25SO3Na[f]
AgNO3 CH3SO3Na
CH3CN/H2O
CH3CN/H2O
CH3CN/H2O[d] 92
acetone/H2O
DMF/H2O
CH2Cl2/H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
66
<2
9
<2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
98 (91)[e]
In general, silver-mediated oxidative decarboxylative
functionalization was suggested to proceed through a radical
pathway. The reactivity of the carboxylic acids in Table 2
decreases in the order of tertiary, secondary > primary @ aro-
matic, which also indicates that a radical pathway is likely. In
order to gain experimental evidence to support this assertion,
two sets of experiments were conducted. In the first experi-
ment, cyclopropyl carboxylic acid 4 was prepared as a radical
clock and subjected to the reaction conditions. The ring-
opening products were generated in 87% yield as a mixture of
stereoisomers in a ratio of 3:1 [Eq. (1)]. No trifluorome-
thylthiolated cyclopropane derivative was observed by 1H and
19F NMR spectroscopy of the crude reaction mixture.
81
–
70
3
11
71
59
–
AgNO3 4-(nC12H25)C6H4SO3Na H2O
AgNO3 nBu4NHSO4
AgSbF6 nC12H25SO3Na
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
H2O
AgOTf
AgOAc nC12H25SO3Na
nC12H25SO3Na
nC12H25SO3Na
–
[a] Reaction conditions: 1-adamantane carboxylic acid (0.3 mmol),
reagent 1 (0.45 mmol), AgX (30 mol%), additive (20 mol%), K2S2O8
(0.3 mmol), solvent (2.0 mL, 1:1 (v/v) for mixed solvent) at 508C for
12 h. [b] Yields were determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy with
1-fluoronaphthalene as the internal standard. [c] 1.0 equiv of SDS was
used. [d] 1:2 (v/v). [e] Yield of isolated product. [f] 10 mol% of SDS was
used.
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!