4230
S. Sonda et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11 (2003) 4225–4234
Table 5. 1H NMR spectra.l data for alkylamino and aralkylamino type compounds 8a–k
Compd
No.
d (ppm)
8a
(DMSO-d6)
1.07 (3H, t, J=7.3 Hz), 1.35–1.90 (9H, m), 2.55–3.50 (10H, m), 3.83 (3H, s), 5.75–6.05 (2H, broad), 6.50 (1H, s),
7.42 (1H, d, J=7.9 Hz), 7.62–7.68 (2H, m), 7.67 (1H, s), 8.00–8.02 (1H, m).
8b
(CDCl3)
1.25–2.00 (14H, m), 2.30 (2H, t, J=7.7 Hz,), 2.62 (2H, t, J=7.3 Hz), 2.85–2.98 (2H, m), 3.32 (2H, t, J=5.7 Hz),
3.78 (2H, s), 3.88 (3H, s), 4.44 (2H, brS), 6.29 (1H, s), 7.20–7.36 (5H, m), 7.73–7.77 (1H, m), 8.09 (1H, s).
8c
(CDCl3)
1.24–2.05 (12H, m), 2.17 (2H, s), 2.25–2.40 (4H, m), 2.90–3.01 (2H, t, J=5.7 Hz), 3.32 (2H, t, J=6.1 Hz),
3.47 (4H, d, J=3.3 Hz), 3.89 (3H, s), 4.38 (2H, brs), 6.29 (1H, s), 7.19–7.74 (5H, m), 7.72–7.74 (1H, m), 8.10 (1H, s).
8d
(CDCl3)
0.85 (3H, t, J=3.5 Hz), 1.20–1.75 (13H, m), 1.85–1.96 (2H, m), 2.24–2.43 (6H, m), 2.88–2.96 (2H, m),
3.31 (2H, t, J=6.6 Hz), 3.53 (2H, s), 3.87 (3H, s), 4.51 (2H, s), 6.30 (1H, s), 7.16–7.35 (5H, m), 7.71–7.79 (1H, m),
8.09 (1H, s).
8e
(DMSO-d6)
1.06 (3H, t, J=6.9 Hz), 1.15–1.90 (11H, m), 2.70–3.50 (12H, m), 3.78 (3H, s), 3.83 (3H, s), 4.17 (2H, s),
5.70–6.15 (2H, broad), 6.50 (1H, s), 6.99 (2H, d, J=8.6 Hz), 7.45 (2H, d, J=8.6 Hz), 7.66 (1H, s), 8.00–8.03(1H, m).
8f
(CDCl3)
1.25 (11H, m), 2.01–2.16 (2H, m), 2.35–2.45 (2H, m), 2.65 (2H, t, J=6.9 Hz), 2.85–3.10 (2H, m),
3.32 (2H, t, J=6.2 Hz), 3.89 (3H, s), 3.97 (3H, s), 4.45 (2H, brs), 6.31 (1H, s), 6.90–7.30 (3H, m), 7.77–7.87 (1H, m),
8.09 (1H, s).
8g
(CDCl3)
1.16 (3H, t, J=7.3 Hz), 1.20–1.90 (11H, m), 2.70–3.50 (12H, m), 3.82 (3H, s), 4.29 (2H, s), 5.80–6.10 (2H, broad),
6.49 (1H, s), 7.07–7.09 (1H, m), 7.24–7.25 (1H, m), 7.60–7.62 (1H, m), 7.66 (1H, s), 8.00–8.02 (1H, m).
8h
(CDCl3)
1.05 (3H, t, J=7.3Hz,), 1.18–2.02 (13H, m), 2.22 (2H, t, J=7.9 Hz), 2.45 (2H, t, J=7.9 Hz), 2.55 (2H, q, J=7.2 Hz),
2.81–2.94 (2H, m), 3.31 (2H, t, J=6.3 Hz), 3.87 (3H, s), 3.95 (2H, s), 4.39 (2H, brs), 6.27 (1H, s), 7.38–7.55 (4H, m),
7.70–7.87 (3H, m), 8.10 (1H, s), 8.30–8.34 (1H, m).
8i
(CDCl3)
1.05 (3H, t, J=7.0 Hz,), 1.19–1.95 (15H, m), 2.26 (2H, t, J=7.9 Hz), 2.45 (2H, t, J=7.9 Hz), 2.55 (2H, q, J=7.2 Hz),
2.81–2.94 (2H, m), 3.31 (2H, t, J=6.3 Hz), 3.87 (3H, s), 4.39 (2H, brs), 6.27 (1H, s), 7.42–7.52 (3H, m),
7.70–7.84 (5H, m), 8.11 (1H, s).
8j
(DMSO-d6)
0.86–1.90 (21H, m), 2.60–3.50 (14H, m), 3.82 (3H, s), 5.92 (2H, brs), 6.48 (1H, s), 7.66 (1H, s), 7.96–8.01 (1H, m).
8k
(CDCl3)
0.72–0.84 (2H, m), 1.09–1.80 (20H, m), 2.01–2.13(2H, m), 2.16 (2H, d, J=7.3Hz), 2.32 (2H, t, J=7.3Hz),
2.36–2.44 (2H, m), 2.99–3.07 (2H, m), 3.32 (2H, t, J=5.9 Hz), 3.48 (2H, s), 3.90 (3H, s), 4.40 (2H, s), 6.30 (1H, s),
7.17–7.33 (5H, m), 7.73–7.80 (1H, m), 8.10 (1H, s).
absorption rate of analogues. [The compound having a
benzene group instead of the 1-methylindole, 1b8
showed low intestinal absorption rate (18.9%) as shown
in Table 1].
show 5-HT4 receptor agonistic activity. The tertiary
amine type, ethyl(2-thienylmethyl)amino derivative 8g
possessed better intestinal absorption rate (57.9%) than
the secondary amine type, (2-thienylmethyl)amino
derivative 8f (9.3%).
The aralkylamine and alkylamine type compounds 8a–k
had high and selective 5-HT4 receptor binding affinity as
shown in Table 2. The secondary amine type, benzyl-
amino derivative 8b revealed potent 5-HT4 receptor
agonistic activity (EC50=3.7 nM), although it showed
poor intestinal absorption rate (26.5%). The tertiary
amine type, benzyl(methyl)amino derivative 8c and
benzyl(propyl)amino derivative 8d also showed poor
intestinal absorption rate (24.8 and 33.6%, respec-
tively). A decrease in intestinal absorption rate was
observed when a methoxy group was at the 4-position
of the benzene ring (compound 8e, 8.3%). Introduction
of chlorine atoms into the 3,4-positions of the benzene
ring resulted in a moderately increased intestinal
absorption rate (8a, 47.5%). However, compound 8a
did not show 5-HT4 receptor agonistic activity. The
compound 8k with benzyl(cyclohexylmethyl)amino
group showed no 5-HT4 receptor agonistic activity. On
the other hand, the benzylamino derivative 8b and
cyclohexylmethylamino derivative 8j possessed 5-HT4
receptor agonistic activities. These results indicated that
the compounds with a bulky substituent group (such as
(3,4-dichlorobenzyl)ethylamino or benzyl(cyclohexyl-
methyl)amino) on the terminal of the straight alkyl
chain at the 1-position on the piperidine ring did not
A correlation between the logP value and the %
absorption of aralkylamine derivatives was low as
shown in Figure 2. Although naphthylmethyl deriva-
tives 8h (logP=1.8) and 8i (logP=1.4) were more lipo-
philic than 8a–g (logP=À0.9–1.1, octanol/pH 6.8
buffer), a modest increase in lipophilicity was not
sufficient to confer improved intestinal absorption rate
(Fig. 2). In the aralkylamine and alkylamine derivatives
series 8a–k, the potency (EC50=3.7–62.5 nM) of tested
compounds was weaker than that of compounds 1a
(EC50=1.2 nM) and 1b (EC50=3.7 nM). Furthermore,
the intestinal absorption rates of tested compounds
were also as poor as those of compound 1a and 1b
(Table 1).
The benzoyl type compounds 11a–d and phenylsulfonyl
type compounds 12a–c also showed selective and high 5-
HT4 receptor binding affinity as depicted in Table 3.
Compounds 11a–d and 12a–c revealed potent 5-HT4
receptor agonistic activities. These results suggested that
the benzoyl and phenylsulfonyl moiety at its side-chain
part at the 1-position on the piperidine ring played an
important role in enhancing 5-HT4 receptor agonistic
activity as well as the 1-methylindol-3-yl carbonylamino