Expanding RO Substrate Range
to bind the bulky 2,6-dichlorobiphenyl in a productive orienta- in the catalytic reaction (36), moved significantly during sub-
tion (17). Because dibenzofuran is obligatory co-planar, any strate binding in all variants (BphAELB400, BphAEp4, and
misplacement of the distal ring would influence the orientation BphAERR41).
of the proximal ring inside the catalytic pocket. Therefore, con-
Altogether, our analysis shows that evolving ROs to change
sistent with an induced fit mechanism, in BphAEp4 and their substrate specificity is a rather complex enterprise that
BphAERR41, the displacement of Gly321 appears to be required does not exclusively involve mutations at key residues in direct
to reduce the influence it exerts through atomic interactions on contact with the substrate. It appears that some mutations
the substrate’s distal ring.
affect key residues associated with necessary conformational
In this work, we highlighted a second and more subtle route changes that are more difficult to identify by a rational
to changes in substrate range, which implies that in ROs, either approach but that are required to allow productive or improved
one or both of the induced fit or protein dynamic processes are interplay of reaction-critical atoms both inside and outside the
involved to place the protein atoms involved in the reaction into substrate-binding pocket.
proper relationships that facilitate catalysis. The reaction cata-
lyzed by ROs is complex; it not only involves substrate binding
and release of product, but also one dioxygen molecule is
required in the reaction, and electrons must be transferred
from the ferredoxin component to the Rieske cluster of one ␣
subunit and then to the catalytic iron of the vicinal ␣ subunit.
Furthermore, a recent report showed residues at the interface
between the Rieske domain and the catalytic domain move dur-
ing formation of the complex between the oxygenase and ferre-
doxin components of carbazole 1,9a-dioxygenase (24). This
implies that reaction-critical atoms from the Rieske domain
must align properly with those of the vicinal catalytic domain,
and the reaction-critical atoms of the catalytic domain must
align properly to work together during the catalytic process.
Structural analysis shows that residues located on secondary
structures ␣6 and ␣12 are involved in subunit assembly, and
biochemical data suggest that they are involved in the catalytic
reaction (electron transfer and protonation) (2, 38). The fact
that these residues move during substrate binding is consistent
with a substrate-induced retuning process required to suitably
align the protein atoms involved in the chemical steps of the
reaction. In such a context, by altering the interactions occur-
ring between secondary structure elements surrounding the
catalytic center, the N338Q mutation generates a protein
unable to stabilize the ␣33 assembly previously shown to be
required for activity (31). However, the double N338Q and
L409F substitution generates an ␣ subunit that supports a sta-
ble hexamer and where the retuning process is improved com-
pared with its BphAELB400 and BphAEp4 parents, resulting in a
more efficient and faster catalytic reaction. ROs can thus be
engineered to enhance their catalytic properties toward new
substrates by altering the process involved in fine-tuning the
interplay between the reaction-critical atoms.
Acknowledgment—We appreciate the use of the SE Regional Collab-
orative Access Team 22-ID Beamline in the collection of x-ray diffrac-
tion data.
REFERENCES
1. Jakoncic, J., Jouanneau, Y., Meyer, C., and Stojanoff, V. (2007) Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 352, 861–866
2. Kauppi, B., Lee, K., Carredano, E., Parales, R. E., Gibson, D. T., Eklund, H.,
and Ramaswamy, S. (1998) Structure 6, 571–586
3. Furukawa, K., Suenaga, H., and Goto, M. (2004) J. Bacteriol. 186,
5189–5196
4. Haddock, J. D., Horton, J. R., and Gibson, D. T. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177,
20–26
5. Sylvestre, M. (2004) Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 54, 153–162
6. Chang, Y. S. (2008) J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15, 152–171
7. Mohammadi, M., and Sylvestre, M. (2005) Chem. Biol. 12, 835–846
8. Chun, H. K., Ohnishi, Y., Shindo, K., Misawa, N., Furukawa, K., and Horin-
ouchi, S. (2003) J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 21, 113–121
9. Seeger, M., Gonza´lez, M., Ca´mara, B., Mun˜oz, L., Ponce, E., Mejías, L.,
Mascayano, C., Va´squez, Y., and Sepu´lveda-Boza, S. (2003) Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 69, 5045–5050
10. Seo, J., Kang, S. I., Won, D., Kim, M., Ryu, J. Y., Kang, S. W., Um, B. H., Pan,
C. H., Ahn, J. H., Chong, Y., Kanaly, R. A., Han, J., and Hur, H. G. (2011)
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 89, 1773–1782
11. Erickson, B. D., and Mondello, F. J. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 2903–2912
12. Mondello, F. J., Turcich, M. P., Lobos, J. H., and Erickson, B. D. (1997)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 3096–3103
13. Barriault, D., Plante, M. M., and Sylvestre, M. (2002) J. Bacteriol. 184,
3794–3800
14. Barriault, D., and Sylvestre, M. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 47480–47488
15. Ferraro, D. J., Okerlund, A. L., Mowers, J. C., and Ramaswamy, S. (2006) J.
Bacteriol. 188, 6986–6994
16. Furusawa, Y., Nagarajan, V., Tanokura, M., Masai, E., Fukuda, M., and
Senda, T. (2004) J. Mol. Biol. 342, 1041–1052
17. Kumar, P., Mohammadi, M., Viger, J. F., Barriault, D., Gomez-Gil, L.,
Eltis, L. D., Bolin, J. T., and Sylvestre, M. (2011) J. Mol. Biol. 405,
531–547
Many questions remain unanswered; crystal structure anal-
ysis did not determine a clear-cut mechanism by which the
double N338Q/L409F substitution affects the enzyme structure
and catalytic properties, and our data do not determine which
of the enzymatic steps are accelerated during the reaction.
Although the data do not provide any direct demonstration that
the N338Q and L409F substitutions either affect an induced fit
or protein dynamic mechanism involved in the catalytic reac-
tion, it is clear from crystal structure analysis that these residues
occupy strategic positions whereby they can interact with reac-
tion-critical protein atoms/groups and affect oligomeric
assembly. Furthermore, residues of helix ␣12 and ␣6, and espe-
cially Asp388 and Gln226, which are postulated to play a key role
18. Suenaga, H., Goto, M., and Furukawa, K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276,
22500–22506
19. Suenaga, H., Mitsuoka, M., Ura, Y., Watanabe, T., and Furukawa, K. (2001)
J. Bacteriol. 183, 5441–5444
20. Suenaga, H., Nishi, A., Watanabe, T., Sakai, M., and Furukawa, K. (1999)
J. Biosci. Bioeng. 87, 430–435
21. Ve´zina, J., Barriault, D., and Sylvestre, M. (2007) J. Bacteriol. 189, 779–788
22. Zielinski, M., Kahl, S., Hecht, H. J., and Hofer, B. (2003) J. Bacteriol. 185,
6976–6980
23. Zielinski, M., Kahl, S., Standfuss-Gabisch, C., Ca´mara, B., Seeger, M., and
Hofer, B. (2006) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 2191–2199
24. Inoue, K., Ashikawa, Y., Umeda, T., Abo, M., Katsuki, J., Usami, Y., Nogu-
chi, H., Fujimoto, Z., Terada, T., Yamane, H., and Nojiri, H. (2009) J. Mol.
Biol. 392, 436–451
27620 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
VOLUME 286•NUMBER 31•AUGUST 5, 2011