Easy synthesis of phenyl oligomers using a Ni complex
Laura O. Péres, Françoise Guillet and Gérard Froyer *
LPC, IMN, 2 Rue de la Houssinière, Nantes, France. E-mail: Gerard.Froyer@cnrs-imn.fr;
Fax: ϩ33(2) 4037 3991; Tel: ϩ33(2) 4037 3988
Received 7th January 2004, Accepted 7th January 2004
First published as an Advance Article on the web 21st January 2004
In this work are described the syntheses of p-sexiphenyl
and p-octiphenyl starting from 4-bromo-p-terphenyl and
4-bromo-p-quaterphenyl, respectively, by using a nickel
complex in the presence of bipyridine with DMF as
solvent. This type of synthesis was shown to give an
improved yield as well as easy preparation and purification
of these phenylene oligomers.
sation of dihaloaromatic compounds to give π-conjugated
polymers in the presence of Ni(COD)2. To avoid the above-
described problems, in this work on the synthesis of phenylene
oligomers, we have used this general method of C–C bond
formation in the presence of nickel complex. We describe below
the synthesis of p-sexiphenyl (I) and p-octiphenyl (II), using
4-bromo-p-terphenyl (III) and 4-bromo-p-quaterphenyl (IV)
respectively (Fig. 1).
The study of semi-conducting polymers like poly(p-phenylene)
(PPP), poly(p-thiophene) (PPT), poly(p-phenylene vinylene)
(PPV) and polyaniline (PAn) has dramatically increased after
the discovery of the high conductivity of doped polyacetylene
(PA) by Shirakawa et al. in 1977.1 However, the complexity of
the polymer usually formed, hindered the completion of the
study. Studies on model molecules, usually oligomers,2–5 allow a
good understanding of the characteristics of the corresponding
polymer, since they possess a defined degree of polymerization
and consequently uniformity.
But the key question is: from which size is the oligomer
representative of the polymer? For PPP it is believed that
these characteristics begin to be observed starting from
p-quaterphenyl (oligomer with four aromatic rings), for the
vibrational characteristics at least.
Another very important point in research using oligomers
is their preparation, because of the high degree of purity
required. There are a lot of methods in the literature proposed
for the coupling of aromatic rings. Among the classical
methods, are found the reactions of Grignard, Fittig, Ullmann
or Wurtz, but these well known methods are not favorable for
the synthesis of phenyl oligomers due to several limitations
such as: low yield, drastic conditions of synthesis, tedious
purification, non-reproduceable results and multiple step
synthesis.6–11 For example:
Fig. 1 Synthesis of p-sexiphenyl (I) and p-octiphenyl (II).
The synthesis of the monobromo compound is an important
factor in the formation of the oligomers. The starting product
should have only one bromine, located at the 4-position of the
aromatic ring, in order to form the desired oligomer. The point
in this type of synthesis is to avoid the insertion of more than
one bromine. For p-terphenyl, the substitution of the first
bromine atom at the 4-position happens rather easily, but the
substitution of a second bromine in the 4Ј-position is more
complicated.
In the case of p-quaterphenyl, the situation is quite different.
The presence of a bromine atom at one of the extremities
(4-position) is not able to hinder the substitution of the second
bromine, because of the molecule length, therefore the final
product results in a mixture of 4-bromo-p-quaterphenyl and
4,4Ј-dibromo-p-quaterphenyl. In the case of terphenyl even
if there is, in the final product, the presence of 4,4Ј-dibromo-
p-terphenyl it is always possible to separate the compounds by
sublimation. For the quaterphenyl this is not so easy. When an
certain quantity of dibromo compound is mixed with the
monobromo, we observed that these two materials formed a
composite crystal, preventing the separation of the two com-
pounds. The solution was to reduce the ratio reactant : bromine
(1 : 0.8), even if that results in a smaller yield of the desired
compound. In this way, although the synthesis is incomplete
and an amount of starting material (p-quaterphenyl) remains, it
is easily recovered. The monobromo compound and a small
quantity of dibromo product can be separated through
sublimation.
In the work developed by Cadê and Pilbeam7 the butyl-
lithium was reacted with 4-bromo-p-terphenyl in the presence
of cobalt chloride and butyl bromide. In this synthesis the
p-sexiphenyl, whose yield was not mentioned, was obtained
after distillations, washing, extractions with hydrochloric acid,
water and then benzene followed by sublimation. But, the yields
mentioned for the products are given before final rigorous
purification.
In 1964, Doss and Solomon10 presented a p-sexiphenyl
synthesis in which this oligomer was obtained with a yield of
1% after irradiation electrochemistry of the p-terphenyl at
320 ЊC for 14 hours.
Kovacic and Lange12 synthesized p-sexiphenyl by chemical
polymerization of p-terphenyl, using AlCl3/CuCl2 as a catalyst.
The process, under optimised conditions, lead to a mixture of
oligomers with 35% yield. However, although their UV-Vis
absorption spectrum and melting points correspond to the
literature values, the infrared absorption spectra present some
shifted bands, for example the one corresponding to the C–H
in-plane vibration is found at 811 cmϪ1 whereas it should
be at 814 cmϪ1, which could be due to a contamination of the
obtained material.
The infrared spectra of these three compounds show import-
ant differences in the low-frequency range between 900 and
600 cmϪ1. Strong absorption bands come from the out-of-plane
(oop) bending of the C–H bonds. For p-quaterphenyl three
bands can be seen at 823, 750 and 682 cmϪ1 (Fig. 2). When a
bromine atom is inserted (4-bromo-p-quaterphenyl) a shift of
the bands is observed (808, 762 and 687 cmϪ1). However for a
product with two bromines (4,4Ј-dibromo-p-quaterphenyl) the
IR spectra show a strong band at 804 cmϪ1. The intensity of this
band is so strong, that it hides the others, only a small band
appears at 822 cmϪ1 that could come from some unreacted
p-quaterphenyl.
The use of nickel complex to promote a C–C bond was
extensively studied13–17 in the case of dehalogenative conden-
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 4 , 2, 4 5 2 – 4 5 4
T h i s j o u r n a l i s © T h e R o y a l S o c i e t y o f C h e m i s t r y 2 0 0 4
452