Mladenova et al.
originate from the fluorenyl cation. The acid-catalyzed
thermal reaction of diol 1b gives products derived only
from the fluorenyl cation. The corresponding benzyl
cation from 1b would be expected to be less stable than
the fluorenyl cation. Hydride migration appears to be
preferred over phenyl shift by a ratio of 2:1 in the dark
reaction. The photolysis of 1b leads to secondary photo-
products that originate from the pinacol rearrangement.
The product distribution indicates a preference for phenyl
over hydride migration. This difference may be explained
in terms of the presence of acid in the dark reaction,
which could result in thermodynamic equilibration be-
tween 2b1 and 2b2 favoring the former, although this
speculation could not be independently confirmed under
the conditions of the dark reaction. Alternatively, a later
transition state in the acid reaction favoring the ther-
modynamic product may be influencing the course of the
dark reaction. Similar observations have been reported
by other groups where pinacol rearrangement of 1,2-
diphenylethane-1,2-diol under neutral heterogeneous
conditions results in products favoring phenyl over hy-
dride migration by a factor of 3:1.19 These observations
are in sharp contrast to classical studies of the same
reaction carried out in acidic conditions.20 Thus, our
results show that in neutral solutions phenyl migration
is preferred over hydride even though the phenyl group
is better than hydrogen in stabilizing the secondary
oxonium ion. The pinacol rearrangement of diol 1c still
takes place on photoexcitation unlike the dark acid
conditions. The primary product, 9-formyfluorene, un-
dergoes rapid decarbonylation under these conditions as
evident from the labeling studies.
Exp er im en ta l Section
Photolyses were performed using a 450 W medium-pressure
mercury arc lamp in a water-cooled quartz immersion well.
Pyrex tubes containing samples dissolved in the solvent system
specified were strapped around the immersion well, and the
whole assembly was immersed in a water bath. Deaeration of
the solutions was accomplished by purging with nitrogen or
argon. Diol 1a was prepared according to a literature proce-
dure.10 NMR spectra were obtained from a 400 MHz spec-
trometer.
Laser flash photolysis experiments were carried out at room
temperature using 6 ns 308 nm pulses, from an excimer laser
(XeCl; <40 mJ /pulse). The laser system has been described in
detail.21 Solutions were prepared by adding a small amount
of a stock solution (2 × 10-4 M) of the samples in TFE or HFIP.
Solutions were contained in 7 × 7 mm2 Suprasil quartz cells
and were either aerated or purged with nitrogen or oxygen
before laser excitation.
9-(Hydr oxy-ph en yl-m eth yl)-9H-flu or en -9-ol (1b). To 9,9-
dichlorofluorene22 (0.5 g, 2.14 mmol) in THF (25 mL) cooled
to -78 °C was added butyllithium (0.85 mL, 2.5 M in hexane).
After 10 min at -78 °C, the mixture was treated with a
solution of benzaldehyde (0.22 g, 2.14 mmol) in THF (5 mL).
The mixture was left to warm to ambient and added to an
aqueous solution (30 mL) acidified with 2 M HCl. The organic
layer was extracted with dichloromethane (2 × 10 mL), and
the extract was evaporated to dryness. The mixture was
separated by chromatography (silica gel; hexane/ethyl acetate
(8:1)) and yielded 0.46 g (75%) of the diol as a white solid, mp
127 °C (lit.23 mp 126 °C): 1H NMR δ 2.82 (s, 1H, OH), 3.17 (d,
1H, OH, J ) 1.96 Hz), 5.27 (d, 1H, J ) 3.76 Hz), 6.75 (d, 2H,
J ) 7.6 Hz), 6.89 (t, 2H, J ) 7.56 Hz), 6.97 (d, 1H, J ) 8.36
Hz), 7.28-7.23 (m, 4H), 7.35 (t, 2H, J ) 3.32 Hz), 7.56(d, 1H,
J ) 3.36 Hz), 7.64 (d, 1H, J ) 7.16 Hz).
9-Hyd r oxym eth yl-9H-flu or en -9-ol (1c). To a solution of
LiAlH4 (0.03 g, 0.78 mmol) in 10 mL THF was added 9-hy-
droxy-9-fluorenecarboxylic acid (0.2 g, 0.88 mmol) in THF (15
mL), and the mixture was left to stir for 30 min. The mixture
was quenched with methanol (5 mL) and then water (10 mL).
The mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 5 mL)
and run through a silica gel plug, and the extract was
evaporated to dryness to yield 0.18 g (97%) of the diol as a
white solid, mp 94-96 °C: 1H NMR δ 7.64 (dd, 4H, J ) 7.52,
7.48 Hz), 7.40 (t, 2H, J ) 7.42 Hz), 7.31 (t, 2H, J ) 7.44 Hz),
3.85 (d, 2H, J ) 6 Hz), 2.51 (s, 1H, OH), 2.33-2.30 (t, 1H,
OH), 1J ) 6.46 Hz) ppm. MS data of this compound were
previously reported.24
The intermediacy of a zwitterion, resulting from pho-
toheterolysis of diol 1a followed by proton transfer, was
examined by comparison of photoproducts obtained from
epoxide 5, as well as by comparison of transients in the
LFP experiments. Product distributions were similar
except for the absence of the methanol-quenched product
7b in the photolysis of epoxide 5. Although this suggests
that the zwitterion is shorter-lived than its conjugate acid
(9a ), the LFP results indicate that transients with similar
spectra and lifetimes are obtained from both diol and
epoxide. On the basis of the combined transient and
product studies, it is difficult to conclude whether the
transient generated from epoxide 5 is an initial zwitterion
or whether rapid protonation leads to the conjugate acid,
cation 9a , which is also generated by photolysis of diol
1a . An alternate possibility is that the zwitterion and
conjugate acid 9a are in equilibrium in HFIP, although
the differences in product distribution suggest that this
is not the case in methanol/acetonitrile. Because nucleo-
philic trapping gives little or no product in all of the
solvents examined, rearrangement is likely to be the
primary reaction in each case. Further studies associated
with related diols and epoxides substituted with electron-
withdrawing groups so as to stabilize such zwitterions
are in progress.
Did eu ter a ted 9-Hyd r oxym eth yl-9H-flu or en -9-ol (1c-
d 2). The same procedure as for the preparation of diol 1c was
followed, but LiAlD4 was used instead of LiAlH4. The yield
was the same, and the 1H NMR spectrum was identical to that
of diol 1c, except that the peak at δ 3.8 ppm was absent.
Acid -Ca ta lyzed Da r k Rea ction s. Gen er a l P r oced u r e.
Diols 1a -c (10 mg) were dissolved in 1 mL of CDCl3 containing
a crystal of toluenesulfonic acid and monitored by NMR
spectroscopy with comparison to authentic samples prepared
according to the literature.
P r od u ct Stu d ies. Gen er a l P r oced u r e. Nitrogen-purged
solutions of diols 1a -c (2 × 10-3M) in 50 mL of methanol/
acetonitrile (4:1) were irradiated in a Pyrex tube for 1 h. After
evaporation of the solvent the residue was separated by
preparative TLC (silica gel, ethyl acetate/hexane (1:8)).
P h otop r od u cts fr om Diol 1a . 9-Ben zoyl-9-p h en ylflu o-
r en e (2a ): 31%; mp 168-170 °C (lit.25 172 °C); 1H NMR δ 7.80
(18) Matsumoto, Kiyoshi; Goto, Ryozo; Sera, Akira; Asano, Tsutomu.
Nippon Kagaku Zasshi 1966, 87, 1076-82.
(21) Kazanis, S.; Azarani, A.; J ohnston, L. J . J . Phys. Chem. 1991,
95, 4430.
(22) Ray, F. E.; Albertson, C. E. J . Chem. Soc. 1905, 87, 1249.
(23) Corey, E. J .; Noe, M. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11038.
(24) Verardo, G.; Strazzolini, P.; Giumanini, A. G.; Poiana, M. J .
Photochem. Photobiol., A 1989, 48, 115.
(19) Hsien, M.; Sheu, H.-T.; Lee, T.; Cheng, S.; Lee, J .-F. J . Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 2002, 181, 189-200.
(20) Daniloff, S.; Venus-Danilova, E. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1926,
59B 1032-43.
2022 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 69, No. 6, 2004