8868
S. Chen et al. / Electrochimica Acta 55 (2010) 8863–8869
and UV–vis spectra of the phenoxonium cations, hemiketals and
quinones associated with all phenolic compounds.
4. Conclusions
Infrared spectroscopic measurements made during the oxida-
tion of several phenols led to the detection of a range of products
depending on the lifetimes of the oxidised compounds. The com-
pounds that formed long-lived phenoxonium cations showed two
infrared absorbances between 1685 and 1650 cm−1 (sometimes
overlapping into one band) due to the carbonyl stretching and
symmetric ring stretching modes and a band at approximately
1600 cm−1 due to the asymmetric ring stretching mode. The
phenoxonium cations also showed a very intense band at approx-
imately 1500 cm−1, which is possibly associated with a C–O single
bond mode(s). The solution phase spectra of the ring-opened
quinones showed a single strong infrared band in the carbonyl
region at approximately 1650 cm−1. The UV–vis spectra of phenox-
onium cations showed intense bands at 293–296 nm and relatively
less intense bands at 434–460 nm, compared to the long-term para-
quinone oxidation products that showed bands at 256–264 nm.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by a Singapore Government Ministry
of Education research grant (T208B1222).
References
[1] Z. Rappoport (Ed.), The Chemistry of Phenols, Wiley, New York, 2003.
[2] K. Yoshida, Electrooxidation in Organic Chemistry: the Role of Cation Radicals
as Synthetic Intermediates, Wiley, New York, 1983, p. 174.
[3] O. Hammerich, B. Svensmark, in: H. Lund, M.M. Baizer (Eds.), Organic Electro-
chemistry, third ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1991 (Chapter 16).
[4] A. Rieker, R. Beisswenger, K. Regier, Tetrahedron 47 (1991) 645.
[5] H. Eickhoff, G. Jung, A. Rieker, Tetrahedron 57 (2001) 353.
[6] V.D. Parker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91 (1969) 5380.
Fig. 5. In situ electrochemical UV–vis spectra obtained in CH3CN containing 0.2 M
Bu4NPF6 during the oxidation of approximately 1 mM of the phenols at −20 ◦C. (· · ·)
Starting phenols. (—) Intermediate scans. (—) Final scan.
[7] R.D. Webster, Electrochem. Commun. 1 (1999) 581.
[8] L.L. Williams, R.D. Webster, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 12441.
[9] S.B. Lee, C.Y. Lin, P.M.W. Gill, R.D. Webster, J. Org. Chem. 70 (2005) 10466.
[10] G.J. Wilson, C.Y. Lin, R.D. Webster, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 11540.
[11] S.B. Lee, A.C. Willis, R.D. Webster, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 9332.
[12] R.D. Webster, Acc. Chem. Res. 40 (2007) 251.
[13] H.M. Peng, R.D. Webster, J. Org. Chem. 73 (2008) 2169.
[14] W.W. Yao, H.M. Peng, R.D. Webster, J. Phys. Chem. B 112 (2008) 6847.
[15] H.M. Peng, B.F. Choules, W.W. Yao, Z. Zhang, R.D. Webster, P.M.W. Gill, J. Phys.
Chem. B 112 (2008) 10367.
[16] W.W. Yao, H.M. Peng, R.D. Webster, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009) 21805.
[17] K. Dimroth, W. Umbach, H. Thomas, Chem. Ber. 100 (1967) 132.
[18] B. Speiser, A. Rieker, J. Chem. Res. (S) (1977) 314.
[19] B. Speiser, A. Rieker, J. Electroanal. Chem. 102 (1979) 373.
[20] B. Speiser, A. Rieker, J. Electroanal. Chem. 110 (1980) 231.
[21] A. Vigalok, B. Rybtchinski, Y. Gozin, T.S. Koblenz, Y. Ben-David, H. Rozenberg,
D. Milstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 15692.
[22] M. Novak, S.A. Glover, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 7748.
[23] M. Novak, S.A. Glover, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 8090.
[24] S.A. Glover, M. Novak, Can. J. Chem. 83 (2005) 1372.
[25] M. Novak, M.J. Poturalski, W.L. Johnson, M.P. Jones, Y. Wang, S.A. Glover, J. Org.
Chem. 71 (2006) 3778.
[26] Y.-T. Wang, J. Wang, M.S. Platz, M. Novak, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 14566.
[27] M. Novak, A.M. Brinster, J.N. Dickhoff, J.M. Erb, M.P. Jones, S.H. Leopold, A.T.
Vollman, Y.-T. Wang, S.A. Glover, J. Org. Chem. 72 (2007) 9954.
[28] Y.-T. Wang, K.J. Jin, S.H. Leopold, J. Wang, H.-L. Peng, M.S. Platz, J. Xue, D.L.
Phillips, S.A. Glover, M. Novak, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 16021.
[29] Y.-T. Wang, M. Novak, J. Org. Chem. 74 (2009) 7697.
Fig. 6. UV–vis spectra of approximately 1 mM of the quinones obtained in CH3CN
at 22 ( 2) ◦C.
[30] A.J. Fry, W.E. Britton, in: P.T. Kissinger, W.R. Heineman (Eds.), Laboratory Tech-
niques in Electroanalytical Chemistry, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984 (Chapter
13).
[31] A. Patel, T. Netscher, L. Gille, K. Mereiter, T. Rosenau, Tetrahedron 63 (2007)
5312.
[32] R.D. Webster, A.M. Bond, T. Schmidt, J. Chem. Soc. [Perkin] 2 (1995) 1365.
[33] R.D. Webster, G.A. Heath, A.M. Bond, J. Chem. Soc. [Dalton] (2001) 3189.
[34] R.D. Webster, G.A. Heath, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3 (2001) 2588.
[35] R.D. Webster, J. Chem. Soc. [Perkin] 2 (2002) 1882.
and 7a at high concentrations with NOSbF6 were complicated and
showed a number of bands in the carbonyl region that were weak
in intensity suggesting that a number of products were formed (in
addition to the phenoxonium cations or quinones) and were diffi-
cult to interpret. Therefore, although Scheme 1 and Fig. 1 represent
a general reaction pathway, it is likely that in many cases other
reactions can occur making it difficult to fully characterise the FTIR
[36] R.D. Webster, Electrochem. Commun. 5 (2003) 6.
[37] D.L. Pavia, G.M. Lampman, G.S. Kriz, Introduction to Spectroscopy, Thomson
Learning, Singapore, 2001, p. 48.