30
M. Ishifune et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 611 (2000) 26–31
added into a round-bottomed flask equipped with
reflux condenser jointed to a balloon of nitrogen, and
refluxed for 2 h. Then, the resulting oil was concen-
trated and distilled under reduce pressure (b.p. 159°C/
15 mHg) to give 1,3-dichloro-1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-
2,2-diphenyltrisilane (6). IR (neat) 3070, 2954, 2893,
placed 1 g of LiClO4. and the cell was dried at 50°C in
vacuo for 3 h. Chlorotrimethylsilane (0.1 ml) and 15 ml
of dry THF were then added under a nitrogen atmo-
sphere. After pre-electrolysis was carried out using the
same procedure as for trisilane, 3–5 mmol of the
monomer (9 or 6) was syringed into the cell in a stream
of nitrogen. The electroreduction was performed under
constant current conditions (50 mA), and the polarity
of the electrodes was alternated with an interval of 15 s
using a comutator. During the electrolysis the ultra-
sound (47 kHz) was sonicated while cooling with water.
The supplied electricity was counted by a comutator.
After 4 F mol−1 of electricity was passed through the
cell, the reaction was quenched by EtOH (10 ml). The
mixture was then poured into ice-cold 1 N HCl (100
ml) and the aqueous solution was extracted with ether
(50 ml×3). The combined organic layer was washed
twice with 50 ml of brine, dried over MgSO4, and
concentrated. The resulting crude polymer was dis-
solved in 4 ml of benzene and reprecipitated from
EtOH (100 ml). The molecular weight of the polymer
was determined by GPC with THF as eluent.
1
1483, 1250, 834, 737 cm−1; H-NMR (CDCl3) l 0.60
(s, 1211), 7.30–7.49 (m, 6H), 7.57–7.61 (m, 4H).
HRMS m/e 368.03921 [Calc. for C16H22Cl12Si3,
368.04064].
3.3. Electroreducti6e cross-coupling reaction of
chlorodimethylsilane (1) with dichlorodiphenylgermane
(4) and other dichlorooligosilanes (6, 9)
A solution of chlorosilane (1, 5 mmol) with dichloro-
diphenylgermane (4, 35 mmol) or dichlorooligosilane (6
or 9) in dry THF (15 ml) was electrolyzed by using the
same procedure as for the preparation of trisilane 3 to
afford the corresponding dichlorooligosilanes (supplied
electricity=ca. 6 F mol−1 based on 4). The product
was purified by a silica gel column, eluting with hexane.
Bis(dimethylsilyl)diphenylgermane (5): IR (neat)
Poly[1,2,2-trimethyl-l-phenyldisilane] (12): IR (KBr)
3300, 1652, 1250, 710 cm−1; 1H-NMR (CDCl3) l 0.02–
0.11 (m, 9H), 7.25–7.35 (m, 5H).
3005, 2104, 1422, 1244, 1092, 878 cm−1 1H-NMR
;
(CDCl3) l 0.31 (d, 12H, J=4.3 Hz), 4.26 (sep, 2H,
J=4.3 Hz), 7.28–7.33 (m, 6H), 7.40–7.45 (m, 4H);
HRMS m/e 346.06196 [Calc. for C16H24GeSi2,
346.06283].
Poly[1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-2,2-diphenyltrisilane]
(13):
IR (KBr) 3308, 2981, 1428, 1250, 804, 702 cm−1
;
1H-NMR (CDCl3) l 0.02–0.10 (m, 12H), 7.10–7.45 (m,
5H).
1,1,2,2,4,4,5,5 - Octamethyl - 3,3 - diphenylpentasilane
(8): IR (neat) 3052, 2957, 2896, 2100, 1483, 1250, 838,
Poly[1,1,3,3,4,4 -hexamethyl -2,2-diphenyltetrasilane]
(14): IR (ICBr) 3156, 2958, 1382, 1299, 808 cm−1
;
1
735 cm−1; H-NMR (CDCl3) l 0.01 (d, 12H, J=4.5
1H-NMR (CDCl3) l −0.30 to 0.20 (m, 18H), 7.00–
7.40 (m, 5H).
Hz), 0.31 (s, 12H), 3.78 (sep, 2H, J=4.5 Hz), 7.31–
7.38 (m, 6H), 7.48–7.59 (m, 4H). Anal. Calc. for
C20H36Si5: C, 57.62; H, 830. Found: C, 57.88; H, 839%.
1,1,2,2,3,4,4-Hexamethyl-3-phenyltetrasilane (10): IR
Poly[bis(dimethylsilyl)diphenylgermane] (15): IR
(KBr) 3068, 1431, 1260, 710, 1088 cm−1 1H-NMR
;
(CDCl3) l −0.54 to 0.47 (m, 12H), 6.29–7.52 (m, 5H).
(neat) 3052, 2093, 1598, 1249, 838 cm−1 1H-NMR
;
(CDl3) l 0.02–0.32 (m, 21H), 3.72–3.86 (m, 1H), 3.88–
4.04 (m, 1H), 7.26–7.58 (m, 5H).
Acknowledgements
3.4. Chlorination of bis(dimethylsilyl)diphenylgermane
(5) [10]
The author (S.K.) thanks the Ministry of Education,
Science and Culture Japan for Grant-in Aid for Scien-
tific Research on Priority Areas (No. 11120257).
Bis(dimethylsilyl)diphenylgermane (5) was chlori-
nated using the same procedure as for the chlorination
of trisilane 3 to give bis(chlorodimethylsilyl)diphenyl-
References
1
germane (7). IR (neat) 3005, 2890, 735 cm−1; H-NMR
(CDCl3) l 0.64 (s, 12H), 7.32–7.39 (m, 6H), 7.48–7.56
(m, 4H).
[1] (a) R.D. Miller, C.G. Willson, G.M. Wallraff, N. Clecak, R.
Sooriyakumaran, J. Michl, T. Karatsu, A.L. McKinley, K.A.
Klingensmith, L. Downing, Polym. Eng. Sci. 29 (1989) 882. (b)
R.D. Miller, G.M. Wallraff, N. Clecak, R. Sooriyakumaran, J.
Michl, T. Karatsu, A.J. McKinley, K.A. Klingensmith, J. Down-
ing, Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 60 (1989) 49. (c) R.D. Miller, J.
Michl, Chem. Rev. 89 (1989) 1359. (d) R.D. Miller, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. Adv. Mater. 28 (1989) 1733. (e) R. West,
L.D. David, P.I. Djurovich, K.L. Stearley, K.S.V. Srinivasan, H.
Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103 (1981) 7352. (f) R.G. Kepler, J.M.
3.5. Electroreducti6e polymerization of dichlorodisilane
9 and dichlorotrisilane 6
Into the electrolysis cell (30-ml three-necked flask
equipped with one pair of Mg electrodes and a three-
way stopcock jointed to a balloon of nitrogen), was