J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3139-3140
3139
Chart 1
Enantioselective Synthesis of Unsaturated Cyclic
Tertiary Ethers By Mo-Catalyzed Olefin Metathesis
Dustin R. Cefalo,† Andrew F. Kiely,† Margarita Wuchrer,†
Jennifer Y. Jamieson,‡ Richard R. Schrock,‡ and
Amir H. Hoveyda*,†
Department of Chemistry,
Merkert Chemistry Center
Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467
Department of Chemistry
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
ReceiVed NoVember 10, 2000
One popular approach to the synthesis of optically pure
materials involves catalytic metatheses performed on substrates
that have already been accessed in the nonracemic form.1,2 A more
direct approach to enantioselective synthesis takes advantage of
a unique attribute of catalytic metathesis: structural reorganization
of an achiral substrate leading directly to a chiral nonracemic
product.3 Such an objective can now be realized with the advent
of efficient Mo-based chiral complexes represented by 1-4 (Chart
1).4 The results of our studies regarding the catalytic enantiose-
lective synthesis of unsaturated pyrans through Mo-catalyzed
alkene metathesis are reported herein. Readily available starting
materials are used to obtain optically enriched unsaturated cyclic
tertiary ethers that are difficult to access by alternative methods.
Unlike previous cases, highly strained olefins are not required as
substrates.3
Table 1.
To initiate our studies, we subjected cyclopentene 5 (Table 1)
to 5 mol % chiral Mo catalysts shown in Chart 1 (22 °C, C6H6,
12 h). Appreciable conversion was observed in all cases (Table
1), with catalysts 3a and 3b exhibiting the highest levels of
asymmetric induction. Whereas similar enantioselectivity is
obtained at 0 °C, when 5 is treated with 5 mol % 3a at 50 °C (4
h), 6 is generated in 96% ee and 87% isolated yield (see entry 1,
Table 2). Data in Table 2 indicate that a variety of cyclopentenyl
substrates undergo enantioselective Mo-catalyzed rearrangement
to afford the desired pyrans in >90% ee (>70% yield). Several
issues regarding results in Table 2 merit comment: (1) All
transformations were carried out with 5 mol % 3a. Lower catalyst
loadings may however be employed. Treatment of 5 with 2 mol
% 3a (C6H6, 55 °C) leads to the formation of 6 in 92% ee and
90% yield (>98% conv, 24 h).5 (2) All reactions may be
performed at 50 °C with 3a, except for that shown in entry 3.
Dihydropyran 10 is formed in 62% ee (53% conv, 2 h) at 50 °C;
at 80 °C (toluene), >98% conv is achieved and 10 is generated
in 93% ee and 93% yield. (3) In all the transformations in Table
2, <2% dimeric products are detected (1H NMR analysis).
The higher enantioselectivity at elevated temperatures is not
due to equilibration (ring-opening/ring-closing) of the initially
formed and less enantiopure dihydropyrans. Treatment of a sample
of 6 (53% ee) with 5 mol % optically pure 3a (C6H6, 5 mol %
diallyl ether,3 60 °C) leads to the recovery of 6 in 55% ee.
Moreover, a similar equilibration does not lead to diminution of
selectivity: when an optically enriched sample of 8 (91% ee) is
subjected to 5 mol % racemic catalyst (6 h, 50 °C), the unsaturated
pyran is recovered in 91% ee.
a Determined by 1H NMR. b Determined by chiral GLC (CDGTA);
major isomers in entries 1-2 are enantiomers of those in entries 3-5.
clopentenyl substrate i could lead to the preferential formation
of ii or iW, which would then undergo RCM to deliver the desired
pyran. Pathways (a) and (b) are more complex than previously
reported reactions of cyclobutene- and norbornene-containing
substrates,3,6 where Mo-catalyzed rupture of strained alkenes is
irreversible. Here, intermediates ii and iW can readily re-convert
to i; such a possibility renders the identity of the stereochemistry-
determining step more ambiguous. Initial AROM may be enan-
tioselective but the resulting Mo-alkylidene might revert back
to the starting cyclopentene faster than conversion to the corre-
sponding unsaturated pyran. In turn, it may be the minor product
from the AROM process that rapidly undergoes RCM and thus
the majority of products may be generated by such a route. A
third pathway (c) involves reaction through Mo-alkylidene W,
which would subsequently undergo asymmetric ring-closing/ring-
opening metathesis (ARCM/ROM). As in the case where AROM
(3) For a previous report involving structural reorganization of strained
substrates through AROM/RCM, see: Weatherhead, G. S.; Ford, J. G.;
Alexanian, E. J.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 1828-1829.
(4) Complex 1: (a) Alexander, J. B.; La, D. S.; Cefalo, D. R.; Hoveyda,
A. H.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4041-4042. (b) La, D.
S.; Alexander, J. B.; Cefalo, D. R.; Graf, D. D.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock, R.
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9720-9721. Complex 2: (c) Alexander, J.
B.; Schrock, R. R.; Davis, W. M.; Hultzsch, K. C.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Houser,
J. H. Organometallics 2000, 19, 3700-3715. Complex 3a: (d) Zhu, S. S.;
Cefalo, D. R.; La, D. S.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Davis, W. M.; Hoveyda, A. H.;
Schrock, R. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8251-8259. (e) Weatherhead,
G. S.; Houser, J. H.; Ford, J. G.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda,
A. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9553-9559. Complex 4: (f) Aeilts, S.;
Cefalo, D. R.; Bonitatbeus, Jr.; P. J.; Houser, J. H.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Schrock,
R. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, in press.
Several plausible mechanistic scenarios are illustrated in
Scheme 1. Asymmetric ring-opening metathesis (AROM) of cy-
† Boston College.
‡ Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
(1) Furstner, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3012-3043.
(2) For representative examples, see: (a) Johannes, C. W.; Visser, M. S.;
Weatherhead G. S.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8340-
8347. (b) Furstner, A.; Thiel, O. R. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1738-1742. (d)
Limanto, J.; Snapper, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8071-8072.
(5) With 1 mol % 3a, 6 is formed in 91% ee and 79% isolated yield.
(6) La, D. S.; Ford, J. G.; Sattely, E. S.; Bonitatebus, P. J.; Schrock,
R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11603-11604.
10.1021/ja0039177 CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/13/2001