4164 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 18, 2001
Boger et al.
ing reaction of lactol 12 with iodomethylenetriphenylphos-
phorane33 to provide the corresponding Z-iodoalkene was not
successful. After protection of 13 with Et3SiOTf (95%), the
resulting ester 14 was reduced with Dibal-H to give alcohol 15
(90%), which was subsequently oxidized with Dess-Martin
periodinane34 to provide aldehyde 16 (100%). Attempts to
homologate 16 to the corresponding Z,Z-iododiene enlisting
iodomethylenetriphenylphosphorane33 provided the desired io-
dide35 (78% from 15, Z:E ) 4.2:1) but with modest stereose-
lection. Not only were the two isomers not separable by
chromatography, but the product proved labile to isomerization
during attempts at purification. Consequently, we employed a
two-step procedure enlisting the Corey and Fuchs reaction36 of
aldehyde 16 to first obtain dibromide 17 (94% from 15),
followed by selective reduction of 17 with Bu3SnH-
Pd(PPh3)4,37 to cleanly yield the substantially more stable cis-
vinyl bromide 18.35 In contrast to the Z,Z-iododiene, 18 proved
stable to handling during purification. In initial efforts to
elaborate 18 to the requisite Z,Z,E-triene unit found in the natural
product, the removal of PMB group following Stille coupling
with 22 proved problematic. Consequently, the PMB group was
exchanged for an acetate by treatment of 17 with DDQ (95%)
and acetylation of 19 to provide 20 (93%). Selective reduction
of 20 with Bu3SnH-Pd(PPh3)4 furnished cis-vinyl bromide 21
(84%) with only occasional and trace generation of the over-
reduced product (5-10%). Stille coupling38 of 21 with vinyl-
stannane 2239 was found to be low-yielding under typical
conditions. Enlisting conditions first established with a model
substrate (Scheme 5), the Stille coupling of 21 with 22
conducted in i-Pr2NEt provided the key intermediate, Z,Z,E-
triene 23, in excellent yield (82%) with nearly perfect stereo-
chemical intergrity (g98:2). While 21 and 23 are only margin-
ally stable at room temperature when stored as oils, no
decomposition or isomerization was observed over several
months when they were stored as solutions in nonpolar solvents
at 0-5 °C. Although deacetylation of 23 using standard
Scheme 5
hydrolytic methods (K2CO3/MeOH, LiOH/THF/H2O) led to
acetate removal followed by migration and/or desilylation of
the neighboring triethylsilyl group, reduction with Dibal-H gave
the desired primary alcohol 24 (98%), which was converted to
aldehyde 25 by Dess-Martin oxidation34 (91%).
The remaining conversion of 25 to the ketophosphonate 27
set the stage for a Wadsworth-Horner-Emmons reaction to
unite the C1-C6 and C7-C18 subunits. Initial attempts to add
the anion derived from diethyl methylphosphonate to aldehyde
25 in THF met with limited success. However, when the reaction
was performed in the nonpolar solvent toluene, superb conver-
sions (1:1 mixture of diastereomers) were observed, and the
â-ketophosphonate 27 was obtained after Dess-Martin oxida-
tion of 26 (90% for two steps).40
Synthesis of Dephosphoryl Fostriecin: Correlation and
Confirmation of Structure. Prior to completing the total
synthesis of 1, we first wanted to correlate our synthetic
intermediates with those of the natural product to ensure they
possessed the C8 natural stereochemistry. This was accom-
plished by linking the C1-C6 and C7-C18 subunits, the
diastereocontrolled introduction of the C8 methyl group,
elaboration of the lactone, and correlation with fostriecin
derivatives that lack the phosphate. Initial efforts first condensed
a â-ketophosphonate related to 27 with the sensitive lactone
aldehyde 28,19 which provided 2941 in modest conversions (10-
36%). The best conversions were obtained by using the Roush-
Masamune procedure42 with aldehyde 28 generated in situ by
Swern oxidation of the corresponding alcohol as described19
and appeared to be limited by the sensitivity of the aldehyde to
the basic reaction conditions (eq 1). This, coupled with our
inability to cleanly add a methyl nucleophile to the C8 carbonyl
versus the lactone, led to the use of the lactone precursor 6.
Wadsworth-Horner-Emmons reaction of â-ketophosphonate
(1H, dd, J ) 7.0, 15.0 Hz), 2.22 (1H, ddd, J ) 6.2, 7.3, 12.8 Hz), 1.71
(1H, ddd, J ) 5.9, 11.8 Hz) 0.87 (9H, s), 0.05 (3H, s), 0.04 (3H, s); IR
(neat) νmax 2942, 1734, 1515, 1247, 1093, 837 cm-1; MALDIFTMS (DHB)
m/z 447.2175 (M + Na+ C22H36O6Si requires 447.2173).
(33) Stork, G.; Zhao, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2173-2174.
(34) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277-
7287.
(35) Characterization for iodide (4.2:1 Z,Z-iododiene versus E,Z-iodo-
diene): 1H NMR (Z,Z-iododiene) δ 7.68 (1H, m), 7.19 (2H, m), 6.84 (2H,
m), 6.85 (1H, m), 6.25 (1H, t, J ) 10.9 Hz), 6.08 (1H, d, J ) 7.6 Hz), 5.70
(1H, t, J ) 10.1 Hz), 4.97 (1H, m), 4.32 (2H, s), 4.23 (1H, m), 3.36 (2H,
m), 3.30 (3H, s), 2.00 (1H, m), 1.82 (1H, m), 1.18 (9H, m), 1.10 (9H, s),
1
0.08 (6H, m), 0.21 (3H, s), 0.17 (3H, s); H NMR (E,Z-iododiene) δ 7.64
(1H, m), 7.21 (2H, m), 6.86 (2H, m), 6.00 (1H, d, J ) 14.0 Hz), 5.56 (1H,
d, J ) 11.1 Hz), 5.44 (1H, t, J ) 9.7 Hz), 5.15 (1H, m), 4.37 (2H, s), 4.25
(1H, m), 3.37 (2H, m), 3.31 (3H, s), 2.00 (1H, m), 1.82 (1H, m), 1.18 (9H,
m), 1.10 (9H, s), 1.08 (6H, m), 0.22 (3H, s), 0.18 (3H, s); IR (neat) νmax
2936, 2864, 1241, 1092 cm-1; FABHRMS (NBA-CsI) m/z 765.1248 (M
+ Cs+, C28H49IO4Si2 requires 765.1269). For 18: 1H NMR (C6D6, 400
MHz) δ 7.21-7.23 (2H, m), 6.91 (1H, dd, J ) 7.5, 11.0 Hz), 6.82-6.85
(2H, m), 6.38 (1H, dd, J ) 10.5, 11.0 Hz), 5.88 (1H, d, J ) 7.5 Hz), 5.65
(1H, dd, J ) 9.5, 10.5 Hz), 4.94-4.99 (1H, m), 4.31-4.38 (2H, m), 4.19-
4.23 (1H, m), 3.41 (1H, dd, J ) 6.0, 9.5 Hz), 3.36 (1H, dd, J ) 4.9, 9.5
Hz), 3.33 (3H, s), 1.97 (1H, ddd, J ) 4.4, 8.2, 13.8 Hz), 1.73 (1H, ddd, J
) 4.6, 7.3, 13.8 Hz), 1.10 (9H, t, J ) 7.9 Hz), 1.02 (9H, s), 0.76 (6H, q,
J ) 7.9 Hz), 0.17 (3H, s); FABHRMS (NBA-CsI) m/z 717.1428 (M +
Cs+, C28H49BrO4Si2 requires 717.1407).
(40) Initial studies conducted with the analogous TBS-protected vinnyl-
stannane related to 22 provided the corresponding C18 OTBS derivatives
of 23-27, 30, and 31. Selective deprotection of the C9 OTES group was
not achieved, leading to the adoption of reagent 22. Characterization data
for these intermediates are provided in the Supporting Information.
(41) Characterization for 29: 1H NMR (CD3CN, 500 MHz) δ 7.02-
6.97 (1H, m), 6.92-6.84 (1H, m), 6.80-6.75 (1H, m), 6.60-6.56 (1H, m),
6.19-6.13 (1H, m), 5.97-5.86 (1H, m), 5.82-5.66 (3H, m), 5.59-5.64
(1H, m), 5.23-5.09 (2H, m), 4.70-4.67 (1H, m), 4.13-4.12 (2H, m), 2.28-
2.12 (2H, m), 2.08-1.92 (1H, m), 1.68-1.58 (1H, m), 1.13-0.90 (27H,
m), 0.80-0.72 (6H, m), 0.24-0.18 (6H, m), 0.09-0.08 (6H, m); FAB-
HRMS (NBA-CsI) m/z 825.3367 (M + Cs+, C37H68O6Si3 requires
825.3378).
(36) Corey, E. J.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 3769-3772.
(37) Uenishi, J.; Kawahama, R.; Yonemitsu, O.; Tsuji, J. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 8965-8975. Uenishi, J.; Kawahama, R.; Shiga, Y.; Yonemitsu,
O.; Tsuji, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6759-6762. Uenishi, J.; Kawahama,
R.; Yonemitsu, O.; Tsuji, J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5716-5717.
(38) Evans, D. A.; Black, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4497-
4513. Gibbs, R. A.; Krishnan, U. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2509-2512.
(39) Jung, M. E.; Light, L. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3851-3854.
Bansal, R.; Cooper, G. F.; Corey, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 1329-
1332.