172
H. Peng et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10 (2002) 167–174
washout experiments. It is observed that compounds
6 and 13 showed inhibitory selectivity for ATM over
Synthesis of compound 13
mTOR, with
higher selectivity ratio as compared to wortmannin
(Table 1).
a
reversed selective preference and
To a suspension of 12 (26 mg, 0.096 mmol) and triethy-
lamine (500 mL) in CHCl3 (3 mL) was added a 1:1 mix-
ture (100 mL) of methacrylic acid and oxalic chloride at
0 ꢁC. After stirring for 1 h, the mixture was washed with
water and CHCl3. The combined organic layer was
dried, concentrated and purified by silica gel column
chromatography using methanol/ethyl acetate/chloro-
form (1:1:10) as mobile phase to give 13 as colorless
solid (13 mg, 57%), mp 202–205 ꢁC. FT-IR (KBr) 3271,
The significantly lower activity of lactones 5 and 6
toward mTOR suggest that in addition to a presence of
a Michael acceptor, inhibition of mTOR may require
more extended enzyme–inhibitor interaction than that
of ATM. The best of the mTOR inhibitors discovered is
pyrrolo-quinoline derived 2-(4-chloro-phenyl)-2-ene-
butyricacid ester HP9912 (Fig. 1, 0.5 mM). It showed
selectivity for mTOR over ATM, with the same selective
preference as that of wortmannin, but higher selectivity
ratio (Table 1). In the NCI 60 human tumor cell line
screen, DK8G557 (13) showed potent and selective
growth inhibition activities.
1
2928, 1777, 1646, 1449, 1412, 1266, 1121, 778 cmꢀ1; H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.07 (m, 2H), 7.83 (d,
J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (t,
J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.42 (d, J=3 Hz, 1H, H-30), 5.72 (d,
J=2.1 Hz, 0.7H, H-30), 5.71 (d, J=2.7 Hz, 0.3H, H-30),
5.11 (m, 4H, H-2, H-5), 4.72 (t, J=8.4 Hz, 1H, H-60),
4.59 (t, J=9.3 Hz, 1H, H-60), 4.30 (m, 1H, H-50); HRMS
(m/z) calcd for C17H14N2O3 294.1004, found 294.0994.
ꢂ
Anal. calcd for C17H14N2O3 0.25H2O: C, 68.33; H,
4.89; N, 9.37. Found: C, 68.30; H, 4.89; N, 9.20.
Experimental
Thin layer chromatography analysis (TLC) was per-
formed on aluminum sheets precoated with 0.2 mm of
silica gel containing 60F254 indicator. Spots were
detected with shortwave UV light or Ceric sulfate spray.
Flash chromatography was run using 230–400 mesh
silica gel. The homogeneity of all the compounds was
routinely checked by TLC on silica gel plates, and also
by HPLC. Melting points were measured on a Kofler
hot stage apparatus attached to a digital thermometer
and were uncorrected. Fourier transformed infrared
spectra were obtained on a Nicolet 520 FT-IR spectro-
meter. 1H (300 or 400 MHz), 13C (75 or 100 MHz)
NMR and DEPT spectra were recorded on either a
Varian Gemini-300 or on a Varian XL-400 spectro-
meter. Chemical shifts are reported relative to CDCl3 (d
7.24). High-resolution mass spectra (EI or FAB) were
recorded on a VG Analytical 70-SE mass spectrometer
equipped with a 11-250J data system. Elemental ana-
lyses were performed by Atlantic Microlab, Norcross,
GA, USA.
Synthesis of compound 14
A mixture of 13 (50 mg, 0.170 mmol) and DMAP
(23 mg, 0.187 mmol) in chloroform (3 mL) was stirred
for 1 day at room temperature. The mixture was directly
concentrated and purified by silica gel chromatography
using methanol/ethyl acetate/chloroform (1:1:15) as the
mobile phase to give 14 (32 mg, 64%) as colorless solid:
mp 235 ꢁC. FT-IR (KBr) 3044, 2929, 2873, 1857, 1778,
1749, 1651, 1600, 1505, 1435, 1410, 1378, 1295, 1095,
1031, 927, 778, 759 cmꢀ1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d
8.05 (m, 2H), 7.84 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (m, 1H), 7.57
(t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H), 5.11–5.00 (m, 4H, H-2, H-5), 4.94,
4.90 (s, 2H, H-60), 2.04 (t, J=2.1 Hz, 3H, H-30); EIMS m/
z (relative intensity) 294.0 (M+, 13), 169.1 (20), 97.1 (10),
83.1 (12), 69.1 (21), 57.1 (21), 44.0 (100); HRMS (m/z)
calcd for C17H14N2O3 294.1004, found 294.0994. Anal.
ꢂ
calcd for C17H14N2O3 0.25H2O: C, 68.33; H, 4.89; N,
9.37. Found: C, 68.41; H, 4.81; N, 9.24.
Synthesis of compound 15. To a solution of 13 (37 mg,
0.127 mmol) in chloroform (3 mL) was added 2 equiv of
m-CPBA(73 mg) in three portions. The reaction was
allowed to react at rt for 2 h, then the mixture was
quenched with satd NaHCO3 aqueous solution and
extracted with CHCl3. The combined organic layer was
dried over MgSO4, concentrated and purified by silica
gel chromatography using methanol/ethyl acetate/
chloroform (1:1:10) as mobile phase to give compound
15 (30 mg, 71%) as colorless solid, mp 190–192 ꢁC. IR
(KBr) 3087, 2987, 2922, 2864, 2246, 1765, 1666, 1650,
Syntheses of precursors 2–11 have been previously
documented.16,17,20
Synthesis of alcohol 12
To a solution of 1,3-dihydro-2H-pyrrolo[3, 4-b]quino-
line 11 (4.0 g, 23.5 mmol) in absolute ethanol (200 mL)
was added bis-g-lactone 7 (3.45 g, 24.3 mmol). The mix-
ture was refluxed in a nitrogen atmosphere for 2 h.
Concentration of the solution followed by titration with
chloroform precipitated alcohol 12 as white solid (4.7 g,
64%), mp 201–202 ꢁC. FT-IR (KBr) 3300, 3200, 1760,
1625 cmꢀ1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3COCD3) d 8.09 (s,
1H), 7.82 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (t, J=8.4 Hz, 1H),
7.57 (t, J=8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.07 (m, 4H, H-2, H-5), 4.72 (t,
J=8.7 Hz, 1H, H-60), 4.52 (t, J=8.4 Hz, 1H, H-60),
3.97(brs, 2H, H-30), 3.85(m, 1H, H-50), 3.05(m, 2H, H-20
and –OH); HRMS m/z calcd for C17H16N2O4 312.1110,
found 312.1091. Anal. calcd for C17H16N2O4: C, 45.38;
H, 5.13. Found: C, 45.22; H, 5.22.
1580, 1457, 1427, 1401, 1118, 737 cmꢀ1 1H NMR
;
(300 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.70 (d, J=9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d,
J=8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (t, J=1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (m, 2H),
6.43 (d, J=2.7 Hz, 1H), 5.74 (d, J=2.7 Hz, 0.7H), 5.70
(d, J=2.7 Hz, 0.3H), 5.33–5.06 (m, 4H), 4.73–4.68 (m,
1H), 4.59 (t, J=8.9 Hz, 1H), 4.32 (m, 1H); EIMS m/z
(relative intensity) 310.1 (M+, 28.7), 294.2 (36.4), 235.2
(9.6), 197.1 (10.8), 185.1 (10.1), 169.1 (100), 140.1 (15.1),
125.1 (32.4), 115.1 (12.5), 67.0 (15.1); HRMS (m/z)
calcd for C17H14N2O4 310.0954, found 310.0948. Anal.