Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
N.; Mieczkowski, A.; Matsumoto, A.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5568.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
■
S
(10) Amidine HAT affords C−O or C−N: (a) Wang, Y.-F.; Chen,
H.; Zhu, X.; Chiba, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11980. (b) Chen,
H.; Sanjaya, S.; Wang, Y.-F.; Chiba, S. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 212.
(11) Metal-mediated C−H functionalization of alcohol derivatives:
(a) Huang, C.; Chattopadhyay, B.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 12406. (b) Simmons, E. M.; Hartwig, J. F. Nature 2012,
483, 70. (c) Ren, Z.; Mo, F.; Dong, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
16991. For other (non-alcohol) directed C−H aminations, see SI..
(12) (a) Moriyama, K.; Kuramochi, M.; Fujii, K.; Morita, T.; Togo,
H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14546. (b) Kim, S.; Joe, G. H.; Do,
J. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3328.
Experimental procedures, spectroscopic data for all new
1
compounds, including H and 13C NMR spectra (PDF)
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
ORCID
■
(13) Zard, S. Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1603.
(14) (a) Forrester, A. R.; Gill, M.; Thomson, R. H. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 621. (b) Shu, W.; Nevado, C. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2017, 56, 1881. (c) See also ref 10.
(15) (a) Glover, S. A.; Beckwith, A. L. J. Aust. J. Chem. 1987, 40, 701.
(b) Glover, S. A.; Hammond, G. P.; Harman, D. G.; Mills, J. G.;
Rowbottom, C. A. Aust. J. Chem. 1993, 46, 1213.
Author Contributions
†These authors contributed equally.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(16) DFT calculations indicate N-H BDE’s are nearly identical for all
imidates in Figure 1b (100
1 kcal/mol), suggesting that HAT is
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
more likely related to the SOMO energies. Ground state calculations
on the SOMO energies of imidate radicals, as well as N−H BDE
calculations, performed using the ωB97X-D/6-31G(D) hybrid func-
tional.
We thank The Ohio State University, National Institutes of
Health (NIH R35 GM119812), and American Chemical
Society Petroleum Research Fund for financial support.
̌
́
(17) Sakic, D.; Zipse, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 3983.
(18) Ishibashi, H.; Sato, T.; Ikeda, M. Synthesis 2002, 2002, 695.
(19) Overman, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 597. Interestingly,
conversion of imidates to oxazolines was the expected product that
serendipitously led to discovery of the Overman rearrangement:
Overman, L. E. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 6432.
(20) For comparison, metal-mediated β C-H aminations (ref 3)
require carbamate N-deprotection via two subsequent steps.
(21) Blanksby, S. J.; Ellison, G. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 255.
(22) Simmons, E. M.; Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
3066.
(23) (a) Gant, T. G.; Meyers, A. I. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2297.
(b) Wong, G. S. K.; Wu, W. Oxazolines. In Oxazoles: Synthesis,
Reactions, and Spectroscopy; Palmer, D. C., Ed.; Wiley & Sons:
Hoboken, 2004; pp 331−528.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Synthetic strategies for β-amino alcohols and their applications:
(a) Ager, D. J.; Prakash, I.; Schaad, D. R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 835.
(b) Bergmeier, S. C. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2561. (c) Karjalainen, O.
K.; Koskinen, A. M. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 4311.
(2) C−H amination reviews: (a) Davies, H. M. L.; Manning, J. R.
Nature 2008, 451, 417. (b) Roizen, J. L.; Harvey, M. E.; Du Bois, J.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 911. (c) Jeffrey, J. L.; Sarpong, R. Chem. Sci.
2013, 4, 4092.
(3) β-amination of carbamates: (a) Espino, C. G.; Du Bois, J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 598. (b) Cui, Y.; He, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 4210. (c) Lebel, H.; Huard, K.; Lectard, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 14198. Pd-catalyzed amination of carbamate, allylic C−H
bonds: (d) Fraunhoffer, K. J.; White, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 7274.
(4) For metal-mediated γ-amination of alcohol derivatives, see SI.
(5) Wappes, E. A.; Fosu, S. C.; Chopko, T. C.; Nagib, D. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9974.
(6) Intramolecular HAT: (a) Wolff, M. E. Chem. Rev. 1963, 63, 55.
(b) Barton, D. H. R.; Hesse, R. H.; Pechet, M. M.; Smith, L. C. J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1979, 1159. (c) Breslow, R. Acc. Chem. Res.
1980, 13, 170. (d) Francisco, C. G.; Herrera, A. J.; Suar
́
ez, E. J. Org.
̌
̌
Chem. 2003, 68, 1012. (e) Cekovic,
́
Z. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8073.
(f) Chiba, S.; Chen, H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 4051.
(7) Seminal examples of alcohol-tethered, radical precursors (e.g.,
chaperones) without HAT: (a) Ueno, Y.; Chino, K.; Watanabe, M.;
Moriya, O.; Okawara, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5564. (b) Stork,
G.; Mook, R.; Biller, S. A.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983,
105, 3741. (c) Nishiyama, H.; Kitajima, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Itoh, K. J.
Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2298.
(8) Remote C−H functionalization via intramolecular HAT of
alcohol-tethered radicals: (a) Breslow, R.; Winnik, M. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1969, 91, 3083. (b) Breslow, R.; Baldwin, S. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1970, 92, 732. (c) Curran, D. P.; Kim, D.; Liu, H. T.; Shen, W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5900. (d) Chen, K.; Richter, J. M.; Baran, P. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7247. (e) Voica, A.-F.; Mendoza, A.;
Gutekunst, W. R.; Fraga, J. O.; Baran, P. S. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 629.
(f) Parasram, M.; Chuentragool, P.; Sarkar, D.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6340.
(9) In contrast, intramolecular HAT of amine-tethered radicals afford
remote C−C formation: (a) Snieckus, V.; Cuevas, J. C.; Sloan, C. P.;
Liu, H.; Curran, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 896. (b) Yoshikai,
D
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX