Y. Guindon, M. Bencheqroun / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 6041–6044
6043
center of the a-methylbenzyl group is planar to the
carbonyl of the amide. This conformation forces the
two substituents (methyl and benzyl) to be quasi
orthogonal to the heterocycle making even more
difficult the bottom face trajectory of the Bu3SnH (Fig.
2).
the same as the minor reduced lactam 4 (entry 1),
corroborated that the reduction of N-(Boc) bromo
lactam 2f had in fact led to the formation of the syn
product.
In conclusion, the present study indicates that a nitro-
gen can replace an oxygen as the heteroatom in the
hydrogen-transfer paradigm studied herein to give
access to the anti product. Alternatively, the sense of
diastereoselectivity can be reversed by adding sub-
stituents on the nitrogen, while the use of a-methylben-
zyl and Boc groups in such reactions can provide
optimal results favoring syn isomers.
The reduction of N-(Acyl) bromo lactams was also
considered in this study. As seen in entry 6, the N-(Ac)
substrate gave a 5:1 ratio in favor of the syn product,
while an excellent ratio >20:1 was obtained for the
N-(Boc) derivative. Our rationale for the latter result is
that the two carbonyls take on a synperiplanar or
synclinal10 conformation that positions the tert-butyl
group in the trajectory of the bottom face Bu3SnH
attack (Fig. 2). The conformational arguments consid-
ered herein have been shown to be applicable to early
transition states, which are normally invoked when
free-radical intermediates are involved.11 Of additional
interest is that the mild basic treatment of the N-(Boc)
reduced lactam 16 [MeONa, MeOH, 0°C, 10 min, 80%]
led exclusively to an acyclic b-N-(Boc)-amino ester,12
which belongs to a family of compounds with a large
range of biological activity.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported financially by NSERC. We
thank Dr. Brigitte Gue´rin and Ms. LaVonne Dlouhy
for their assistance in the preparation of this
manuscript.
References
Literature suggests that the relative configuration of the
reduced products can be established by the correlation
of NMR chemical shifts.13 In this study, the resonance
of the methyl group adjacent to the ester function for
the syn compounds was slightly downfield relative to
that of the anti isomers as already seen in previously
published results.2 The NMR assignments were verified
by X-ray crystallographic structure of the reduced N-
benzylated syn product 10 (Fig. 3) and were further
verified through a series of chemical transformations.
Benzylation of the major reduced product 3 (entry 1)
gave a compound identical to the minor N-(benzylated)
product 9 (entry 4), confirming the anti relative
diastereoselectivity obtained for the reduction of lactam
2a. Similarly, Boc cleavage of the major reduced
product 16 (entry 7), having given a product that was
1. (a) Porter, N. A.; Giese, B.; Curran, D. P. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1991, 24, 296; (b) Liotta, D. C.; Durkin, K. A.;
Soria, J. J. Chemtracts 1992, 5, 197; (c) Miracle, G. S.;
Cannizzaro, S. M.; Porter, N. A. Chemtracts 1993, 6, 147;
(d) Smadja, W. Synlett 1994, 1; (e) Giese, B.; Damm, W.;
Batra, R. Chemtracts 1994, 7, 355; (f) Curran, D. P.;
Porter, N. A.; Giese, B. Stereochemistry of Radical Reac-
tions–Concepts, Guidelines and Synthetic Applications;
VCH: New York, 1996; (g) Renaud, P.; Gerster, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 2562; (h) Radicals
in Organic Synthesis, 1st ed.; Renaud, P.; Sibi, M. P.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH, 2001; Vol. 1.
2. (a) Guindon, Y.; Yoakim, C.; Lemieux, R.; Boisvert, L.;
Delorme, D.; Lavalle´e, J.-F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31,
2845; (b) Guindon, Y.; Yoakim, C.; Gorys, V.; Ogilvie,
W. W.; Delorme, D.; Renaud, J.; Robinson, G.; Lavalle´e,
J.-F.; Slassi, A.; Jung, G.; Rancourt, J.; Durkin, K.;
Liotta, D. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 1166; (c) Guindon, Y.;
CO2Me
Me
CO2Me
Me
CO2Me O
Me
N
´
Faucher, A.-M.; Bourque, E.; Caron, V.; Jung, G.;
O
O
N
N
Landry, S. R. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 9276 and refer-
ences cited therein.
Ph
Me
Ph
Me
O
O
H
H
Me
Me
Me
N(Boc) radical
3. Guindon, Y.; Slassi, A.; Rancourt, J.; Bantle, G.;
´
N(α-methylbenzyl) radical
Bencheqroun, M.; Murtagh, L.; Ghiro, E.; Jung, G. J.
Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 288.
4. (a) Curran, D. P.; Abraham, A. C.; Liu, H.-T. J. Org.
Chem. 1991, 56, 4335; (b) Ku¨ndig, E. P.; Xu, L.-H.;
Romanens, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4047; (c)
Hanessian, S.; Yang, H.; Schaum, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 2507.
Figure 2.
5. Hubert, J. C.; Steege, W.; Speckamp, W. N.; Huisman,
H. O. Synth. Comm. 1971, 1, 103.
6. Compound 2a: (Less polar) mp 81°C; 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) l 6.68 (broad s, 1H), 3.82 (dd, J=8.0, 4.4
Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 2.43–2.30 (m, 3H), 2.19–2.12 (m,
1H), 1.85 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): l
178.26, 170.81, 61.83, 60.10, 53.45, 29.58, 23.08, 22.03.
Anal. calcd for C8H12BrNO3: C, 38.42; H, 4.84; N, 5.60.
Figure 3. X-Ray crystallographic structure of 10.