prototype of a powerful strategy to overcome one of the
inherent problems in synthesizing oligosaccharides by polymer-
supported methods, namely absolute stereochemical control
of cis-glycoside formation. This new iterative protocol
extends our previous approaches to this problem based on
chemoenzymatic synthesis of oligosaccharide donors10 and
complements a recent entirely chemical approach, which
relies on developing a 100% stereoselective glycosylation
reaction.11
This chemoenzymatic protocol relies on finding enzymes
that are compatible with MPEG-bound acceptors. We have
examined a number of glycosyltransferases, which include
so-called retaining and inverting glycosyltransferases, for this
activity (see Table 1). Experiments with the inverting
enzymes, R(2f3)sialyltransferases and â(1f3)-N-acetyl-
glucosaminyltransferase (LgtA) from Neisseria meningitidis
or Campylobacter jejuni gave extremely low yields or no
reaction.12 Typically, the reactions were treated with more
enzyme and excesses of nucleotide sugar donors. However,
the glycosylation reaction yields were not increased. LgtC
is a retaining enzyme, so we tested 4 as a substrate for
another retaining enzyme, the bovine R(1f3)galactosyl
transferase.13 As expected, near-quantitative galactosylation
of the MPEG-bound acceptor 4 was achieved in the presence
Table 1. Glycosylation Reaction of
GalpR(1f4)Glcpâ-O-(DOX)(PEGM) 4 with a Number of
Retaining and Inverting Glycosyltransferases
yield (%)
(config (R/â))
enzyme (gene)
donor (R/â)
R(2f3) sialyltransferase
(NST-27)a
(CST-04)b
CMP-NeuNAc (â) ∼0
inversion (R)
∼0-2
inversion (R)
∼0-5
(CST-06)b
inversion (R)
â(1f3)-N-acetylglucosaminyl UPD-GlcNAc (R) ∼0-5
transferase (LgtA)c
R(1f3)galactosyltransferase
(bovine)
inversion (â)
>95
retention (R)
>95
retention (R)
UDP-Gal (R)
R(1f4)galactosyltransferase
(LgtC)
a For reaction conditions, see ref 20. b Acceptor 4 (1 mM), HEPES (50
mM), MgCl2 (20 mM), CMP-Neu5Ac (2 mM), 0.08 U of enzyme, 37 °C,
18 h. c For reaction conditions, see ref 20.
of only a small excess of uridine 5′-diphospho galactose
(UDP-Gal, 1.5 equiv). The 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy
(gCOSY, gHSQC, and HMBC) of 14 indicated that the
glycosidic linkage is a cis-GalpR(1f3)Galp linkage (chemi-
cal shift of terminal Gal anomeric proton: δ ) 5.23 ppm, J
) 2.0 Hz). This allows for the synthesis of the so-called
xenotransplantation antigen GalpR(1f3)Galp14 (see Scheme
3).
(8) The stereo- and regiochemistry of R(1f4) linkage 6 was confirmed
by 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy (gCOSY, gHSQC, and HMBC). Selected
1H and 13C NMR data for compound 6: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ
3.58-3.64 (m, 1H, H-5B), 3.75 (t, 1H J ) 7.0 Hz, H-5C), 3.82 (t, 1H, J )
9.0 Hz, H-4B), 4.00 (d, 1H, J ) 2.0 Hz, H-4C), 4.08-4.18 (m, 4H, H-6B,
H-6C, 2 × H-6D), 4.46-4.51 (m, 2H, H-5D, H-6B), 4.51 (d, 1H, J ) 8.0
Hz, H-1C), 4.52 (d, 1H J ) 8.0 Hz, H-1B), 4.60 (d, 1H, J ) 12.5 Hz,
CHDOX), 4.73 (dd, 1H, J ) 3.0, 10.5 Hz, H-3C), 4.86 (d, 1H, J ) 12.0
Hz, CHDOX), 4.96 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.5, 10.0 Hz, H-2B), 4.98 (d, 1H, J ) 3.5
Hz, H-1D), 5.07 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.0, 9.2 Hz, H-2C), 5.09 (s, 2H, DOXCH2),
5.16 (t, 1H, J ) 9.0 Hz, H-3B), 5.17 (dd, 1H, J ) 3.5, 11.0 Hz, H-2D), 5.38
(dd, 1H, J ) 3.5, 11.0 Hz, H-3D), 5.58 (d, 1H, J ) 2.5 Hz, H-4D); 13C
NMR (50.32 MHz, CDCl3,) δ 60.24 (C-6D), 61.26 (C-6C), 62.12 (C-6B),
65.90 (CH2), 67.04 (C-5D), 67.10 (C-3D), 67.86 (C-4D), 68.80 (C-2D), 68.95
(C-2C), 70.26 (CH2), 71.71 (C-5C), 71.78 (C-2B), 72.57 (C-5B), 72.76 (C-
3C), 73.08 (C-3B), 76.37 (C-4B), 76.88 (C-4C), 99.00 (C-1B), 99.59 (C-1D),
101.03 (C-1C).
Scheme 3
(9) The â(1f6) regio- and stereochemistry of 11 was confirmed by
measuring 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy (gCOSY, gHSQC, and HMBC).
Selected 1H NMR and MS data for compound 11: 1H and 13C NMR (500
MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.62-3.66 (m, 1H, H-5B), 3.73-3.83 (m, 3H, H-5C, H-6A,
H-4B), 3.89 (dd, 1H, J ) 4.0, 10.5 Hz, H-6A), 3.96-4.05 (m, 2H, H-5A,
H-4C), 4.09-4.19 (m, 4H, H-6B, 2 × H-6D, H-6C), 4.41-4.46 (m, 1H, H-6C),
4.46-4.54 (m, 2H, H-6B, H-5D), 4.52 (d, 1H, J ) 7.5 Hz, H-1C), 4.59 (d,
1H, J ) 8.0 Hz, H-1B), 4.69 (d, 1H, J ) 8.5 Hz, H-1A), 4.69 (d, 1H, J )
11.5 Hz, CHDOX), 4.73 (dd, 1H, J ) 2.0, 10.5 Hz, H-3C), 4.92 (dd, 1H,
J ) 8.5, 10.0 Hz, H-2B), 4.93 (d, 1H, J ) 12.0 Hz, CHDOX), 4.98 (1H, J
) 3.0 Hz, H-1D), 5.04 (s, 2H, DOXCH2), 5.11 (dd, 1H, J ) 7.5, 10.5 Hz,
H-2C), 5.18 (dd, 1H, J ) 3.5, 11.0 Hz, H-2D), 5.20 (t, 1H, J ) 9.5 Hz,
H-3B), 5.33 (dd, 1H, J ) 3.0, 10.5 Hz, H-3A), 5.39 (dd, 1H, J ) 3.0, 10.5
Hz, H-3D), 5.59 (2H, H-4A, H-4D), 5.72 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.0, 10.0 Hz, H-2A);
13C NMR (50.32 MHz, CDCl3) δ 60.29(C-6D), 61.37 (C-6C), 62.09 (C-6B),
65.96 (CH2), 67.09 (C-3D), 67.17 (C-5D), 67.90 (C-6A), 67.89 (C-4D), 68.98
(C-4A), 69.52 (C-2D), 69.62 (C-2C), 69.95 (C-2A), 70.00 (CH2), 71.66 (C-
2B), 71.79 (C-3A), 71.88 (C-5C), 72.73 (C-5B), 72.74 (C-5A), 72.85 (C-3C),
73.05 (C-3B), 76.32 (C-4B), 77.23 (C-4C), 99.48 (C-1A), 99.67 (C-1D), 100.27
(C-1B), 101.03 (C-1C); MS (MALDI) calcd for C70H82O36Na 1521.45, found
m/z 1521.12 (M + Na+).
(10) Mehta, S.; Gilbert, M.; Wakarchuk, W. W.; Whitfield, D. M. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 751.
(11) Zhu, T.; Boons, G.-J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10222.
(12) (a) Wakarchuk, W. W.; Martin, A.; Jennings, M. P.; Moxon, E. R.;
Richards, J. C. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 19166, (b) R(2f3)Sialyltrans-
ferases from C. jejuni: Gilbert, M.; Brisson, J.-R.; Karwaski, M.-F.;
Michniewicz, J.; Cunningham, A.-M.; Wu, Y.; Young, N. M.; Wakarchuk,
W. W. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 3896.
A recent report successfully used glycosidases with our
(MPEG)(DOX) system, but the maximum reported yields
were 24%, which would compromise our new iterative
(13) Blanken, W. M.; Van den Eijnden, D. H. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260,
12927.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 21, 2001
3267