K. Brachwitz, A. Hilgeroth / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 411–413
413
however, fulfils this requirement. Cytostatic activities of
the comparable tricyclic a-carboline systems in the mil-
limolar range11 are much lower than those found for the
4-phenyl-1-aza-9-oxafluorenes 10 and 11. So we ques-
tioned whether the 4-phenyl ring contributes to planar-
ity of the whole molecule. A coplanar 4-phenyl
substituent may result in an enhanced intercalation
potential of a quasi-tetracyclic aromatic system, thus
giving an explanation for the increased activity of our
compounds 10 and 11 compared to the reported tri-
cyclic a-carboline derivatives. We analyzed the 1H
NMR spectra of all target compounds 10–13 and of the
isolated tetrahydro-intermediates focusing on the che-
mical shifts of the 5-H, 7-H and 8-H: we found high-
field-shifts of the 5-H in 10 to 6.46 ppm and in 11 to
6.28 ppm compared to the resonances of 5-H in both 4-
phenyl tetrahydro-precursors 9 at 6.73and 6.66 ppm.
The resonances of 7-H and 8-H were found at higher
ppm values in 10 with 6.96 and 7.47 ppm and in 11 with
6.97 and 7.48 ppm due to the enhanced aromatic sys-
tems after complete molecule oxidation. The 5-H signals
of both 4-methyl derivatives 12 and 13 at 7.53and 7.56
ppm were found with comparably high ppm-values, like
7-H and 8-H between 7.03and 7.53ppm.
Finally, we presented a novel class of cytostatic agents.
Among the classes of tricyclic compounds they are more
potent than intercalative carboline systems. The 4-
phenyl derivatives show cytostatic activity like tetra-
cyclic ellipticine compounds. So 1-aza-9-oxafluorenes
are promising lead structures in the group of small-sized
cytostatics with potentially better bioavailability. In
present studies, we investigate the mode of cytostatic
action which may be novel within the group of tricyclic
cytostatics.
References and Notes
1. Bailly, C. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 3 9.
2. Sengupta, D.; Anand, N. Ind. J. Chem. 1986, 25B, 72.
3. Insaf, S. S.; Danks, M. K.; Witiak, D. T. Curr. Med. Chem.
1996, 3, 437.
4. Xiao, S.; Lin, W.; Wang, C.; Yang, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2001, 11, 437.
5. Wieczorek, J.; Peczyska-Czoch, W.; Mordarski, M.; Kacz-
marek, L.; Nantka-Namirski, P. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp.
1986, 34, 315.
6. Peczyska-Czoch, W. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 1987, 35,
125.
7. Hilgeroth, A.; Baumeister, U. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112,
588. Hilgeroth, A.; Baumeister, U. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 2000, 39, 576.
8. Kaczmarek, L.; Balicki, R.; Nantka-Namirski, P. Arch.
Pharm. (Weinheim) 1988, 321, 463.
9. Boyd, M. R. Principles Practice Oncol. 1989, 3, 1.
10. Monks, A.; Scudiero, D.; Skehan, P.; Boyd, M. Proc. Am.
Assoc. Cancer Res. 1989, 30, 607.
11. Peczyska-Czoch, W. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 1987, 35,
129.
The significant highfield-shift of 5-H in 10 and 11 of more
than 1 ppm compared to the resonances of 5-H in the 4-
methyl derivatives is caused by a shielding effect of the
neighboring phenyl substituent that will consequently not
lie within the plane of the aromatic system. Otherwise the
resonances of both 5-protons would have been found at
higher ppm values. These experimental results suggest
that the novel cytostatics may not act as intercalators.